ReviewOccurrence of secondary fracture around intramedullary nails used for trochanteric hip fractures: A systematic review of 13,568 patients
Introduction
A proximal femoral fracture or hip fracture is the most common reason for admission to an acute orthopaedic ward.1 Trochanteric hip fractures (AO classification 31-A) account for approximately half of all these hip fractures. The current evidence recommends the use of a sliding hip screw and plate (SHS) because of the low incidence of complications and failure, and high rates of fracture union.2 Because of perceived biomechanical advantages of intramedullary fixation, with a shorter leaver arm, intramedullary nails have been used with increased frequency for the fixation of trochanteric hip fractures.3, 4
Concerns have been raised that the incidence of fracture healing complications is increased for the intramedullary nails used in the fixation of trochanteric hip fractures in comparison to the more traditional SHS fixation.2 No difference in the incidence of cut-out of the femoral neck screw has been shown between the intramedullary nails and SHS's, and intramedullary nails avoid the complication of detachment of the plate from the femur. Other complications occurring in both groups include non-union, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, implant breakage and disassembly of the implant. However, intramedullary nails incur the risk of secondary fracture around the distal tip of the implant, which is rare after a SHS fixation with a reported incidence in a summary of randomised trials of 2/1645 (0.1%).2
The first widely available intramedullary device used in the fixation of hip fractures was the Gamma nail (Howmedica/Stryker) which was introduced in the 1980s. Design modifications have been made to this nail since then such that currently versions include the Gamma 3 nail, Trochanteric Gamma nail and the Gamma AP (Asia Pacific) nail. A recent study of the Gamma nail has suggested that the risk of secondary femoral shaft fractures is no longer increased.5 A number of other designs of proximal femoral nails have been introduced from different manufacturers. These include the intramedullary hip screw (Smith and Nephew), Proximal femoral nail (Synthes), Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (Synthes), Trochanteric fixation nail (Synthes), Holland nail (Biomet), Targon PF nail (Aesculap) and the Ace trochanteric nail (DePuy/Johnson & Johnson).
Because of the severity of this complication, which leads to either a prolonged period of traction, or revision surgery, and its possible reduction with the modification of the nail designs, we have undertaken a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published data relating to the incidence of post-operative secondary femoral shaft fractures in all types of intramedullary nails used in the management of trochanteric (AO classification 31-A) hip fractures over the last 30 years.
We identified the study population using a Medline search of the English literature from 1980 to 2010. We used the key words “extra capsular fracture” or “trochanteric fracture nail”. We also used the “related articles” feature in PubMed (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) to identify similar studies. We included all case series and randomised controlled trials, but excluded all reviews. We included data from all studies on intramedullary nailing of trochanteric hip fractures, but excluded data on operative fractures or early post-operative fractures that were attributed to a missed operative fracture of the femur, and studies of purely subtrochanteric fractures. We excluded all peri-operative fractures because we were trying to study a post-operative complication. We excluded all non-English language studies.
Two observers independently extracted the data for the population, intervention, incidence of secondary femoral shaft fracture and time from operation to secondary femoral shaft fracture from each relevant article. Differences were resolved by discussion between all three authors, and a joint review of any papers where there was a difference of opinion.
We pooled data across studies and calculated p values for each comparison using the Chi-square statistic with Yates correction for unequal variances. Statistical analysis between the groups was carried out using GraphPad InStat version 3.00 for Windows 95, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA.
Section snippets
Results
We identified 93 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We excluded 4 of these studies from the analysis because they were not commercially available and usually experimental nails developed by the individual hospitals. We included the remaining 89 studies for further analysis of their results.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57
Discussion
Post operative secondary femoral shaft fracture occurred with most types of nail. Some of the possible causes for these fractures that have been suggested in the studies we have examined include;
- •
Large distal screws used for distal locking of the nails.
- •
Large and rigid distal end of the nail causing greater stress forces, as opposed to a thinner tapered more flexible tip. Those implants made of titanium will also have greater elasticity in comparison to those made of stainless steel.
- •
Increased
Conclusions
The results of this study indicate that there is a difference in the occurrence of secondary fracture of the femur related to the design of the nail used. Most significantly that biaxial nails have a significantly lower risk of fracture than uniaxial nails. Modification to the nail design appears to be reducing the incidence of this complication, but further studies using large patient numbers are required to decide future developments in nail design, and to reduce the incidence of this
Conflict of interest
M.J. Parker has received honorarium and travel expenses from a number of commercial companies for giving lectures on different aspects of hip fracture treatment and on the design of implants used to treat proximal femoral fractures. In addition he has received royalties from B Brawn Ltd. related to the design and development of an implant used for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures. Neither of the other authors have any conflict of interest with this paper.
References (96)
- et al.
The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture
Injury
(2002) - et al.
The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN)—our first 60 cases
Injury
(2002) - et al.
Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Injury
(1995) - et al.
Experience in the use of the long Gamma nail for 16 femoral shaft fracture that have occurred following initial Asian Pacific Gamma nail fixation for pertrochanteric fractures
Injury
(2006) - et al.
Quality of life after a subtrochanteric fracture: a prospective cohort study on 87 elderly patients
Injury
(2009) - et al.
Implant failure of the gamma nail
Injury
(1999) - et al.
Radiographic outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the trochanteric fixation nail
Injury
(2007) - et al.
Pertrochanteric fractures: a randomized prospective study comparing dynamic screw plate and intramedullary fixation
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot
(2005) - et al.
Evaluation of the long intra-medullary hip screw
Injury
(2004) - et al.
Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly
Injury
(2002)
Intramedullary osteosynthesis of complex proximal femoral fractures with the Targon PF nail
Injury
Second-generation cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur
Injury
Cutting-out of the lag screw after internal fixation with the Asiatic gamma nail
Injury
The Holland nail: a universal implant for fractures of the proximal femur and the femoral shaft
Injury
The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures
Injury
IMHS clinical experience in the treatment of peritrochanteric fractures. The results of a multicentric Italian study of 981 cases
Injury
The use of the long gamma nail in proximal femoral fractures
Injury
The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures
Injury
The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study
Injury
Systematic effects of surgical treatment of hip fractures: gliding screw-plating vs intramedullary nailing
Injury
Complications associated with the use of the gamma nail
Injury
Finite element analysis of four different implants inserted in different positions to stabilize an idealized trochanteric femoral fracture
Injury
Hip fracture
BMJ
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Provider factors associated with intramedullary nail use for intertrochanteric hip fractures
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis
J Orthop Trauma
Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur
J Orthop Trauma
A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients
Acta Orthop Scand
A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Percutaneous treatment of peritrochanteric fractures using the Gamma nail
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Gamma nail versus CHS in intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures—a preliminary report of a prospective randomized study
Acta Orthop Scand
A new intramedullary nail device for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: perioperative experience
J Trauma
The proximal femoral nail (PFN)—a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months
Acta Orthop Scand
The gamma nail for pertrochanteric fractures of the femur: a prospective comparison with the dynamic hip screw
J Bone Joint Surg
The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a review of 93 cases
J Trauma
Pertrochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail: technique and report of early results
Orthopedics
Nail versus plate: a prospective randomised trial comparing the intramedullary hip screw and classic hip screw for internal fixation of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. Results after one year
J Bone Joint Surg Br
Complications associated with gamma nailing. A review of 439 cases
Acta Orthop Belg
Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comparison of two implant designs
Int Orthop
Reoperations after use of gamma nail or hip compression screw for proximal femoral fractures
J Bone Joint Surg Br
Functional outcome in treatment of unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures with the proximal femoral nail and the Medoff sliding plate
J Orthop Trauma
Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Swedish experience with the Gamma nail versus the sliding hip screw in 209 randomised cases
Int Orthop
Swedish experience of the first 209 randomized patients with Gamma nail vs. screw-plate
Acta Orthop Belg
Treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur using the gamma nail (apropos of a series of 92 cases)
Acta Orthop Belg
Cited by (113)
Short versus long intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fracture: Meta-analysis
2024, Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y TraumatologiaPeri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
2023, Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English EditionShort versus long intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fracture: Meta-analysis
2023, Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y TraumatologiaHomogenized finite element models can accurately predict screw pull-out in continuum materials, but not in porous materials
2021, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine