Elsevier

Journal of Business Research

Volume 63, Issue 12, December 2010, Pages 1342-1348
Journal of Business Research

Adolescent consumption autonomy: A cross-cultural examination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Adolescents are an important market segment globally not only for their spending power as adolescents but also for their future spending power as adults. One variable that impacts current and future spending power is the degree to which adolescents are autonomous consumers. This study reports on depth interviews conducted with adolescent girls in France and the United States for the purpose of identifying dimensions of adolescent consumption autonomy based on adolescents' perceptions. Four dimensions of adolescent consumption autonomy are identified, including attitudinal, emotional, functional and financial. Similarities and differences between the two cultures are discussed, and implications for marketing and future research are identified.

Introduction

Many marketers have recognized the benefit of targeting teens and their large discretionary spending power (Quart, 2003). But another important aspect of adolescent consumers is that the teenage years represent a developmental stage in which teens are achieving autonomy (Noom et al., 2001) not only as individuals transitioning to adulthood but also as consumers learning how to navigate the contours of the global market by themselves. Thus, autonomy, which can be defined as being independent or self-governing (Spear and Kulbok, 2004), is a particularly relevant variable for understanding adolescent consumers. To date, however, consumer socialization research has considered only briefly the role that autonomy plays in the acquisition of the consumer role, despite calls for a deeper understanding of children's abilities to make decisions in an adult-like manner (Roedder-John, 1999).

Given the emergence of a global teen market, the need to understand adolescent consumption autonomy and the degree to which adolescents are socialized to be autonomous consumers also is salient from a cross-cultural perspective. Global teens are thought to be similar in terms of their consumption habits with respect to such things as clothing, music, and media (Kjeldgaard and Askegaard, 2006). Consequently, the global teen market is sometimes considered to be the prototypical example of a global segment (Hassan and Katsanis, 1991). This presumed uniformity, however, may be inaccurate. Recent research suggests that adolescent consumers adapt global consumption practices and meanings to fit local contexts (Kjeldgaard and Askegaard, 2006). Consistent with this finding is a handful of cross-cultural studies that report significant differences in consumer socialization practices between highly individualistic cultures (e.g., Western cultures) and strongly collectivist cultures (e.g., Eastern cultures) (Kim et al., 2009, Rose, 1999, Rose et al., 2002a, Rose et al., 2002b). Similarly, autonomy is considered to be a universal concept that may vary due to contextual factors related to culture (Helwig, 2006, Spear and Kulbok, 2004). For example, a family environment that promotes and values self-direction and internal control is more likely to positively facilitate the development of autonomy than one that emphasizes conformity and obedience to authority (Erikson, 1968).

The aim of this study is to identify dimensions of adolescent autonomy in a consumption context using a cross-cultural sample. A clear definition of adolescent autonomy related to consumption does not exist in the literature, nor has a cross-cultural approach to examining adolescent consumption autonomy been undertaken. These issues are examined by conducting depth interviews with 15 to 18 year old teenage girls in the U.S. and France. The study focuses on adolescent girls because, relative to teenage boys, they are the primary shopping spenders in this age group in both the U.S. and France (Market Research Portal, 2004).

Section snippets

Adolescent autonomy

There is no universally accepted definition of what it means to be an autonomous adolescent consumer. Bristol and Mangleburg (2005) examined American adolescents' tendencies to deceive parents with respect to their purchase behaviors, grounding the research on the notion that teens attempt to establish greater independence from their parents by engaging in behaviors that their parents would not approve. Lueg et al. (2006) examined how events in teens' lives, such as dating and getting a job,

Cross-cultural differences related to adolescent autonomy

Salient to the current research is the likelihood of cultural variations in achieving autonomy depending on social norms, values and parental socialization (Spear and Kulbok, 2004). Comparisons of individualistic cultures to strongly collectivist cultures show that societies, as well as parents, differ in the degree to which they restrict their adolescents' behavior and encourage autonomy (Rose, 1999).

Cultural differences between France and the U.S. suggest there may be differences in how

Method

Because there is no universally accepted definition of adolescent consumption autonomy across cultures, a qualitative method was employed to uncover emic issues of society more readily and to allow a rigorous comparative analysis of data (Kjeldgaard et al., 2006, Nevid and Sta Maria, 1999).

Results

In order to develop a preliminary definition of adolescent consumption autonomy, dimensions across both cultures were identified. A cross-cultural comparison was then conducted to examine cultural variations. Excerpts are denoted with “F” or “A” to indicate the informants as French or American, respectively.

Discussion and implications

This study makes two major contributions. First, four dimensions of adolescent consumption autonomy, grounded in interviews with adolescent girls, were identified. Moreover, because the dimensions emerged from a two-country sample, the construct is more robust. Three of the four dimensions–attitudinal, emotional and functional–echo autonomy dimensions established in the psychology literature. However, examining autonomy in a consumption context revealed one additional dimension, financial, and

References (46)

  • T. Bristol et al.

    Not telling the whole story: teen deception in purchasing

    J Acad Mark Sci

    (2005)
  • L. Carlson et al.

    Parental style and consumer socialization of children

    J Consum Res

    (1988)
  • M. Cleveland et al.

    Acculturation to the global consumer culture: scale development and research paradigm

    J Bus Res

    (2006)
  • R.J. Cohen

    What qualitative research can be

    Psychol Mark

    (1999)
  • P. Courbe

    Les personnes, la famille, les incapacités

    (2007)
  • S.P. Craig et al.

    International marketing research

    (2005)
  • G. Dworkin

    The theory and practice of autonomy

    (1988)
  • M. Easterby-Smith et al.

    Cross-cultural collaborative research: towards reflexivity

    Acad Manage J

    (1999)
  • E.H. Erikson

    Identity: youth and crisis

    (1968)
  • Fosse-Gomez MH. La participation de l'adolescent aux prises de décisions économiques de la famille. Thèse de doctorat...
  • E. Gentina

    L'autonomie: Un concept clé pour comprendre l'adolescente consommatrice

  • M. Gollety

    Lorsque parents et enfants s'apprennent mutuellement à consommer

    Décis Mark

    (1999)
  • H.D. Grotevant et al.

    Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence

    Child Dev

    (1985)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Young children's consumer agency: The case of French children and recycling

      2020, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This research stream indicates that parents who encourage their children to develop autonomy while maintaining positive emotional bonds help children achieve a more stable sense of self (Steinberg, 1990). Consumer researchers interested in agency, empowerment, and/or autonomy have mainly focused on teenage or adult consumers (Palan, Gentina, & Muratore, 2010). Adolescents engage in consumption activities such as dating or shopping with friends.

    • A social comparison theory approach to mothers’ and daughters’ clothing co-consumption behaviors: A cross-cultural study in France and Japan

      2018, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such collectivistic values are fundamentally important in Japanese children's socialization processes. In contrast, parents from Western and individualistic cultures promote independent self-reliance and assertiveness, encouraging children to express their own ideas (Gentina, Butori, Rose, & Aysen, 2014; Palan, Gentina, & Muratore, 2010). As a result, teenagers learn to become agents who influence their parents through various sophisticated strategies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text