Research
Perspectives in practice
Assessment of diet quality in pregnant women using the Healthy Eating Index

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.11.028Get rights and content

Abstract

The objectives of this pilot study were to examine the diets of pregnant women and healthy women of childbearing age, to quantify their diets using the US Department of Agriculture Healthy Eating Index (HEI), and to assess the validity of the HEI in pregnancy in terms of macronutrients and micronutrients. Dietary information was prospectively collected from nonpregnant women and pregnant women at 20 to 38 weeks’ gestation using 4-day food records. Diet records were analyzed for nutrient content using computer software and for overall quality using the HEI. Differences between the groups were analyzed statistically using the Student’s t test, descriptive statistics, and χ2 analysis. The macronutrient composition of the diets and the number of food group servings were similar in both groups. The HEI scores for control (nonpregnant) and pregnant women were similar, 72.6±1.52 and 75.0±0.99, respectively, of a maximum possible score of 100. Pregnant women did not meet daily recommended intakes of micronutrients of concern in pregnancy (calcium, iron, folate) through dietary means. Dietary counseling and nutritional supplements (particularly iron and folate) may be necessary. The HEI was useful in providing a composite measure of dietary intake, but did not discern the need for vitamin and mineral supplements during pregnancy.

Section snippets

Purpose

The objective of the prospective pilot study was to examine how well the diets of nonpregnant women of childbearing age and of pregnant women compare by applying the existing USDA HEI. The validity was assessed using the existing HEI in pregnancy in terms of macronutrient and micronutrient intake requirements for pregnancy. The results from this study could help direct the development of an HEI for pregnancy.

Materials and methods

Healthy nonpregnant control women and healthy pregnant women at 20 to 38 weeks’ gestation were recruited from the general population through advertisements posted throughout the university, medical clinics, physician’s offices, and community places in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Nonpregnant and pregnant women ages 20 to 40 years with good English comprehension and a willingness to keep dietary records were included. Women with a diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus, or a

Results

Forty-nine healthy control women and 52 healthy pregnant women at 30.1±0.71 weeks’ gestation took part in the study. Previous nutrition counseling/instruction history is unknown. The demographics of the groups are provided in Table 1. The women in the control group were mostly white and were younger than those in the pregnant group (Table 1). More of the control group reached a higher education level, but because some were still students, their income did not reflect this. Only 12% of the

Discussion

The USDA HEI, in pregnant and nonpregnant women, seems to provide a useful tool for comparing the diets against the Food Guide Pyramid, but our detailed analysis of micronutrients of concern in pregnancy shows that the HEI does not discern the need for vitamin and mineral supplements during pregnancy. A Medline search did not reveal any published articles or relevant reports in which the HEI had been used to assess diet quality in pregnant women. The national food guides are designed to meet

Conclusions

We conclude that the existing USDA HEI showed how well the women followed the food guidelines, but in pregnancy, it failed to pick up micronutrient deficiencies. A new HEI for pregnancy would measure diet quality in pregnancy in relation to goals, and would need to factor in a way to assess micronutrients of special concern in pregnancy. Because outcomes of pregnancy vary depending on the mother’s prepregnancy nutritional status (3), it is also important to examine dietary needs in young women

M. E. Pick, M. Edwards, and D. Moreau are research associates, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism

References (22)

  • Position of the American Dietetic AssociationNutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2002)
  • Cited by (102)

    • Health-Related Preconception Factors: Adherence to Guidelines and Associations with Weight Status

      2022, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Women’s diet was evaluated during the year before pregnancy using a food frequency questionnaire from which a diet quality index was adapted and a diet quality score was calculated.40 Other studies in which women’s diet quality in preconception was assessed found a considerable prevalence of low scores, independent from the women’s pregnancy intention.22,41,42 Overall, data suggest that women’s diet quality before pregnancy is suboptimal and needs improvement.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    M. E. Pick, M. Edwards, and D. Moreau are research associates, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism

    E. A. Ryan is a professor, Department of Medicine, Perinatal Research Centre, Muttart Diabetes Research and Training Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

    View full text