Elsevier

Injury

Volume 38, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 19-26
Injury

Health outcomes of adults 3 months after injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.05.020Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Injury is a leading cause of preventable mortality and morbidity in Australia and the world. Despite this there is little research examining the health related quality of life of adults following general trauma.

Methods

A prospective cohort design was used to study adults who presented to hospital following injury. Data regarding injury and demographic details was collected through the routine operation of the Queensland Trauma Registry (QTR). In addition, the short form 36 (SF-36) was mailed to patients approximately 3 months following injury.

Results

Participants included 339 injured patients who were hospitalised for ≥24 h in March–June 2003. A secondary group of 145 patients completed the SF-36, but did not have QTR data collected due to hospitalisation being <24 h. Both groups of participants reported significantly lower scores on all subscales of the SF-36 when compared to Australian norms.

Conclusions

Health related quality of life of injured survivors is markedly reduced 3 months after injury. Ongoing treatment and support is necessary to improve these health outcomes.

Introduction

Injury represents one of the major contributors to the public health burden in Australia. According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 6.8% of all separations from public, private and psychiatric hospitals in Australia in the 2001/2002 financial year were due to injury (including poisonings).2 This burden remains similar to that reported several years earlier in relation to the 1999/2000 financial year.14 In terms of expenditure, health care costs related to injury and poisoning accounted for 8.2% of the total allocated health expenditure in Australia in 2001/2002.2 Despite this burden, there is limited literature on the long-term outcomes of injury, including health related quality of life (HRQoL).

HRQoL has a variety of descriptions, but generally it includes ‘the dimensions of physical functioning, social functioning, role functioning, mental health and general health perceptions’.40 These dimensions are effectively measured using the SF-36 instrument.8, 38 HRQoL represents one aspect of the broader concept of quality of life. The measurement of HRQoL provides a useful method of assessing the outcomes of health interventions. It can also assist health workers in the identification of key areas to target in planning and monitoring different treatment options.

Given that injury is a leading cause of preventable mortality and morbidity in Australia and the world and a major cost to the health system,3, 5, 25, 31 the lack of research in this field is surprising. There has been minimal research in Australia examining the HRQoL of adults following injury, however there has been two series of work from the USA, one in general trauma patients and one in specific subgroups of trauma patients. Holbrook et al. identified reduced function up to 18 months post-injury, with function being worse in women when compared to men.15, 16, 17, 18 Similarly, MacKenzie et al. identified poorer health across most dimensions measured by the SF-36 1 year post-head injury and poor functional outcomes up to 7 years post-severe lower limb trauma.22, 24

This study was consequently developed to determine the HRQoL of adults 3 months post-injury. These HRQoL scores were then compared to non-injured Australian adults of the same age to determine whether the reported HRQoL was similar to the general population, suggesting the impact of injury was experienced for less than 3 months, or whether HRQoL was lower than the general population, suggesting the impact of injury persisted beyond 3 months. This study is making the assumption that the injured population did not differ from the general population prior to their injury.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A prospective cohort design was used to study people who were admitted to 1 of the 12 adult Queensland Trauma Registry (QTR) hospitals for the treatment of injury and who granted consent for follow-up post-discharge. The sample reported in this manuscript was limited to those people who met the following criteria:

  • aged 14 years or older at the time of injury;

  • coded in a category between S00 and S99 or T00 and T78 (injuries and poisonings) using the International Classification of Diseases,

Results

Initially 843 potential participants consented to be contacted regarding participation in the study (Fig. 1). Of the 843 consenting patients, 286 (33.9%) patients did not respond, while a further 58 (6.9%) questionnaires were returned as ‘unknown at that address’. Eleven potential participants were ineligible including seven patients who had died since hospital admission, one patient who had left the country, four patients who declined to participate and three patients who were unable to

Discussion

This study is one of the first in Australia using the short form 36 to assess the HRQoL of individuals hospitalised as a result of injury. The short form 36, a measure of adult health and well being that has been tested and standardised for Australian use, was chosen to obtain follow-up data from a cohort of adults admitted to 1 of the 12 Queensland Trauma Registry hospitals throughout the state. Results for the present study of HRQoL of adults following an injury, show support for the

Conclusions

In the majority of age groups the participants in this study reported lower HRQoL in the majority of subscales measured on the SF-36 approximately 3 months post-injury. The lowest scores, when compared to Australian norms, were reported in the physical, rather than psychosocial subscales. People who were injured and were admitted to hospital for less than 24 h reported similarly reduced scores on the SF-36 when compared with Australian norms.

It is evident that significant reductions in HRQoL are

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest by any authors in relation to this article.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Ms. Joan Hendrikz for her assistance with statistical analysis during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors also wish to thank the Motor Accident Insurance Commission (Qld) for the funding provided to support this research as a component of the Queensland Trauma Plan Project.

References (40)

  • G. Bono

    Whiplash injuries: clinical picture and diagnostic work-up

    Clin Exp Rheumatol

    (2000)
  • C. Cameron

    Long-term mortality following trauma: 10-year follow-up in a population-based sample of injured adults

    J Trauma

    (2005)
  • S.J. Coons

    A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments

    Pharmacoeconomics

    (2000)
  • D. Dowdy

    Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature

    Intens Care Med

    (2005)
  • M. Findler

    The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury

    Brain Injury

    (2001)
  • B.J. Gabbe

    Choosing outcome assessment instruments for trauma registries

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2005)
  • J.A. Girotto

    Long-term physical impairment and functional outcomes after complex facial fractures

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2001)
  • S.E. Hall

    Hip fracture outcomes: quality of life and functional status in older adults living in the community

    Aust NZ J Med

    (2000)
  • Helps, Y, Cripps R, Harrison J. Hospital separations due to injury and poisoning, Australia 1999–2000. Injury Research...
  • T.L. Holbrook

    Outcome after major trauma: discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project

    J Trauma

    (1998)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Difficulties in establishing long-term trauma outcomes data collections. Could trauma outcomes be routinely monitored in New South Wales, Australia: Piloting a 3 month follow-up?

      2012, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the pilot study, the data items collected were able to provide an indicator of the impact of trauma on individuals in their attempt to return to their previous level of physical functioning. The profile of the trauma population in the current study had a similar proportion of males and females and mean age of participants to other Australia trauma outcomes studies1,14,17 and the majority of trauma cases were as a result of road traffic-related trauma, again similar to other trauma outcomes research.14,17,30 Both the GOSE scale and the mean physical and mental component scores of the SF-12 showed that individuals at 3 months post-injury had a drastically reduced HRQoL compared to what might be expected in a normative or community sample.34,36

    • Challenges and possible solutions for long-term follow-up of patients surviving critical illness

      2011, Australian Critical Care
      Citation Excerpt :

      With the exception of follow-up studies of patients who had cardiac surgery, duration of follow-up in studies of critical care survivors is often short. Studies of HRQOL over the last decade describe duration of follow-up ranging from a few months29,30,32–35 to 1–2 years.6,25,36–39 Only two reports describe 5-year HRQOL, one in a general ICU population21 and the other among medical ICU patients.22

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text