Elsevier

Joint Bone Spine

Volume 74, Issue 6, December 2007, Pages 523-526
Joint Bone Spine

Editorial
TNFα antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis patients seen in everyday practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.10.002Get rights and content

Section snippets

Effectiveness of TNFα antagonist therapy

TNFα antagonist therapy was effective in numerous clinical trials in patients with recent-onset or established RA. Although no comparative studies have been published to date, the three currently available TNFα antagonists seem similar in terms of efficacy, with response rates of 55%–80% for ACR20, 45%–65% for ACR50, and 35%–40% for ACR70 [2], [3], [4]. The results are best when the TNFα antagonist is combined with another drug, chiefly methotrexate. Although 40% of patients can expect to

Reasons for TNFα antagonist therapy discontinuation

Lack of efficacy and side effects explain similar proportions of treatment discontinuation [17], about 10%–30% for each. The remaining third is ascribable to financial reasons and to personal preferences of patients and physicians. Among RA patients who were switched to a second TNFα antagonist for lack of efficacy or toxicity, the hazards ratio of discontinuing the second drug for the same reason as the first was about 2 [18]. On the other hand, etanercept continuation rates were higher in

Side effects

The risk of infection is increased about twofold in RA patients overall and increases further with TNFα antagonist therapy [20]. In clinical therapeutic trials, the risk of infection was slightly higher with anti-TNFα antibodies given in combination with methotrexate, with about 5–6.5 serious infections/patient-year. The main reason for combining methotrexate with TNFα antagonist therapy is that efficacy is greater with combination therapy. In observational cohorts, the risk increase was

Dosage adjustment and treatment continuation

An important question is whether TNFα antagonist therapy reduces glucocorticoid requirements and/or the overall cost of RA management. Study reports have supplied little information on a possible glucocorticoid-sparing effect. The methotrexate–etanercept combination may decrease glucocorticoid requirements, perhaps at the expense of greater NSAID use [28]. Decreasing the etanercept dosage may diminish the cost of treatment and reduce side effects. Overall, the cost of TNFα antagonist treatment

Future limitations

The high prevalence of infection with the hepatitis B and C viruses requires routine screening, as chronic carriers may be at risk for reactivation after the introduction of TNFα antagonist therapy [30]. Administration of an antiviral drug such as lamivudine may reduce the risk of reactivation. Other viral infections (e.g., herpes) may be increased and require specific surveillance.

In patients who want to become pregnant, TNFα antagonist therapy should be stopped, as proof of safety for the

References (35)

  • T. Sokka et al.

    Eligibility of patients in routine care for major clinical trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents in rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2003)
  • A. Zink et al.

    Effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in an observational cohort study: comparison of patients according to their eligibility for major randomized clinical trials

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006)
  • M. Duclos et al.

    Retention rates of tumor necrosis factor blockers in daily practice in 770 rheumatic patients

    J Rheumatol

    (2006)
  • R. Westhovens et al.

    The safety of infliximab, combined with background treatments, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and various comorbidities: a large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006)
  • L.E. Kristensen et al.

    Impact of concomitant DMARD therapy on adherence to treatment with etanercept and infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a six-year observational study in southern Sweden

    Arthritis Res Ther

    (2006)
  • A. Finckh et al.

    Evidence for differential acquired drug resistance to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2006)
  • O. Brocq et al.

    Etanercept–infliximab switch in rheumatoid arthritis 14 out of 131 patients treated with anti TNFalpha

    Presse Med

    (2002)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Associations of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms FokI and BsmI with susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and Behçet's disease in Tunisians

      2012, Joint Bone Spine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Th1 phenotype is associated with inflammation, whereas the Th2 phenotype tends to have antiinflammatory effects. The pathogenesis of RA rests on a dual hierarchy of proinflammatory factors and autoimmunity involving both Th1 cells and the proinflammatory cytokine TNFα [6,7]. An excess of proinflammatory cytokines with a relative deficiency in antiinflammatory cytokines creates a Th1-Th2 imbalance, which is a characteristic of many autoimmune diseases (known as Th1 diseases) including RA, diabetes mellitus, and Behçet's disease (BD).

    • Outcome and safety of TNFα antagonist therapy in 475 consecutive outpatients (with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthropathies) treated by a single physician according to their eligibility for clinical trials

      2010, Joint Bone Spine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the effectiveness analysis included 435 patients. Effectiveness [1] was assessed semi-quantitatively [23], given the retrospective study design and fluctuations in RA and SpA activity in individual patients [24,25]. The data in correspondence to the patients’ usual physicians were used to classify patients into four subgroups, as follows: very good response (DAS28-ESR usually less than 3.2 and BASDAI usually improved by more than 60% or less than 2.0); satisfactory response (DAS28-ESR usually between 3.2 and 4.0 and BASDAI usually improved by more than 30% or lower than 4.0); fair response (DAS28-ESR between 4.0 and 5.1 and BASDAI usually improved by less than 30% or between 4.0 and 5.0); and failure (DAS28-ESR usually unchanged or greater than 5.1 and BASDAI usually unchanged or worsened).

    • Regulatory T cells (Treg) in rheumatoid arthritis

      2009, Joint Bone Spine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Under this hypothesis, targeted treatments act predominantly or secondarily via indirect effects on Treg cells. Variations in the efficacy of targeted treatments may be related in part to the Treg status of the patients, which remains to be determined [30]. Activation or reactivation of Treg cells in patients with RA may restore the balance of the immune response and halt the inflammatory process, thereby preventing further disease.

    • Regulatory T-cells (Treg) in rheumatoid arthritis

      2009, Revue du Rhumatisme (Edition Francaise)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text