Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns
Introduction
Detailed knowledge of in vivo knee contact forces and the contribution from muscles, ligaments, and other soft-tissues to knee joint function is essential for evaluating total knee replacement (TKR) designs. Laboratory tests and computational models of TKRs and natural knee joints require accurate force inputs in order to physiologically replicate in vivo conditions. If available, patient-specific knee contact forces and muscle forces could be used to determine testing protocols that are truly representative of specific TKR designs, design rehabilitation protocols or predict the safety of recreational activities, and monitor recovery progress after surgery.
Knee joint forces are difficult to obtain; currently, in vivo force data from instrumented total knees are only available for a few subjects for walking, chair rising/sitting, stair ascent/descent, and other activities (D'Lima et al., 2008, D'Lima et al., 2006, Heinlein et al., 2009, Kutzner et al., 2010, Mündermann et al., 2008). Consequently, computational models are necessary to bridge the knowledge gap between the available data from the few patients with a specific implant type to patient-specific knee joint contact forces for a larger patient population and multiple TKR designs. Numerical models can be used to calculate muscle and passive structure forces simultaneously with contact forces, and thus allow a more comprehensive and systematic evaluation of knee joint loading.
The unknown validity and sensitivity of modeling assumptions to different gait patterns is illustrated by results from previous models where calculated knee joint contact forces range from 1.7 to 4.3 body weights during walking (Komistek et al., 1998, Komistek et al., 2004, Komistek et al., 2005, Morrison, 1970, Paul, 1976, Wimmer and Andriacchi, 1997). With the recent availability of data from instrumented TKRs, direct comparisons to numerical models are now possible. We have previously developed a numerical model which calculates a range or envelope of possible three-dimensional contact forces for both the medial and lateral compartments of the tibial plateau (Lundberg et al., 2009). The force envelope is intended to represent the natural physiological variability in gait, as any number of strategies could be used to balance the external moments and forces measured during gait analysis. The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the knee joint contact forces predicted by the parametric numerical model. Model validity is tested by direct comparison of the predicted contact forces to measurements from four subjects with instrumented TKRs during the stance phase of gait. Model sensitivity to abnormal gait patterns is also discussed.
Section snippets
Methods
Contact forces were calculated for four subjects (Table 1) with instrumented TKRs during the stance phase of three level walking trials (Mündermann et al., 2008). Kinematics and kinetics (Fig. 1) were measured simultaneously with telemetric force data during gait analysis. A previously developed mathematical model was used to calculate TKR contact forces (Lundberg et al., 2009). The mathematical model is fully three-dimensional (Fig. 2) and calculates six contact force components in total,
Results
From the four subjects measured in the gait lab, one subject (subject 3) had different knee flexion angle, sagittal plane external moment, and frontal plane external moment patterns than the other three subjects (Fig. 1). The knee flexion angle pattern reflected a “stiff knee gait”. The sagittal plane external moment was a “quadriceps avoidance” pattern where an extension moment was present throughout stance (Andriacchi, 1993). The frontal plane external moment was higher for subject 3 than the
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the knee joint contact forces predicted by a parametric numerical model and to investigate the sensitivity of the model to abnormal gait patterns. The mean normal contact force profile from the calculated model force envelope compared well with the measured force for three of the subjects with normal gait patterns. Subject 3, walking abnormally, had the least similar measured and calculated mean force profile. When the model assumptions were
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose that could inappropriately bias our work.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mr. Chris Dyrby, Dr. Darryl D’Lima, Ms. Idubijes Rojas, Dr. Katherine Boyer, Dr. Michel Laurent, Mr. Robert Trombley, and Dr. Sean Scanlan for their assistance. This work was supported by grants from the NIH: R01 AR059843 (MAW), R03 AR052039 (MAW), T32 AR052272 (D.R. Sumner), and F32 AR057297 (HJL). The study sponsors had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the
References (34)
- et al.
Muscle activation pattern and gait biomechanics after total knee replacement
Clinical Biomechanics
(2003) - et al.
Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty
(2006) - et al.
ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6–10 months
Clinical Biomechanics
(2009) - et al.
Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity
Clinical Biomechanics
(2007) - et al.
Knee mechanics: a review of past and present techniques to determine in vivo loads
Journal of Biomechanics
(2005) - et al.
Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects
Journal of Biomechanics
(2010) - et al.
Simultaneous prediction of muscle and contact forces in the knee during gait
Journal of Biomechanics
(2010) - et al.
A parametric approach to numerical modeling of TKR contact forces
Journal of Biomechanics
(2009) The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking
Journal of Biomechanics
(1970)- et al.
Tractive forces during rolling motion of the knee: implications for wear in total knee replacement
Journal of Biomechanics
(1997)
Functional analysis of pre and post-knee surgery: total knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruction
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
The Mark Coventry Award: in vivo knee forces during recreation and exercise after knee arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanism
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Changes in in vivo knee loading with a variable-stiffness intervention shoe correlate with changes in the knee adduction moment
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Cited by (39)
Principles of biomechanics and tissue regeneration
2023, Cartilage Tissue and Knee Joint Biomechanics: Fundamentals, Characterization and ModellingA subject-specific finite element musculoskeletal framework for mechanics analysis of a total knee replacement
2018, Journal of BiomechanicsAlterations of musculoskeletal models for a more accurate estimation of lower limb joint contact forces during normal gait: A systematic review
2017, Journal of BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :In all the selected studies, the muscle paths were enhanced by via points only (15) or with (9) the use of wrapping surfaces. A majority of studies (17 out of 24) solved the muscle redundancy problem (also called the force distribution problem (Crowninshield and Brand, 1981)) through an inverse dynamics-based optimisation, while some others used a forward dynamics-based optimisation (Guess et al., 2014), an EMG-driven method (Manal and Buchanan, 2013), a reduction method (Lundberg et al., 2013, 2012), computed muscle control method (Hast and Piazza, 2013; Thelen et al., 2014), or a mixed approach (Walter et al., 2014). Proposed objective functions included the sum of muscle activations, or musculo-tendon forces, at different power, both weighted and not.
Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?
2017, Journal of ArthroplastyCitation Excerpt :The parametric model calculates a range of contact force solutions resulting from variation of relative muscle activation levels. The model has been extensively validated against instrumented total knee axial forces in a blinded and unblinded fashion [22,25]. Axial force profiles for each activity will be reported as the mean of all solutions at each of 100 instances of the activity cycle, averaged across all available trials for each activity.
Muscle co-contraction around the knee when walking with unstable shoes
2015, Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyComputational modelling of knee implants
2014, Computational Modelling of Biomechanics and Biotribology in the Musculoskeletal System: Biomaterials and Tissues