Elsevier

Injury

Volume 45, Issue 11, November 2014, Pages 1710-1716
Injury

Mortality in cancer patients after a fall-related injury: The impact of cancer spread and type

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Cancer patients are at an increased risk of dying following an injury, of which among the elderly is predominately caused by falling. In addition, patients with certain types of cancer are more prone to bone injury. However, studies are needed that examine the role of cancer site and metastasis on the relationship between cancer and death following traumatic injury.

Methods

A total of 4201 cancer patients from 2000 to 2009 in the Illinois Hospital Discharge and Illinois Trauma Registry, and 4201 patients without cancer met eligibility criteria (e.g., fell and were injured; 50–96 years old). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between cancer and death following traumatic injury, including models stratified by cancer site and metastasis.

Results

The demographic characteristics, prevalence of comorbid conditions, and injury severity and type did not differ substantially between patients with and without diagnoses for cancer. In the main adjusted model, patients with cancer were more likely to die during the course of hospitalization after a fall than those without cancer (OR = 2.58; CI 95%: 1.91–3.49). Patients with metastatic malignancies had a higher risk of in-hospital death than patients without metastasis (adjusted OR = 3.59 and OR = 2.18, respectively). Patients with diagnoses for all specific cancer sites, except prostate and breast, were also significantly more likely to die.

Discussion

Cancer patients with and without spread over the age of 50 years are more likely to die in-hospital after a fall than elderly patients without cancer. However, this relationship may exist only for patients with specific cancer types.

Introduction

Approximately one in three community-dwelling elderly fall each year, with reoccurrence rates between 15% and 25% [1], [2], [3]. Of those that seek medical treatment, 20–30% suffer moderate to severe injuries [4]. Nonfatal unintentional fall-related injuries are increasing dramatically [5], as are fall-related deaths. From 1999 to 2009 falls were the most common cause of death from unintentional injury in people 50 and older, and are the cause of 60–80% of all injuries in the elderly—increasing in proportion with age [5]. During this time the adjusted mortality rate increased 64% from 15.1 to 24.8 deaths per 100,000 people in this age group [6], [7]. Falls increase mortality through a variety of pathways including: pulmonary embolisms resulting from deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at the site of fractured bone, infection (e.g., from the injury, surgery, or hospital-acquired), or from surgical complications [8], [9]. Furthermore, risk of injury and death from falling increases with age, as does the incidence of many chronic conditions, which may also increase the risk of injury or complicate recovery [4], [5], [7], [10].

Cancer patients may be particularly vulnerable to decreased bone density from cancer treatments and the disease itself. Radiation can damage bone blood supply. The pelvic/hip region is one of the most vulnerable regions to suffer radiation damage, significantly increasing fracture risk [11], [12]. Hormone therapies, chemotherapy, and bone cancer (or bone cancer metastasis) can also disrupt bone-cell homeostasis leading to bone loss [13], [14], [15]. Chemotherapies and hormone therapies that can decrease bone density are used to treat a variety of cancers [14], [16]. Several studies indicate that cancer patients are at an increased risk for fracture, particularly patients with primary lung, prostate, breast, multiple myeloma, and bone cancer or patients with metastasis to the bone or other types of metastasis excluding bone [12], [17], [18], [19].

In addition to an increased fracture risk, having cancer increases the risk of in-hospital mortality after an injury from a trauma [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Only one of these studies assessed mechanism of injury [20] and found that the relationship between cancer and in-hospital mortality was only significantly higher when the cause of the injury was a fall (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.67–3.25).

The association between cancer and in-hospital morality after a trauma (e.g., a fall) may be attributed to: a disruption of normal clotting, immunodeficiency from chemotherapy, and/or an overall decrease in the patient's physical reserve [22], [24]. However, studies completed in this area have not examined the role of cancer metastasis [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Most people that die of cancer have cancer metastasis [26] and 85–90% have delirium in the days and hours before death [27], which significantly increases the risk of falling [28], [29]. Therefore, the relationship between cancer and in-hospital mortality after a fall may only exist for patients with advanced cancer, and the fall injury is simply a marker in the causal pathway of the final terminal phase of the illness.

As patients with specific cancer types are more prone to fracture, cancer type may also be an effect modifier in the relationship in question, which has not been examined in previous work [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In addition, these past studies have relied on data solely from trauma registries, which focuses on patients with more severe injuries, as patients with less severe injuries are generally not taken to trauma centers [30].

Studies are needed that include a comprehensive patient population treated in facilities with and without specialised trauma teams that is large enough to adequately assess the risk of in-hospital mortality after a fall-related injury in patients with a malignancy, as well as evaluate the role of two potentially important risk modifiers: (1) the role of advanced cancer (i.e., cancer spread) and (2) cancer type. This study, a retrospective cohort study of patients treated in hospitals with and without specialised trauma units addresses these research gaps.

Section snippets

Data source

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using two State of Illinois medical record databases: the Illinois trauma registry (ITR) and the Illinois hospital discharge (HD) dataset. We received data for years 2000–2009 for both datasets. The University of Illinois at Chicago institutional review board approved this research (approval no. 2012-0116).

Illinois trauma registry

All of the State's level 1 and 2 trauma centers (n = 62) are required to report all patients (1) sustaining traumatic injuries (ICD-9-CM external

Results

Table 1 presents demographic characteristics by cancer status. The sample was comprised of 8402 trauma patients (4201 with cancer), of which 63.3% were women. Almost 70% of the patients (n = 5862) were treated in facilities without specialised trauma care teams. The age distribution was nearly identical between cancer and non-cancer patients, except that a greater proportion of patients without cancer were in the youngest group. Race was only available in the TR; the distribution of

Discussion

In this analysis, we found that cancer significantly predicted in-hospital mortality after a fall in patients 50 and older. The strength of the association of the main model (all cancer sites combined, regardless of metastasis) was similar to those reported in prior studies which range from 1.8 to 4.8 [20], [21], [22], [23], despite that almost 70% of the patients in our study were treated in facilities without specialised trauma care teams. Patients with cancer diagnoses did not differ

Conclusion

Our study of patients 50 years and older injured from falls treated in facilities with and without specialised trauma teams confirms the relationship between cancer and in-hospital mortality reported in prior studies. Cancer site may be an important factor, as our findings identified specific cancer sites associated with differential in-hospital case fatality rates. The findings also indicate the strength of the association between in-hospital mortality and cancer diagnosis was higher in

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest that may be relevant to the submitted work.

Funding

No funding was solicited or received for this study.

Author contributions

April Toomey was directly involved with the study concept and design, statistical analysis, and drafting and editing the manuscript. Dr. Lee Friedman had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr. Lee Friedman was directly involved with the study design, data acquisition, statistical analysis, and drafting and editing the manuscript.

References (41)

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Falls among older adults: an overview

    Injury prevention & control: home and recreational safety

    (2010)
  • U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System. Nonfatal...
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Leading causes of death

    (2010)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Injury mortality reports

    (2010)
  • P. Egan

    Hip fractures in the elderly can be prevented

    (2011)
  • A. Shumway-Cook et al.

    Falls in the Medicare population: incidence, associated factors, and impact on health care

    Phys Ther

    (2009)
  • N.N. Baxter et al.

    Risk of pelvic fractures in older women following pelvic irradiation

    JAMA

    (2005)
  • S.P. Elliott et al.

    Three-dimensional external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer increases the risk of hip fracture

    Cancer

    (2011)
  • L.B. Michaud et al.

    Cancer-treatment-induced bone loss, part 1

    Am J Health Syst Pharm

    (2006)
  • R. Silbermann et al.

    Bone effects of cancer therapies: pros and cons

    Curr Opin Support Palliat Care

    (2011)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Feasibility and efficacy of a remotely delivered fall prevention exercise program for community-dwelling older adults with cancer: Protocol for the STABLE trial

      2022, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Evidence shows injurious fall rate among older adults with cancer is approximately 45% (one-quarter of which resulted in bone fractures) [20]. Injurious falls in older adults with cancer are linked to increased risk of death, poorer quality of life [21,22], and increased risk of chemotherapy toxicity [23]. Evidence also shows one in twenty falls interrupt older adults' cancer treatment regimens [20], which can have profound implications on their cancer trajectories and health outcomes.

    • Circumstances around falls in older adults with Cancer

      2021, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, falls in older adults with cancer are more likely to result in an injury; 70% of falls in patients with cancer result in injury, compared with only 10–20% in the general population [8–10]. Falls in older patients with cancer can lead to significant consequences, including decreased quality-of-life, increased dependence on caregivers and increased mortality, as they are three times more likely to die during hospitalization after a fall [8,11]. There is minimal research on the circumstances around falls in older patients with cancer, which may be because fall research studies often exclude patients with cancer, terminal conditions or other comorbidities [12–15].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text