Clinical Research
Clinical Trial
Prevention of Ventricular Desynchronization by Permanent Para-Hisian Pacing After Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: A Crossover, Blinded, Randomized Study Versus Apical Right Ventricular Pacing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.056Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, the safety, and hemodynamic improvements induced by permanent para-Hisian pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and narrow QRS who underwent atrioventricular (AV) node ablation.

Background

Right ventricular apical pacing, inducing asynchronous ventricular contraction, may impair cardiac function; permanent para-Hisian pacing could preserve interventricular synchrony and improve left ventricular function.

Methods

After AV node ablation, 16 patients were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker connected to a screw-in lead positioned in close proximity to the His bundle and to a right ventricular apical lead. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and after two randomized six-month periods (with para-Hisian and conventional pacing).

Results

During para-Hisian pacing, the interventricular electromechanical delay improved as well (34 ± 18 ms) as during right apical pacing (47 ± 19 ms), p < 0.05. Para-Hisian pacing allowed an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class (1.75 ± 0.4 vs. 2.33 ± 0.6 at baseline and 2.5 ± 0.4 during apical pacing, p < 0.05 for both), in quality-of-life score (16.2 ± 8.7 vs. 32.5 ± 15.0 at baseline, p < 0.05), and in the 6-min walk test (431 ± 73 m vs. 378 ± 60 m at baseline and 360 ± 71 m during apical pacing, p < 0.5 for both). Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation improved during para-Hisian pacing (1.22 ± 0.8 and 1.46 ± 0.5 index, respectively, vs. 1.68 ± 0.6 [p < 0.05] and 1.62 ± 0.7 [p = NS] index at baseline, respectively), with a slight worsening during apical pacing (1.93 ± 1 and 1.93 ± 0.7 index, respectively, p < 0.05 for both).

Conclusions

Permanent para-Hisian pacing is feasible and safe. Compared with conventional right apical pacing, it allows an improvement in functional and hemodynamic parameters over long-term follow-up.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

AF
atrial fibrillation
AV
atrioventricular
DDDR
dual-chamber rate-responsive pacing-sensing
EF
ejection fraction
ICD
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
NYHA
New York Heart Association
PM
pacemaker
QoL
quality of life
RF
radiofrequency
VVIR
ventricular rate-responsive pacing-sensing

Cited by (0)