Original Research
Comprehensive Echocardiographic and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Evaluation Differentiates Among Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients, Hypertensive Patients, and Healthy Control Subjects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.022Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of a comprehensive imaging protocol including echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis and differentiation of hypertensive heart disease and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Background

Hypertension is present in up to 90% of patients with HFpEF and is a major etiological component. Despite current recommendations and diagnostic criteria for HFpEF, no noninvasive imaging technique has as yet shown the ability to identify any structural differences between patients with hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 112 well-characterized patients (62 with HFpEF, 22 with hypertension, and 28 healthy control subjects). All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise and biomarker testing and an imaging protocol including echocardiography with speckle-tracking analysis and cardiac magnetic resonance including T1 mapping pre- and post-contrast.

Results

Echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) and extracellular volume (ECV) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance were the only variables able to independently stratify among the 3 groups of patients. ECV was the best technique for differentiation between hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF (ECV area under the curve: 0.88; GLS area under the curve: 0.78; p < 0.001 for both). Using ECV, an optimal cutoff of 31.2% gave 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity. ECV was significantly higher and GLS was significantly reduced in subjects with reduced exercise capacity (lower peak oxygen consumption and higher minute ventilation–carbon dioxide production) (p < 0.001 for both ECV and GLS).

Conclusions

Both GLS and ECV are able to independently discriminate between hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF and identify patients with prognostically significant functional limitation. ECV is the best diagnostic discriminatory marker of HFpEF and could be used as a surrogate endpoint for therapeutic studies.

Key Words

cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
heart failure
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
hypertension
speckle tracking
T1 mapping

Abbreviations and Acronyms

AUC
area under the curve
BNP
B-type natriuretic peptide
CI
confidence interval
CMR
cardiac magnetic resonance
CPEX
cardiopulmonary exercise testing
ECV
extracellular volume
e′
mitral annular early diastolic velocity
E/e′
early mitral inflow velocity/mitral annular early diastolic velocity
EF
ejection fraction
eGCS
echocardiographic global circumferential strain
eGLS
echocardiographic global longitudinal strain
GCS
global circumferential strain
GLS
global longitudinal strain
HF
heart failure
HFpEF
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
LGE
late gadolinium enhancement
LV
left ventricular
OR
odds ratio
VE/VCO2
minute ventilation–carbon dioxide production
Vo2
oxygen consumption

Cited by (0)

Dr. Dawson has received a research agreement from Philips Healthcare; and a material transfer agreement from AMAG Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.