ReportDoes hormone therapy improve age-related skin changes in postmenopausal women?: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled multicenter study assessing the effects of norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol in the improvement of mild to moderate age-related skin changes in postmenopausal women
Introduction
Deterioration of the skin with age results from a combination of factors. These include genetic and environmental factors, particularly sun exposure and smoking. For postmenopausal women, decreasing estrogen levels may play a role in skin aging. With menopause, there is declining expression of cutaneous estrogen receptors.1, 2, 3 Estrogen therapy may be prescribed to control some of the undesirable symptoms of menopause, such as vasomotor symptoms and vaginal atrophy. Common skin changes associated with menopause include atrophy, dryness, fine wrinkling, laxity, and poor wound healing. Some authors have reported that that estrogen supplementation, usually in high doses, may ameliorate some of the skin changes seen after menopause.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Others, however, were unable to confirm some of these effects.14, 15, 16 The objective of the current study was to assess the effects of 48 weeks of two low-dosage combinations of norethindrone acetate (NA) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) (1 mg NA/5μg EE and 1 mg NA/10 μg EE) compared with placebo on skin aging in postmenopausal women with mild to moderate age-related skin changes.
Section snippets
Methods
The study was randomized, double blind, double dummy, placebo controlled, and multicenter. Institutional review board approval was obtained for the study, and all patients gave their informed consent to participate. A central training program was used to standardize clinical assessments from center to center and investigator to investigator. This consisted of a full day of training in clinical assessment of photoaging in live subjects. Investigator to investigator as well as within investigator
Results
Overall, 485 subjects were enrolled in the study, 165 in the placebo group, 162 in the 1/5 NA/EE group, and 158 in the 1/10 NA/EE group. In general, subject characteristics at screening baseline appeared similar across the treatment groups (Table I). The subjects were, on average, 53.6 years old and approximately 5 years postmenopausal. Approximately 95% were white and the average body mass index was 26.3. The average follicle-stimulating hormone level at baseline was 97.3 mIU/mL, and the
Discussion
In women, declining estrogen levels are associated with a variety of skin changes, many of which are reportedly reversed or improved by estrogen supplementation. These include decreased skin thickness, collagen content and elasticity,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 increased fine wrinkling and skin dryness, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and impaired wound healing.10
This study is the first large prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of HT on facial skin aging. Surprisingly,
References (29)
- et al.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study on the effect of conjugated estrogens on skin thickness
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994) - et al.
Skin water-holding capacity and transdermal estrogen therapy for menopause: a pilot study
Maturitas
(1995) - et al.
Effect of a conjugated oestrogen (Premarin) cream on aging facial skin. A comparative study with a placebo cream
Maturitas
(1994) - et al.
Topical estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing in aged humans associated with an altered inflammatory response
Am J Pathol
(1999) - et al.
Effects of postmenopausal hypoestrogenism on skin collagen
Maturitas
(1999) - et al.
Short term effects of topical 17 Beta estradiol on human post menopausal skin
Maturitas
(1989) - et al.
Skin changes in menopause Maturitas
(1989) - et al.
Systemic therapy with estrogen or estrogen with progestin has no effect on skin collagen in postmenopausal women
Maturitas
(1997) - et al.
Skin collagen changes in post-menopausal women receiving oestradiol gel
Maturitas
(1987) - et al.
The effects of systemic hormonal replacement therapy on the skin of postmenopausal women
Int J Gynecol Obstet
(2000)
Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptor α and β
Endocrinology
Demonstration of estrogen receptors in the skin
J Endocrinol Invest
Sequence and expression of human estrogen receptor complementary DNA
Science
Does hormonal skin aging exist?
Dermatology
Cited by (40)
Oral Supplementation and Systemic Drugs for Skin Aging: A Narrative Review
2023, Actas Dermo-SifiliograficasHormone Replacement: The Fountain of Youth?
2017, Primary Care - Clinics in Office PracticeSkin aging and oxidative stress: Equol's anti-aging effects via biochemical and molecular mechanisms
2016, Ageing Research ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Finally, the relationship of menopausal status and rate of skin damage was examined. Women, who had entered menopause between baseline and 8 years, showed the highest rate of skin damage (>95% increase), suggesting that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is most effective within 5 years of menopausal (Archer, 2012; Phillips et al., 2008). Thus aging can be described as a fast moving train without any stops along the way.
Endogenous estrogen exacerbates UV-induced inflammation and photoaging in mice
2014, Journal of Investigative DermatologyAging and Anti-Aging in Hair and Hair Loss
2013, Inflammation, Advancing Age and Nutrition: Research and Clinical InterventionsNon-classical estrogen receptors action on human dermal fibroblasts
2011, Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :Inhibition of PI3 K/Akt with LY294002 successfully rescued cells from RAL-induced apoptosis (Fig. 4). Deterioration of the skin with age in women may result from many factors, including genetic and environmental factors [11]. Among these, estrogen might be one of the important factors, because declining estrogen levels are associated with a variety of skin changes in women, and the expression of cutaneous ERs is also decreased after the menopause [12].
Supported by a grant from Pfizer, Inc.
Disclosure: Dr Symons was employed in the Clinical Research Department at Pfizer Inc at the time this study was conducted. He was a member of the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, when the manuscript was written. Dr Phillips is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Hygeia Therapeutics.
Reprints not available from the authors.
- ∗
A list of the members of the HT Study Group may be found online as Appendix 1 at www.eblue.org.