Salvage of upper extremities with humeral fracture and associated brachial artery injury
Introduction
Amputation or near amputation of the upper extremity requiring vascular repair for salvage presents a challenging situation for the patient and surgeon. Although brachial artery injuries infrequently result in amputation [1], [2], the at-risk limb presenting with arterial injury is almost universally treated with expedient revascularization, and relative consensus exists regarding this approach [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Although many recent reports [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] of successful revascularization and limb salvage after brachial artery injury have been published, the techniques and outcomes for management of major upper-extremity trauma presenting with substantial combined bony and vascular injury have not been well studied. The purposes of this study were to show a viable option of immediate limb salvage using a treatment algorithm that consists of immediate internal fixation and determination of when emergent vascular shunting is necessary.
Variations in practice include the use of temporizing vascular shunts, multispecialty team treatment as opposed to single upper-extremity surgeon management of the injury, and external versus immediate internal fixation or even intramedullary nailing. An upper-extremity surgeon has an orthopaedic or plastic surgery background with added qualifications and training in the discipline of hand surgery. Immediate internal fixation has become the standard for treatment of open fractures in other anatomic locations, including the forearm and tibial and femoral shafts [11], [12], [13]. By contrast, many authors still advocate external fixation of open humeral fractures and for cases of arterial repair to protect the anastomosis [14], [15], [16].
We describe our approach to treating humeral fractures with associated brachial artery injury, including closed fractures, near amputations, and amputations. We also review our experience in an attempt to identify significant predictors of limb survival versus amputation. We hypothesized that we would be able to identify specific treatment variables that would be associated with a higher salvage rate, such as decreased time to revascularization by shunt use and management by an upper extremity surgeon with the ability to address all components of the injury (osteological, vascular, and neurological) at a single setting. Our secondary hypothesis was that immediate internal fixation would be safe and effective for limb salvage.
Section snippets
Study design
We studied a retrospective cohort of patients presenting with humeral fracture and associated brachial artery injury. After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, we searched the database at our level I trauma centre to identify all adult patients (older than 18 years) with this injury. The study time period extended from 1999 through 2012. To qualify for study inclusion, patients had to be followed at least to the clinical end point of limb viability (discharged with limb intact) or
Results
Thirty-eight patients met the above criteria and were included in the study (Table 1). The median patient age was 27.5 years, with an interquartile range of 22–41 years. Median follow-up was 263 days, with an interquartile range of 97–587 days. Injuries consisted of 13 penetrating gunshot injuries and 25 blunt injuries caused by motor vehicle or motorcycle collisions. Seventeen (68%) of the 25 blunt injuries were open fractures (Table 1).
Overall, 36 upper extremities were successfully salvaged
Discussion
Our study of a retrospective cohort of humeral fractures with brachial artery injury treated at a single institution provides some insight into contemporary treatment strategies and salvage rates. Although principles of early reperfusion, aggressive debridement of devitalized soft tissues, early soft-tissue coverage, and definitive internal fixation have been common practice at some institutions, the goal of our study is to better define when immediate reperfusion is needed, using absolute
Conflict of interest statement
In the past, author T.H. received money from Smith + Nephew for giving a presentation at a Smith + Nephew-sponsored meeting. He also owns stock options in Summit Med Ventures. The authors have no other potential conflicts of interest to report.
Funding source
No outside funding was received for this work.
Acknowledgment
We thank senior editor and writer Dori Kelly, MA, for professional manuscript editing.
References (28)
- et al.
A retrospective review of brachial artery injuries and repairs: is it still a “training artery”?
Injury
(2010) - et al.
An analysis of 124 surgically managed brachial artery injuries
Am J Surg
(2004) - et al.
Penetrating injuries of the brachial artery
Injury
(1995) - et al.
Civilian arterial trauma of the upper extremity: an 11 year experience in 267 patients
Am J Surg
(1984) - et al.
Upper extremity arterial injuries: factors influencing treatment outcome
Injury
(2009) - et al.
Brachial and forearm vessel injuries
Surg Clin N Am
(2002) - et al.
Traumatic injuries of the brachial artery
Am J Surg
(1988) - et al.
Temporary catheter perfusion and artery-last sequence of repair in macroreplantations
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2009) - et al.
Surgical experience with 220 acute arterial injuries in civilian practice
Am J Surg
(1960) - et al.
Traumatic arterial injuries of the upper extremity: determinants of disability
Am J Surg
(1985)
Brachial artery injuries in a rural catchment trauma center: are the upper and lower extremity the same?
J Trauma
Limb salvage after complex repairs of extremity arterial injuries is independent of surgical specialty training
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Immediate internal fixation of open fractures of the diaphysis of the forearm
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Cited by (18)
Surgical repair of brachial artery injuries
2023, JMV-Journal de Medecine VasculaireCross limb vessel transfer for salvage of the extremity with irreparable artery injury
2019, InjuryCitation Excerpt :Vascular injuries can occur in high energy injuries with complex soft tissue wounds and/or fractures [1,2].
Humeral shaft fractures
2018, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryCitation Excerpt :However, early nerve exploration with osteosynthesis is agreed upon when one of the following factors is present: open fracture, vascular injury, high-velocity gunshot injury, severe soft tissue injury, or manipulation induced secondary radial nerve injury.3,31,45,52,55 A vascular injury requiring repair is an absolute indication for operative management, because rigid fixation protects the vascular anastomosis.50 Brachial plexus injuries are considered an indication for operative management, because a nonstable fracture delays rehabilitation and bracing carries a high nonunion rate (45%).4
Use of giant-sized flow-through venous flap for simultaneous reconstruction of dual or multiple major arteries in salvage therapy for complex upper limb traumatic injury
2016, InjuryCitation Excerpt :In addition to major artery injury, impaired collateral circulation, which results from extensive soft tissue injury, significantly reduces limb tolerance to ischemia. The complex soft tissue defect also contributes to the need for limb amputation, depending on the size and depth of the soft tissue defect [20]. Therefore, limb revascularization and resurfacing are two major procedures for salvage therapy for a complex limb injury, and use of a flow-through flap is preferred as it allows concomitant reconstruction of the blood supply and soft tissue [21].
Surgical management of distal humerus gunshot fractures: descriptive case series
2023, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and TraumatologyPrimary amputation versus limb salvage in upper limb major trauma: a systematic review
2022, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology