Original contributionCan ultrasound be useful for predicting the size of a left double-lumen bronchial tube? Tracheal width as measured by ultrasonography versus computed tomography
Introduction
Double-lumen endobronchial tubes are used to isolate and/or to collapse the lungs selectively during thoracic procedures. A left-sided double-lumen tube (LDLT) is preferred for both right- and left-sided procedures, and it can be used successfully in more than 98% of patients [1]. An LDLT should be positioned accurately because a misplaced or an improperly used tube can jeopardize the procedure or injure the patient. One of the most important steps in avoiding complications associated with endotracheal tubes (ETTs) is choosing an appropriate-sized LDLT. If the ETT is too large, it will cause cuff overinflation and serious tracheal trauma. If the ETT is too small, it will be easily dislocated with malposition [2], [3], [4]. Brodsky et al found a direct correlation between tracheal and bronchial widths, and that measurement of the tracheal width from a chest radiograph was a useful guide in determining which LDLT size to select [5], [6], [7]. The trachea, because of its relatively superficial position, is easily visible by ultrasonography [8]. Recently, we and others described ultrasonography as a useful supporting method for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy placement, especially in difficult cases [9], [10]. One of the advantages of ultrasonography included preprocedural measurement of the tracheal transversal outer diameter (OD) so that an adequate size of tracheostomy tube can be determined (Fig. 1) [11]. We hypothesized that tracheal width as measured by ultrasonography correlated with tracheal width that was measured by multislice computed tomography (CT), and that ultrasonography can also be a useful method for predicting the size of an LDLT.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The investigation was designed in two independent, prospective, observational clinical studies (Study 1 and Study 2), with two groups of elective adult thoracic surgery patients. All patients were informed preoperatively of the research and provided their informed, written consent to participate. The protocol was approved by the Ethical University Board of University Hospital Rijeka.
Results
Patients from Study 1 and Study 2 did not differ with regard to age (61 ± 13.4 vs 58 ± 11.6 yrs), gender (male 56% vs male 60%), or BMI (25 ± 3.3 vs 26 ± 2.6).
Discussion
Various methods have been proposed to determine proper LDLT size. Brodsky et al showed that direct measurement of tracheal diameter at the interclavicular plane from the preoperative conventional anterior-posterior chest radiograph can be used as a guide to predict the correct LDLT size [5], [7]. However, Chow et al found that the measurement of tracheal diameter from a chest radiograph is less reliable in patients who are of small stature [13]. They and others suggested CT as a possible
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Zeljko Bosnjak, PhD, for his assistance.
References (19)
- et al.
Left double-lumen tubes: clinical experience with 1,170 patients
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
(2003) - et al.
The relationship between tracheal width and left bronchial width: implication for left-sided double-lumen tube selection
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
(2001) - et al.
Tracheal width and left double-lumen tube size: a formula to estimate left-bronchial width
J Clin Anesth
(2005) - et al.
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy under ultrasound guidance
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1999) - et al.
Computed tomography-based tracheobronchial image reconstruction allows selection of the individually appropriate double-tube size
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
(1999) - et al.
Evaluation of an approach to choosing a left double-lumen tube size based on chest computed tomographic scan measurement of left mainstem bronchial diameter
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
(1997) - et al.
Measurement of left mainstem bronchus using multiplane CT reconstructions and relationship between patient characteristics or tracheal diameters and left bronchial diameters
Chest
(2006) Methods of lung separation
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
(2002)- et al.
Margin of safety in positioning modern double-lumen endotracheal tube
Anesthesiology
(1987)
Cited by (61)
Bedside Ultrasound: The Silent Guardian for Upper Airway Assessment and Management
2024, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRIRole of ultrasonography in upper airway assessment: A comparison with computerized tomography measurements
2023, American Journal of Emergency MedicineUltrasound for Assessment and Follow-up of Airway Stenosis
2022, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Before the procedure, US provided an accurate evaluation of stenosis measurements similar to that obtained by standard exams such as CT and endoscopy. Other authors have confirmed the ability of US for assessing the diameter of the airway when compared with magnetic resonance imaging10 and/or CT scan11,12 for predicting the adequate size of endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula to be used. After stent insertion, US correctly diagnosed the migration and the obstruction of the airway stent as migration and obstruction with accuracy similar to that of CT and endoscopy.
Airway ultrasonography - Need for structured training curriculum, quality standards, and competencies assessment
2021, Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical CarePrediction of Double-Lumen Tube Size By Ultrasonography for Asian Women: A Prospective Observational Study
2021, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular AnesthesiaCitation Excerpt :In a recent study by Roldi et al., the accuracy of the left DLTs predicted by ultrasonography was 86.2%.20 In both studies, the size of the left DLT was predicted by the tracheal width measured by ultrasonography, and the accuracy of the DLTs was determined by assessing the fit of the bronchial segment.19,20 However, as shown in previous studies, the cricoid cartilage is the narrowest portion of the adult trachea and the cricoid diameter is an important determining factor of the appropriate DLT size in female adults.21
Ultrasonography for airway management
2021, Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine