Stenting or Surgery for De Novo Common Femoral Artery Stenosis

Abstract

Objectives

The TECCO (Traitement des Lésions Athéromateuses de l’Artère Fémorale Commune par Technique Endovasculaire Versus Chirurgie Ouverte [Endovascular Versus Open Repair of the Common Femoral Artery]) trial is a randomized comparison of safety and efficacy of stenting versus open surgery for de novo common femoral artery (CFA) stenosis.

Background

Surgery for CFA lesions is considered effective and durable. Despite the widespread use of endovascular repair for infrainguinal disease, the value of this procedure for such lesions is uncertain.

Methods

From February 23, 2011, to September 5, 2013, a total of 117 patients with de novo atherosclerotic lesions of the CFA were randomly assigned to undergo surgery (n = 61) or stenting (n = 56). The main exclusion criteria were asymptomatic disease, restenosis, and thrombosis of the CFA. The primary outcome was the morbidity and mortality rate within 30 days. This includes any general complications or local complications that caused or prolonged hospitalization and/or re-intervention, lymphorrhea of more than 3 days, and post-operative paresthesia that required drugs. The median duration of follow-up was 2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 19.8 to 24.9 years).

Results

Primary outcome events occurred in 16 of 61 patients (26%) in the surgery group and 7 of 56 patients (12.5%) in the stenting group (odds ratio: 2.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.9 to 6.6; p = 0.05). The mean duration of hospitalization was significantly lower in the stenting group (3.2 ± 2.9 days vs. 6.3 ± 3 days; p < 0.0001). At 24 months, the sustained clinical improvement, the primary patency rate, and the target lesion and extremity revascularization rates were not different in the 2 groups.

Conclusions

In patients with de novo atherosclerotic lesions of the CFA, the perioperative morbidity and mortality rate was significantly lower among patients who underwent endovascular therapy by stenting compared with surgery, whereas clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic outcomes were comparable at mid-term. (Traitement des Lésions Athéromateuses de l’Artère Fémorale Commune par Technique Endovasculaire Versus Chirurgie Ouverte [Endovascular Versus Open Repair of the Common Femoral Artery] [TECCO]; NCT01353651)