Clinical Reaseach
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Temporal Trends and Geographic Variation of Lower-Extremity Amputation in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Results From U.S. Medicare 2000–2008

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.983Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

This study sought to characterize temporal trends, patient-specific factors, and geographic variation associated with amputation in patients with lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (LE PAD) during the study period.

Background

Amputation represents the end-stage failure for those with LE PAD, and little is known about the rates and geographic variation in the use of LE amputation.

Methods

By using data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2008, we examined national patterns of LE amputation among patients age 65 years or more with PAD. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust regional results for other patient demographic and clinical factors.

Results

Among 2,730,742 older patients with identified PAD, the overall rate of LE amputation decreased from 7,258 per 100,000 patients with PAD to 5,790 per 100,000 (p < 0.001 for trend). Male sex, black race, diabetes mellitus, and renal disease were all independent predictors of LE amputation. The adjusted odds ratio of LE amputation per year between 2000 and 2008 was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.95–0.95, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

From 2000 to 2008, LE amputation rates decreased significantly among patients with PAD. However, there remains significant patient and geographic variation in amputation rates across the United States.

Key Words

critical limb ischemia
geographic variation
lower-extremity amputation
peripheral artery disease

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CI
confidence interval
CMS
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
HRR
hospital referral region
ICD-9-CM
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification
LE PAD
lower-extremity peripheral artery disease
OR
odds ratio

Cited by (0)

This project was funded in part by internal support from the Duke Clinical Research Institute. This project also was supported on infrastructure provided by Cooperative Agreement Number U19HS021092 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Disclosures: Dr. Patel has received research grants from Johnson & Johnson, Pluristem, and Astra Zeneca; and is a consultant for Baxter, Genzyme, Bayer, and Ortho McNeil Jansen. Dr. Peterson has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb-Sanofi, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.