Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 38, Issue 6, June 2005, Pages 1205-1212
Journal of Biomechanics

Articular contact at the tibiotalar joint in passive flexion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.06.019Get rights and content

Abstract

The knowledge of the contact areas at the tibiotalar articulating surfaces during passive flexion is fundamental for the understanding of ankle joint mobility. Traditional contact area reports are limited by the invasive measuring techniques used and by the complicated loading conditions applied.

In the present study, passive flexion tests were performed on three anatomical preparations from lower leg amputation. Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis was used to accurately reconstruct the position of the tibia and the talus at a number of unconstrained flexion positions. A large number of points was collected on the surface of the tibial mortise and on the trochlea tali by a 3-D digitiser. Articular surfaces were modelled by thin plate splines approximating these points. Relative positions of these surfaces in all the flexion positions were obtained from corresponding bone position data. A distance threshold was chosen to define contact areas.

A consistent pattern of contact was found on the articulating surfaces. The area moved anteriorly on both articular surfaces with dorsiflexion. The average position of the contact area centroid along the tibial mortise at maximum plantarflexion and at maximum dorsiflexion was respectively 58% posterior and 40% anterior of the entire antero-posterior length. For increasing dorsiflexion, the contact area moved from medial to lateral in all the specimens.

Introduction

It has been recently observed that the tibiotalar joint is not fully conforming and that the mutual action of articular contact and ligament isometric rotation guides the physiological mobility of this joint (Leardini et al., 1999a, Leardini et al., 1999b, Leardini et al., 2000). Patterns of articular contact in unloaded conditions provide important insight in this respect, since currently only bone relative positions and ligament shape and orientation have been investigated (Leardini et al., 1999a, Leardini et al., 1999b; O’Connor et al., 1998). Prosthetic design and ligament reconstruction techniques for the human ankle joint would greatly benefit from this knowledge, as it has been for the knee (Henche et al., 1981; Benjamin et al., 1998; Iwaki et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 1998; Wu et al., 2000).

For the contact at the tibiotalar joint, many experimental studies have been reported in the literature (Beaudoin et al., 1991; Bertsch et al., 2001; Calhoun et al., 1994; Clarke et al., 1991; Curtis et al., 1992; Driscoll et al., 1994; Earll et al., 1996; Friedman et al., 2001; Hartford et al., 1995; Kimizuka et al., 1980; Macko et al., 1991; Michelson et al., 2001; Pereira et al., 1996; Ramsey and Hamilton, 1976; Steffensmeier et al., 1996; Tarr et al., 1985; Thordarson et al., 1997; Ting et al., 1987), particularly looking at the effect of joint flexion position, joint loading, and integrity of the ligaments. Most of these are limited by the invasive measuring devices, i.e. pressure-sensitive films, cartilage staining techniques, and by the loading conditions of the tested specimens. Rare data describe contact on the tibial mortise (TiM) (Kura et al., 1998), and no studies have been carried out in passive flexion, the only condition where mobility is prescribed only by the articular surfaces and the ligaments (O’Connor et al., 1998; Leardini et al., 1999a).

In the present study, a novel measurement technique, combining Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA), 3-D digitisation and surface mathematical modelling, is utilised to calculate position and size of the contact areas on both the TiM and the trochlea tali (TTa) in several joint positions along passive flexion (Leardini et al., 1999a). The issue to be investigated was that, during unloaded flexion of the tibiotalar joint, a consistent motion of the contact area occurs at both surfaces.

Section snippets

Bone position data

Three fresh–frozen skeleto-ligamentous lower leg preparations from amputation (subject age: 41–58 years), with intact capsula and ligaments, were analysed. Each specimen was inspected to check for any abnormalities or signs of osteoarthritis. The specimens were tested in the ‘flexing rig’ (Leardini et al., 1999a). In each of the tibia, fibula, talus and calcaneus, four spherical 0.8 mm diameter tantalum balls were inserted into the cortex. Starting from a rest position in maximum plantarflexion

Results

The mean and standard deviation of the distance error obtained from the method over the whole surfaces was 0.02±0.16 mm. Surface approximation alone induced a maximum distance error of 0.2 mm. The standard deviation of the distances between the balls from RSA data was 0.08 mm, whereas Faro accuracy was ±0.2 mm. Relatively large changes of λ produced x- and z-migrations of H on the domain R of about 2% and 3% of Δx and Δz.

A consistent pattern of motion of the articular contact was found in the three

Discussion and conclusions

The present study was aimed at determining whether a consistent pattern of articular contact exists at the tibiotalar joint throughout the range of passive flexion. For the first time, contact area on both the articulating surfaces, without motion altering devices and in passive conditions was calculated. For increasing extension, a single contact area moved anteriorly and laterally on both articular surfaces, in the three analysed specimens. These results confirm that the tibiotalar joint is

References (34)

  • S.K. Boyd et al.

    Joint surface modeling with thin-platesplines

    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    (1999)
  • J.H. Calhoun et al.

    A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion

    Foot & Ankle International

    (1994)
  • H.J. Clarke et al.

    Tibio-talar stability in bimalleolar ankle fracturesa dynamic in vitro contact area study

    Foot & Ankle

    (1991)
  • M.J. Curtis et al.

    Tibiotalar contact and fibular malunion in ankle fractures. A cadaver study

    Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica

    (1992)
  • H.L. Driscoll et al.

    Contact characteristics of the ankle joint

    Journal of the American Pediatric Medical Asociation

    (1994)
  • M. Earll et al.

    Contribution of the deltoid ligament to ankle joint contact characteristicsa cadaver study

    Foot & Ankle International

    (1996)
  • M.A. Friedman et al.

    The effects of adult acquired flatfoot deformity on tibiotalar joint contact characteristics

    Foot & Ankle International

    (2001)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Assessing mechanical ankle instability via functional 3D stress-MRI – A pilot study

      2019, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consequently, this facilitates peak loads at certain areas of the talus which may cause osteochondral overload. Similar observations have been described in the literature (Corazza et al., 2005; Siegler et al., 2018). Also, in our study, when regarding the mediolateral distribution of the CCA tibiotalar horizontal, we found that MAI patients show an asymmetric CCA across the talar dome (see Video 4, Supplement).

    • Analysis of surface-to-surface distance mapping during three-dimensional motion at the ankle and subtalar joints

      2018, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      These properties were studied in the past for the ankle joint using pressure sensitive Fuji film (Kimizuka et al., 1980, Calhoun et al., 1994) recording peak pressure distribution and areas of contact across the joint surfaces in different joint positions. The second component is the spatial relationship between the articular surfaces during joint motion (Corazza et al., 2005). This property may be characterized through distance maps that describe the distribution of distances between the articulating surfaces at each joint position.

    • Bone shape difference between control and osteochondral defect groups of the ankle joint

      2016, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
      Citation Excerpt :

      These injury mechanisms basically imply that the relative position and orientation of the bones as well as the biomechanical loads play specific roles in development of the lesions. It is also known that contact areas and their distributions at the tibiotalar articulating surfaces vary with respect to joint position and joint loading21–23. In case a decrease in the contact area at a specific joint position (e.g., dorsiflexion combined with inversion) occurs, contact stress may exceed the limits that can be tolerated by the joint structures and a lesion may result.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text