Elsevier

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volume 172, 1 February 2015, Pages 179-183
Journal of Affective Disorders

Research report
The utilization of unified protocols in behavioral cognitive therapy in transdiagnostic group subjects: A clinical trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The practicing of protocols based on behavioral cognitive therapy (CBT) have been frequently used in the last decades and adapted to better manage the necessities of patients and providers.

Objectives

The goal is to build a treatment that is evidence-based – for that reason the unified protocol for multiple emotional disorders (transdiagnostics) have been utilized to simplify treatment – without losing scientific traits. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the unified protocol in groups of patients with depression and anxiety disorders.

Materials and methods

In a pool of 48 subjects, divided in two groups, one was submitted to 12 intervention sessions of the unified protocol while the other was solely given medication. MINI, BAI and BDI were the instruments used at the beginning and at the end of treatment.

Results

The results were highly significant (p<0.001) in as much as with the improvement of anxiety and depressive disorders as it was in the group which was treated with the unified protocol compared with the group which was only given medication

Limitations

Limitations of this study were the number of sample participants and the non-randomization of subjects in both groups.

Conclusion

Group therapy has not been largely implemented though it is deemed very useful for treatments when the unified protocol is used in transdiagnostic patients. Not only does it allow for emotional stabilizing and socialization but it also enables subjects with an altruistic feeling amongst themselves.

Introduction

In the last thirty years, behavioral-cognitive therapy (CBT) has been achieving successful results when compared to those of other treatments (Pehlivanidis et al., 2006). The evidence of this approach varies and benefits not only patients but also physicians and other healthcare professionals due to a better assent to treatment (Pehlivanidis et al., 2006, Kraus et al., 2011, Lambert, 2013). The following benefits exist: a more accessible therapeutic relationship, techniques that provide patients with more autonomy, a treatment plan that is built up with the patient and based on goals as discussed in the therapy sessions, and the short-term behavioral changes acquired during the course of treatment (Button et al., 2012).

Research shows that since it is a direct and structured approach, the CBT has advantages as to the prognosis of treatment when it utilizes protocols (Pehlivanidis et al., 2006, Kraus et al., 2011, Lambert, 2013, Button et al., 2012). The unified protocol was created in 2011 by Barlow and colleagues and bases itself empirically on CBT. During therapy sessions, approach techniques such as psychoeducation, bibliotherapy, socratic questioning, relaxation, diaphragmatic breathing, exposure, cognitive restructuring, and training of social abilities are implemented. The purpose is to reach pre-established goals designed at the beginning of the process as well as emotional balance (de Ornelas et al., 2013, Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b). It may be utilized in either individual or transdiagnostic patient groups functioning as a guide of 12 or more therapy sessions (de Ornelas et al., 2013, Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b, Norton et al., 2014). Due to the ease of implementation, studies suggest the use of the unified protocol as an important tool to both providers and patients subjected to it (Button et al., 2012, de Ornelas et al., 2013, Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b, Norton et al., 2014).

In the psychotherapy process, the practice of the unified protocol in groups has the goal to: (1) socialize the patient to the CBT model; (2) encourage goal-setting in treatment; (3) provide a sense of mutual help amongst group members and providers; (4) identify predisposing factors that may also maintain what conflict is considered by each group member; (5) focus on what is truly desired; (6) train social and affective relation abilities; (7) allow for cognitive restructuring against dysfunctional beliefs; (8) modify behavior and (9) prevent relapses (Button et al., 2012, de Ornelas et al., 2013, Barlow et al., 2011a, Barlow et al., 2011b, Norton et al., 2014).

Studies show that when the patient undergoes a psychotherapy individual treatment as being associated with the use of medication for depression and anxiety, the results related to quality of life are inferior when compared to those of group treatment. Group treatment allows for the increase of a positive-emotions repertoire such as self-acceptance, autonomy, purpose in life, positive relationships with others, environment control, and personal growth (Leichsenring and Salzer, 2014, Wood and Joseph, 2010, Wood-Dauphinee, 1999).

In regards to pathological anxiety, studies point to several limitations to the patient׳s life and that – when exposed to a group of patients with a diversity of anxiety disorders – symptoms are similar amongst patients serving as an identifying point in common. It takes place from the threatening stimulus up to the negative avoidance behavior, freezing behavior and escape. Improvement in therapy appears to be continuous as to anxiety disorders as it was with a follow-up of a 6-month post-treatment research of a group of 37 participants diagnosed with panic, generalized anxiety, agoraphobia, and obsessive–compulsive disorders. This was prior to the unified protocol (M=30.0, SD=12.6) and after treatment (M=19.61, SD=12.1, Hedge׳s g=−0.77) which showed an evidence of continuous improvement (Boswell et al., 2013 Sep).

Studies reveal that psychoeducation and cognitive restructuring techniques, when utilized in group, afford patients with insights regarding functional anxious thinking and, furthermore, it shows that the motivational feature of the group environment might serve as a predictor of meaningful improvement in patients who seek a more socially-accepted behavior (de Ornelas et al., 2013; Barlow et al., 2011). In a research in which the group unified protocol was employed, a reduction in both depressive-related (F=78.62; p<0.001) and anxiety-related (F=19.64; p<0.001)(de Ornelas et al., 2013) symptoms was found.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of CBT unified protocols in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders of transdiagnostic patients.

Section snippets

Methodology

Forty eight patients with depressive and multiple anxiety disorders were assessed and diagnosed with the structured interview MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview) (Sheehan et al., 1998, Amorim, 2000). All of the subjects were obtained from a waiting list of 300 patients who sought psychological treatment in the county of Resende in the State of Rio de Janeiro. From the 48 patients aforementioned, 24 underwent a CBT unified group-protocol intervention and the remaining 24 were

Results

Sociodemographic data was described on Table 1, being both groups sub-divided as follows: with and without therapy, sex, education, profession, and religion. From this data, the only one that differs from the others is the level of education of the group submitted to the unified protocol therapy in which patients had a higher level of education as compared with those of the control group. The group treated with the unified protocol was favored from this result since the CBT is an approach which

Discussion

The results showed that the treatment in the form of group with the unified protocol for depression and anxiety disorders was effective thus corroborating with the current literature published (Pehlivanidis et al., 2006, Kraus et al., 2011, Lambert, 2013, Button et al., 2012, de Ornelas et al., 2013). A meta-analytic review of 35 studies compared the group CBT with the use of medication for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD); the result was similar in both interventions for CBT

Conclusion

The format of the group CBT is less frequently implemented than the individual; however, the group format may be better implemented in public environments allowing for a greater number of patients seen and for a lower cost.

Group CBT treatment when applied by means of an unified protocol may become more well-structured and simple to both providers and patients.

Role of funding source

The first author is a researcher and doctoral candidate of Department of the Institute of Psychiatry of the laboratory of panic and respiration and has monthly contribution of doctoral scholarship from CAPES, which is a Federal Government agency in Rio de Janeiro. This contribution was used to collect the data, having the procedure with the unified group Protocol, statistical analyses and writing the article.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The contribution of each author was paramount for this project and article and in the application of Mini interview as well as BAI and BDI both in patients who have undergone therapy and those in the control group (1,2,3); also crucial in the implementation of the text about the group therapy, cognitive-behavior therapy and unified protocol (1) and in revising the manuscript (1,2,3).

References (28)

  • T.D. Borkovec et al.

    Effects of psychotherapy on comorbid conditions in generalized anxiety disorder

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1995)
  • T.A. Brown et al.

    Classification of anxiety and mood disorders

  • T.A. Brown et al.

    Categorical vs. dimensional classification of mental disorders in DSM–V and beyond

    J. Abnorm. Psychol.

    (2005)
  • K.S. Button et al.

    Factors associated with differential response to online cognitive behavioural therapy

    Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Effect of a group prevention program based on the unified protocol for college students in Colombia: A quasi-experimental study

      2022, Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Alternatively, the universal character of our prevention program helps to respond to some of the barriers explaining the mental health treatment gap such as stigmatization (since intervention does not require to signal or diagnose people with higher risk) or reduced resources (Craske & Zucker, 2002; Fisak et al., 2011; Lau & Rapee, 2011; Murray et al., 2014). Similarly, the group format implies a more cost-effective intervention that could also strengthen interpersonal relationships, social learning, skill practice, and self-acceptance (de Ornelas Maia et al., 2015). The present results must be interpreted within their own limitations.

    • Unified protocol for anxiety disorders in two cities of Mexico measuring gamma activity: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

      2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Latin America, de Ornelas Maia, Braga, Nunes, Nardi & Silva applied and evaluated in Brazil the UP on patients with comorbid mood and AD, reaching high size effects on quality of life, sexuality, and anxiety/depression symptoms [8]. Also, de Ornelas, Nardi & Cardoso, achieved a high significance results by applying the UP that resulted on an evident emotional stabilization and socialization in a Brazilian sample diagnosed with anxiety and depression disorders [9]. On the other hand, the Electroencephalogram (EEG) has been found useful with functional exploration techniques of the central nervous system measuring electrophysiological activity and analyzing the brain waves across different pathologies [10,11].

    • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Unified Protocol as a transdiagnostic emotion regulation based intervention

      2019, Clinical Psychology Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      A flow diagram of the screening process is presented in Fig. 1. Of the 15 studies retained, a total of 1244 participants were measured from baseline to post-intervention across randomised control experimental designs (33%; e.g., Barlow et al., 2017), treatment response studies (33%; Bullis et al., 2015), treatment response case series studies (21%; e.g., Ellard, Deckersbach, Sylvia, Nierenberg, & Barlow, 2012), and quasi-experimental designs (13%; e.g., de Ornelas Maia, Nardi, & Cardoso, 2015). Sample sizes ranged from 3 to 616.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text