Original Research ArticleInterscan reproducibility of computer-aided epicardial and thoracic fat measurement from noncontrast cardiac CT
Introduction
Epicardial fat volume (EFV) and thoracic fat volume (TFV) can be routinely quantified from noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scans performed for coronary calcium scoring.1, 2 EFV measured from noncontrast CT is associated with a higher coronary calcium score, coronary artery disease severity, biochemical markers of systemic inflammation, and increased risk of future adverse cardiovascular events.1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Direct measurement of EFV can be challenging because of reliance on detection of the thin pericardium. As more data support the clinical use of EFV, it is important to establish the reproducibility of quantifying epicardial adipose tissue.
Historically, coronary artery calcium scanning has been performed on electron beam CT (EBCT) scanners and currently is performed with multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners. While our previous results showed interobserver reproducibility of epicardial and thoracic fat from a single scan, interscan reproducibility (intrascanner [MDCT-MDCT] and interscanner [EBCT-MDCT]) of EFV quantification from noncontrast CT have not yet been determined.1, 14 Therefore, the aim of our current study was to determine the interscan reproducibility of epicardial and thoracic fat measurements from non-contrast CT.
Section snippets
Patient population
From a cohort of patients without known coronary artery disease enrolled in the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis using Non-invasivE Imaging Research) registry at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, we retrospectively analyzed 48 consecutive patients who underwent 2 noncontrast CT scans for coronary calcium scan on the same day. Of these 48 patients, 25 had both scans obtained with the same 4-slice MDCT scanner (first scan with MDCT, second scan with MDCT; “Intrascanner”),
Results
Interobserver variability was similar for MDCT and EBCT. With MDCT, the interobserver variability was 8.8% ± 3.9% for EFV and 5.5% ± 4.3% for TFV. With EBCT, interobserver variability was 9.8% ± 4.2% for EFV and 2.3% ± 2.5% for TFV.
Table 2 summarizes the interscan reproducibility results. Correlations for interscan measurements of EFV and TFV were high for both intrascanner (MDCT-MDCT) and interscanner (EBCT-MDCT) data (all correlation coefficient values ≥0.98). RC values were lowest (4.3% for
Discussion
Our group previously showed high interobserver reproducibility of epicardial and thoracic fat from a single scan.1, 14 The present study shows a high degree of reproducibility of same and cross-observer measurements of epicardial and thoracic fat from noncontrast CT, including between EBCT and MDCT.
The volume of epicardial fat measured on noncontrast cardiac CT has been associated with coronary atherosclerosis and its pathophysiology, including associations to coronary artery disease severity,
Conclusion
We demonstrated a high degree of interscan reproducibility of epicardial and thoracic fat measurements for both when scans were performed only on MDCT and between EBCT and MDCT. The interscan reproducibility reported in our study will help in the establishment of a lower limit for significant changes in the CT measurement of epicardial fat, an emerging risk marker for coronary artery disease and future adverse cardiovascular events.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant number R21EB006829-01A2 (principal investigator: Damini Dey) from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), and also in part by a grant from the Glazer Foundation (IRB 6318). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIBIB or the NIH.
References (25)
- et al.
Computer-aided non-contrast CT-based quantification of pericardial and thoracic fat and their associations with coronary calcium and metabolic syndrome
Atherosclerosis
(2010) - et al.
Pericardial fat burden on ecg-gated noncontrast CT in asymptomatic patients who subsequently experience adverse cardiovascular events
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
(2010) - et al.
Pericardial fat accumulation in men as a risk factor for coronary artery disease
Atherosclerosis
(2001) - et al.
Association between non-subcutaneous adiposity and calcified coronary plaque: A substudy of the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis
Am J Clin Nutr
(2008) - et al.
Clinical significance of epicardial fat measured using cardiac multislice computed tomography
Am J Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Increased pericardial fat volume measured from noncontrast CT predicts myocardial ischemia by spect
J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging
(2010) - et al.
Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems
Acad Radiol
(2003) - et al.
Lipid profile, plasma apolipoproteins, and risk of a first myocardial infarction among asians: an analysis from the Interheart Study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2009) - et al.
Total and visceral adipose-tissue volumes derived from measurements with computed tomography in adult men and women: predictive equations
Am J Clin Nutr
(1988) - et al.
Automated quantitation of pericardiac fat from noncontrast CT
Invest Radiol
(2008)
Pericardial and visceral adipose tissues measured volumetrically with computed tomography are highly associated in type 2 diabetic families
Invest Radiol
Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: Association with metabolic risk factors in the framingham heart study
Circulation
Cited by (0)
Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.