Research report
Overlap and distinctiveness of psychological risk factors in patients with ischemic heart disease and chronic heart failure: Are we there yet?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.05.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Growing evidence supports the importance of psychological factors in the etiology and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, this research has been criticized due to overlap between psychological constructs. We examined whether psychological questionnaires frequently used in cardiovascular research assess distinct constructs in a mixed group of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.

Methods

565 patients with CHF (n = 118) or IHD (n = 447) completed the Type D scale (DS14), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Pearson product moment correlations were computed to determine the interrelatedness between psychological constructs. Principal component analyses (PCA) were conducted on both scale scores and items to determine higher-order constructs and distinctiveness of psychological questionnaires.

Results

Two higher-order constructs were identified, namely negative affect and social inhibition. PCA on all 69 items showed that anxiety, depression, negative affectivity, and social inhibition were distinct constructs. The original structure of the DS14 was confirmed, whereas items of the HADS and BDI loaded more diffusely; items of the STAI reflected two different components.

Conclusion

The use of multiple questionnaires in cardiac patients is justified, as the higher order construct negative affect comprised different facets. Social inhibition was also shown to be a distinct construct, indicating that it may timely for cardiovascular research to look at the role of inhibition in addition to negative emotions. Future studies are warranted to determine whether these findings are replicable in other cardiac samples and to specify the unique prognostic value of these psychological facets.

Introduction

During recent years growing evidence supports the importance of psychological factors in the etiology and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (Rozanski et al., 2005), with depression, anxiety, general distress, vital exhaustion, and Type D personality having been shown to predict mortality (Frasure-Smith et al., 2000, Todaro et al., 2003, Denollet et al., 2006b), recurrent cardiac events (Kop et al., 1994), and impaired health status (Rumsfeld et al., 2003, Al-Ruzzeh et al., 2005) in patients with established heart disease independent of biomedical risk factors.

Psychological risk factors are most often assessed by means of self-report, but since psychological constructs overlap, the main criticism of research on the role of psychological factors in CVD has been that instruments might not measure distinct concepts, but reflect a higher-order construct (Suls and Bunde, 2005, Ketterer et al., 2002). Besides theoretical importance, this issue is pertinent from a clinical and epidemiological point of view, in order to avoid redundancy and to determine which instruments to use in clinical practice to identify patients with a high-risk psychological profile.

The issue of conceptual distinctiveness of psychological constructs has been addressed previously in a sample of 822 healthy working men (Kudielka et al., 2004). Depression, vital exhaustion, and negative affectivity were shown to be distinct psychological constructs, and the factor structure of the original questionnaires was underpinned. However, these findings may not be applicable to patients with established CVD. Furthermore, the issue of the examined psychological factors reflecting a higher-order construct was not addressed in the latter study (Kudielka et al., 2004). In the context of cardiac patients, few studies have evaluated whether the assessment of multiple questionnaires is redundant, with these studies having used different statistical approaches (Denollet and Brutsaert, 1998, Ketterer et al., 2002).

Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine whether psychological questionnaires frequently used in cardiovascular-research assess distinct psychological constructs, using a mixed group of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) in order to enhance generalizability across different stages of CVD.

Section snippets

Participants and procedure

The sample comprised a mixed group of 600 cardiac outpatients diagnosed with IHD or CHF recruited from Holbæk Hospital, Denmark. Final analyses were based on 565 patients (CHF: n = 118; IHD: n = 447), since for 35 patients all data on questionnaires were missing. The mean age of the total sample was 65.8 ± 10.4 years with 421 patients (74.5%) being men. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration.

Demographic and clinical variables

Demographics

Demographic and clinical characteristics

CHF and IHD patients differed on some baseline characteristics, with CHF patients being older(t (163)  = 2.50, p = .01), having a lower LVEF (t (490)  =  16.7, p < .001), more often smoking (X2(1)  = 5.69, p = .02), and more frequently having co-morbid respiratory disease (X2(1) = 7.97, p = .005) compared to IHD patients. Patient characteristics stratified by disease type, as well as for the total sample, are presented in Table 1. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

Discussion

In a mixed cardiac sample of IHD and CHF patients, we found that negative affect and social inhibition comprise conceptually different higher-order constructs, with social inhibition providing information about how patients deal with emotions (i.e. the tendency not to share these feelings with others). Factor analysis on item level showed that anxiety, depression, negative affect, and social inhibition were distinct components, assessed by means of different questionnaires. Of all

Role of funding source

Funding for this study was in part provided by a VICI-grant (453-04-004) from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), The Hague, The Netherlands, to Dr. J. Denollet the NWO had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References (36)

  • StrikJ.J. et al.

    Sensitivity and specificity of observer and self-report questionnaires in major and minor depression following myocardial infarction

    Psychosomatics

    (2001)
  • TodaroJ.F. et al.

    Effect of negative emotions on frequency of coronary heart disease (The Normative Aging Study)

    Am. J. Cardiol.

    (2003)
  • Al-RuzzehS. et al.

    Predictors of poor mid-term health related quality of life after primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

    Heart

    (2005)
  • BartlettM.S.

    A note on the multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations

    J. R. Stat. Soc. B

    (1954)
  • BeckA. et al.

    Manual for the Revised Beck Depression Inventory

    (1993)
  • CattellR.

    The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis

  • DenolletJ.

    DS14: standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and type D personality

    Psychosom. Med.

    (2005)
  • DenolletJ. et al.

    Personality, disease severity, and the risk of long-term cardiac events in patients with a decreased ejection fraction after myocardial infarction

    Circulation

    (1998)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Is Type D personality a risk factor for all-cause mortality? A prospective population-based study among 2625 colorectal cancer survivors from the PROFILES registry

      2017, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is important to note, that overlap exists regarding the constructs NA and depression, the conceptual difference lies within the fact that personality is a permanent trait while depression is a disorder and thus a temporary state [31]. Psychometrically, depressive symptoms, load on different higher-order constructs or factors than Type D personality and its sub-traits NA and SI [32] To exemplify the difference between NA and depression we performed sensitivity analyses described below. Follow-up time was calculated as the time from questionnaire completion to death or 31-12-2013 whichever came first.

    • Differences in quality of life, Anxiety and depression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and common forms of atrioventricular reentry supraventricular tachycardias

      2014, Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is preliminary evidence showing that the reliability and the validity of the Greek translation of the STAI questionnaire are generally similar to those reported in the international literature [19]. Depression was diagnosed and its severity quantified using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) that is commonly used worldwide [20,21]. Various translations of the BDI have been published and this scale was proved to be psychometrically strong and appropriate for use.

    • Type D personality in never-depressed patients and the development of major and minor depression after acute coronary syndrome

      2014, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      To elucidate the relationship between TDP and depression, previous studies, using factor analysis, found a partial overlap between NA and depression (Kudielka et al., 2004) or anxiety (Pelle et al., 2009); suggesting that NA might also measure some features of depression and anxiety rather than solely a personality disposition. This suggestion, was supported by a recent study which stressed that “NA comprises state as well as trait facets” (Pelle et al., 2009). These findings underscore the need for assessing depression and anxiety levels when TDP is evaluated as a risk factor for depression in ACS; this implies that the predictive power of TDP should be adjusted for depression and anxiety at baseline.

    • On the protective effect of resilience in patients with acute coronary syndrome

      2014, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
    • The distressed (Type D) and Five-Factor Models of personality in young, healthy adults and their association with emotional inhibition and distress

      2013, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Within the Type D construct, the NA trait refers to a stable and long-term tendency towards negative affect, while depression refers to more short-term episodes of depressed mood (Pedersen & Denollet, 2006). Psychometric investigations have shown that NA items load on a different dimension than items assessing anxiety (Pelle, Denollet, Zwisler, & Pedersen, 2009) and depression (Kudielka, von Känel, Gander, & Fischer, 2004; Pelle et al., 2009), indicating that they measure distinct psychological concepts. Other studies have shown that depression and Type D personality represent different kinds of emotional distress (Denollet et al., 2009), and that Type D predicts depression and anxiety independent of baseline depression levels (Denollet, Schiffer, et al., 2010).

    • Type D personality is independently associated with major psychosocial stressors and increased health care utilization in the general population

      2011, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      In general, Type D personality is considered a general propensity for mental distress, poor health status, reduced help seeking behavior and poor self-management among community and patient populations (Denollet et al., 2010; Mols and Denollet, 2010a,b). The Type D personality is considered as a stable, heritable, and non-psychopathological character trait (Mommersteeg et al., 2010, 2011), which could be clearly separated from mental disorders like depression (Denollet et al., 2010; Pelle et al., 2009). However, the relationship of Type D with other mental disorders has been less thoroughly studied in the general population.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychosomatic Society, March 12, 2008, Baltimore, USA.

    View full text