Clinical Investigation
Prognostic Value and Reproducibility of Pretreatment CT Texture Features in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.020Get rights and content

Purpose

To determine whether pretreatment CT texture features can improve patient risk stratification beyond conventional prognostic factors (CPFs) in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed 91 cases with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy. All patients underwent pretreatment diagnostic contrast enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) followed by 4-dimensional CT (4D-CT) for treatment simulation. We used the average-CT and expiratory (T50-CT) images from the 4D-CT along with the CE-CT for texture extraction. Histogram, gradient, co-occurrence, gray tone difference, and filtration-based techniques were used for texture feature extraction. Penalized Cox regression implementing cross-validation was used for covariate selection and modeling. Models incorporating texture features from the 33 image types and CPFs were compared to those with models incorporating CPFs alone for overall survival (OS), local-regional control (LRC), and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Predictive Kaplan-Meier curves were generated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Patients were stratified based on whether their predicted outcome was above or below the median. Reproducibility of texture features was evaluated using test-retest scans from independent patients and quantified using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). We compared models incorporating the reproducibility seen on test-retest scans to our original models and determined the classification reproducibility.

Results

Models incorporating both texture features and CPFs demonstrated a significant improvement in risk stratification compared to models using CPFs alone for OS (P=.046), LRC (P=.01), and FFDM (P=.005). The average CCCs were 0.89, 0.91, and 0.67 for texture features extracted from the average-CT, T50-CT, and CE-CT, respectively. Incorporating reproducibility within our models yielded 80.4% (±3.7% SD), 78.3% (±4.0% SD), and 78.8% (±3.9% SD) classification reproducibility in terms of OS, LRC, and FFDM, respectively.

Conclusions

Pretreatment tumor texture may provide prognostic information beyond that obtained from CPFs. Models incorporating feature reproducibility achieved classification rates of ∼80%. External validation would be required to establish texture as a prognostic factor.

Introduction

Lung cancer is currently the most common cause of death from cancer in the United States (1). Frequently, patients present with stage III disease and are not candidates for surgical resection. For these patients, standard of care consists of definitive chemoradiation therapy. Even when patients are treated aggressively, patient 3-year survival rate is approximately 27% (2). Inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are a very heterogeneous population with varying degrees of tumor extent, comorbidity, and other characteristics. This presents a significant challenge to clinicians attempting to provide optimal treatment. Traditional TNM staging is not ideal for stratifying patients, and there is a tremendous need to develop better tools for assessing prognosis.

Efforts have been made to address this issue by identifying prognostic genetic expression signatures and using functional imaging techniques such as fluorodeoxyglucose-labeled positron emission tomography (PET) 3, 4, 5. Recently, tumor heterogeneity as assessed by computed tomography (CT) has yielded promising preliminary results in a variety of cancers 6, 7, 8. These techniques assess the spatial variation of tumor density within a patient's tumor. Because CT scans are routinely obtained for all patients undergoing radiation therapy, prognostic markers generated in this manner would be less costly and less time consuming than genetic or functional imaging-based techniques.

In this study we examined the impact of CT texture features to enhance patient risk stratification, beyond conventional prognostic factors (CPFs) for patients with stage III NSCLC.

Section snippets

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive radiation therapy between July 2004 and January 2012. These dates were chosen in order to include patients receiving 4-dimensional (4D)CT, which our institution implemented in early 2004, and provide adequate follow-up time. We excluded all patients receiving induction chemotherapy and proton-based radiation therapy and those with <5 years' posttreatment for solid tumor, multiple primary

Model development and analysis

Using L1 penalized Cox proportional hazards regression, models for OS, LRC, and FFDM were generated. Covariates with non-zero coefficients are shown in Table 3. To illustrate patient stratification using these models, cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves for OS, LRC, and FFDM were developed along with their associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Models with and without texture features are shown in Figure 1. Models using both texture features and CPFs demonstrated a statistically significant

Discussion

We showed that models incorporating both texture features and CPFs demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in stratification compared to models using CPFs alone in cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves in terms of OS (P=.046), LRC (P=.01), and FFDM (P=.005). Furthermore, we showed that even when incorporating the reproducibility of our metrics within our models, classification rates of approximately 80% are still achieved.

We used cross-validation for both model selection and model

Conclusions

Patient outcome modeling has significant implications in many fields of medicine and particularly in oncology. Our study found that the combination of CT texture and CPFs can be used to generate superior outcome models when compared to CPFs alone in terms of OS, LRC, and FFDM. This additional information could be of use to physicians, patients, and caregivers. Further work needs to be done in order to generate widely applicable, accurate risk prediction tools capable of being implemented

References (25)

  • D.M. Hari et al.

    AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition criteria for colon cancer: Do the complex modifications improve prognostic assessment?

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2013)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2013

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2013)
  • N. Hanna et al.

    Phase III study of cisplatin, etoposide, and concurrent chest radiation with or without consolidation docetaxel in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: The Hoosier Oncology Group and U.S. Oncology

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • H.Y. Chen et al.

    A five-gene signature and clinical outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • M. Machtay et al.

    Prediction of survival by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy: Results of the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial

    J Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • D.J. Raz et al.

    A multigene assay is prognostic of survival in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2008)
  • O.S. Al-Kadi et al.

    Texture analysis of aggressive and nonaggressive lung tumor CE CT images

    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng

    (2008)
  • B. Ganeshan et al.

    Texture analysis of non-small cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: Initial evidence for a relationship with tumour glucose metabolism and stage

    Cancer Imaging

    (2010)
  • T. Win et al.

    Tumor heterogeneity and permeability as measured on the ct component of PET/CT predict survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2013)
  • T. Berghmans et al.

    Prognostic factors in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A review of conventional, metabolic and new biological variables

    Ther Adv Med Oncol

    (2011)
  • M. Amadasun et al.

    Textural features corresponding to textural properties

    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern

    (1989)
  • R.M. Haralick et al.

    Textural features for image classification

    IEEE T Syst Man Cyb

    (1973)
  • Cited by (162)

    • Radiomics for Predicting Lung Cancer Outcomes Following Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review

      2022, Clinical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Only 11% of features in the final model also predicted for overall survival, however, perhaps suggesting that distant disease and patient survival may be influenced by separate elements of the underlying biological phenotype. Incorporation of texture features stable across both three- and four-dimensional CT scans ± contrast in another study improved clinical models of distant control with average classification rates of about 0.89 [49]. Although no studies explored features predictive for nodal relapse specifically following conventional radiotherapy as a primary focus, a few studies did examine features that corresponded with likelihood of ‘regional failure’, as recorded in Table 1 [46,47,49].

    • Development and Validation of a CT-Based Signature for the Prediction of Distant Metastasis Before Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

      2022, Academic Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In their research, feature selection via concave minimization (FSV) is used to select effective radiomics features, finally the selected features are mainly composed of first-order wavelet characteristics and auxiliary classification. While in our study, all radiomics features of the training cohort are standardized at first, and then the LASSO and RFE algorithm are used to select features, all selected features are high-order features, suggesting that the high-order features of the tumor can effectively assist in the diagnosis of DM (30). Although the effect of Junior's (17) radiomics model was better than that reported in our research, the sample size was inconsistent; absence of feature repeatability analyses; and independent validation may lead to unreliable results.

    • Predicting the radiotherapeutic treatment response of non-small cell lung cancer

      2022, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported in part by the American Legion Auxiliary, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Graduate Fellowship, the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, and National Cancer Institute grant R03CA178495-01. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is supported by National Institutes of Health core grant CA 16672.

    Conflict of interest: none.

    View full text