Elsevier

Journal of Autoimmunity

Volume 23, Issue 3, November 2004, Pages 221-231
Journal of Autoimmunity

Autoantigenicity of DFS70 is restricted to the conformational epitope of C-terminal alpha-helical domain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2004.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Autoantibodies against DFS70 (Dense Fine Speckles 70) are found in 30% of Japanese atopic dermatitis patients, and less frequently in patients with other diseases. We have recently reported that they are also seen in 11% of hospital workers, but in only ∼2% of patients with systemic rheumatic disease. In this study, in order to investigate the possible pathological role of anti-DFS70 antibodies, fine epitope mapping was carried out using 93 anti-DFS70 autoantibody-positive sera. Immunoblotting using overlapping peptides failed to reveal major linear epitopes. Western blotting using various truncated proteins showed a strikingly uniform epitope distribution on a suspected tertiary structure expressed by DFS70349–435. Some sera showed reactivity only in an immunoprecipitation assay using an in vitro translated DFS70. Circular dichroism analysis revealed that DFS349–435 contains an approximately 40% alpha-helical conformation, while an overlapping, non-antigenic peptide is composed of random coiled structures. The skewed single major epitope enabled us to establish a highly quantitative ELISA for the epitope region. Antibody titers showed no significant differences between the diseased group and healthy individuals. We propose that anti-DFS70 antibody may be a natural autoantibody, which might modify or reflect the inflammatory process of various disorders.

Introduction

Autoantibodies against Dense Fine Speckles 70 (DFS70), also identical to lens epithelium derived growth factor (LEDGF) and transcription coactivator p75, were identified in 30% of Japanese atopic dermatitis (AD) patients, and less frequently in patients with asthma and interstitial cystitis [1]. We have recently reported that autoantibodies to DFS70 were seen in 11% of 597 Japanese hospital workers, who represented 54% of the antinuclear antibody-positive population, but only 1.5% of patients with systemic rheumatic disease had this autoantibody [2]. On the other hand, LEDGF, which is considered to be a secreted protein translocating into the nucleus, was initially cloned as an autoantigen of cytotoxic antibodies found in sera from patients with age-related cataracts [3] and has been found to link with various cellular processes [4]. It was shown to be a DNA-binding transcription coactivator [5], promote cell survival and enhance stress resistance in various cell lines, and induce the disassembly of gap junction of lens epithelial cells via activation of protein kinase C gamma [4], [6]. LEDGF interacts with HIV-1 integrase and mediates the chromosomal targeting of integrase [7]. The mRNA of p75 was shown to be expressed ubiquitously in a variety of tissues but was most abundant in thymus [5]. Alternative splicing of LEDGF produces a second protein product, p52, from the same gene; 325 of their N-terminal amino acid residues are identical, whereas C-terminal 205 and eight residues are different in LEDGF and p52 [4]. LEDGF and p52 show distinct nuclear distributions and cellular functions, which is considered to be due to the unique C-terminal 205 residue fragment of LEDGF/p75 [5], [7], [8], [9].

Since autoimmunity to DFS70 appears in patients with various diseases and even in healthy individuals, our interest is whether these autoantibodies are clinically relevant; whether the autoantibodies mediate any pathological processes in these patients, or alternatively, whether the appearance of anti-DFS70 antibodies is a reflection of any immunological events occurring in these patients. To find a clue to these questions, we conducted fine epitope mapping of 93 anti-DFS70-positive sera from patients with various clinical manifestations as well as those from healthy individuals.

Section snippets

Serum samples

Fifty-nine sera out of 670 sera in the serum bank of the Department of Dermatology, Nagoya University Hospital, were judged to be positive for anti-DFS70 antibody by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIF) and western blotting assay using HeLa nuclear extract [2], and were selected for further study. The gender and age for all donors are shown in Table 1, and the clinical diagnosis of the patients are shown in Table 2. Thirty-four healthy human sera containing anti-DFS70 antibody were obtained

The vast majority of anti-DFS70 positive sera did not recognize the linear continuous epitopes of DFS70

The profiles of the sera used in this study are described in Table 1, Table 2. In order to determine the fine epitope specificity of these autoantibodies, they were screened by a synthetic peptide array (Fig. 1). Series of peptides of 12 amino acid residues were synthesized with overlapping by 11 amino acids, and blotted in nitrocellulose membranes. Because a previous report [1] had shown that the autoepitope of DFS70 lies in the C-terminal 205 residues that are not shared with its splicing

Discussion

Anti-DFS70 antibodies have been recently recognized to represent a major ANA subset in the non-rheumatologic population [2], [20]. The clinical impact of DFS70 antibodies is marked by the fact that they are one of the most prevalent autoantibodies in AD reported so far [1], and that they are found in more than one half of ANA-positive healthy individuals [2]. However, detailed examinations of these autoantibodies and comparative studies regarding the clinical features of donors have not been

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Dr. Tan at Scripps Research Institute for the pET-DFS plasmid and advice, and Drs. Toshikazu Usuda and Masanari Kodera at Chukyo Hospital for supplying sera from healthy volunteers. This work was supported in part by grants 13670879 and 15591174 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (YM).

References (34)

Cited by (50)

  • Anti-DFS70 among HIV-positive individuals – A prospective study

    2018, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text