Original StudyIdentification of Older People at Risk of ADL Disability Using the Life-Space Assessment: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Section snippets
Methods
These data are from the “Life-Space mobility in old age” (LISPE) cohort comprising 75- to 90-year-old community-dwelling people living in Muurame and Jyväskylä in Central Finland. The study design and methods have been published previously.20, 21 Briefly, a random sample of 2550 was drawn from the population register. These persons were informed about the study by a letter and interviewed over the phone to determine interest and eligibility for participation (living independently, able to
Results
The median age of the participants at baseline was 80.4 (IQR 7.4), and 62% of them were women. Median baseline LSA score was 64 (IQR 30.4) and during the 2-year follow-up, the LSA score declined 2 (IQR 22) points. Table 1 shows that at baseline, LSA scores decreased with increasing ADL disability, but the change in LSA scores over the 2 years of follow-up did not differ according to baseline ADL disability status. When accounting for ADL disability status at follow-up, lower baseline LSA scores
Discussion
Based on sensitivity and specificity analyses on the development of ADL inability during the 2-year follow-up, we defined LSA ≤52.3 as the cutoff value for life-space mobility. This cutoff point was associated with higher odds to present difficulty or inability in ADLs at baseline and with development of new difficulty and inability at the follow-up, even after adjustment for factors known to be correlated with development of ADL disability. The current cutoff score is not much different from
Conclusion
Our results suggest that restrictions and declines in life-space mobility may be early signs of increasing vulnerability for poor health outcomes in community-dwelling older people. Baseline LSA ≤52.3 was associated with markedly higher odds of developing new difficulty or inability in ADL within 2 years. In addition, an LSA decline of greater than 11.7 points over time seems meaningful to community-dwelling older people, as it was associated with higher odds to develop new difficulty or
Acknowledgments
We thank the participants for their time and effort to participate in our study. The Gerontology Research Center is a joint effort between the University of Jyväskylä and the University of Tampere.
References (29)
- et al.
Predictive validity of the classification schema for functional mobility tests in instrumental activities of daily living decline among older adults
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2010) - et al.
Life-space assessment and physical activity scale for the elderly: Validity of proxy informant responses
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2014) - et al.
“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
J Psychiatr Res
(1975) - et al.
Mobility and aging: New directions for public health action
Am J Public Health
(2012) - et al.
Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults
J Am Geriatr Soc
(2003) - et al.
Correlates of life space in a volunteer cohort of older adults
Exp Aging Res
(2007) - et al.
Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation
- et al.
Moving through greater life-space areas and objectively measured physical activity of older people
PLoS One
(2015) - et al.
Life-space constriction, development of frailty, and the competing risk of mortality: The women's health and aging study I
Am J Epidemiol
(2008) - et al.
Life-space mobility predicts nursing home admission over 6 years
J Aging Health
(2013)
Establishing a hierarchy for the two components of restricted activity
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
Assessing mobility in older adults: The UAB study of aging life-space assessment
Phys Ther
Resilience in mobility in the context of chronic disease and aging: Cross-sectional and prospective findings from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) study of aging
Test-retest reliability of the swedish version of the life-space assessment questionnaire among community-dwelling older adults
Clin Rehabil
Cited by (58)
Life-Space of Older Adults after Discharge from Skilled Nursing Facilities
2024, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationChange in four measures of physical function among older adults during lung cancer treatment: A mixed methods cohort study
2023, Journal of Geriatric OncologyCitation Excerpt :For example, the 74-year-old woman receiving chemoimmunotherapy in Fig. 3B experienced decline in only LSA at two months—which was consistent with her qualitative description—while the other measures were stable to improved. In studies of older adults living in the community, lower LSA scores are associated with subsequent development of ADL difficulty/dependence [49,50]. Compared to more traditional measures of function such as ADL, LSA is a more holistic measure as it evaluates function in the context of a person's actual environment beyond the home, and therefore reflects physical, cognitive, social, and environmental factors [51].
Psychometric properties of the MOBITEC-GP mobile application for real-life mobility assessment in older adults
2022, Geriatric NursingCitation Excerpt :Mobility is a key component of active and healthy aging. Age-related mobility limitations are associated with various adverse consequences such as cognitive decline,5 physical disability,6 falls,7 loss of independence8 and even mortality.9 Thus, maintaining physical functioning throughout the lifespan plays an important role in preventing chronic diseases or preventing their progression.
Associations Between Active Mobility Index and Disability
2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationCitation Excerpt :Our results revealed that activities linked to life-space, particularly those related to physical activity, were associated with incident disability. Restricted and declining life-space mobility is considered an early sign of incident disability.7 In addition, engagement in activities is reported to reduce the risk of disability.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland (grant 255403, Future of Living and Housing, program ASU-LIVE to TR, grant 285747 to MR) and the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture to TR and EP. The sponsors played no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.