Correction of secondary vermilion notching deformity in unilateral cleft lip patients: Complete revision of two errors
Introduction
Secondary deformities in cleft lip patients who have undergone primary cheiloplasty are not uncommon. Recent advances in clinical research and surgical techniques have reduced the need for secondary revision procedures; however, secondary deformities of cleft lip are still prevalent (Mommaerts and Nagy, 2008, Schwenzer-Zimmerer et al., 2008). Notching deformity (whistle deformity) is one of the most common secondary deformities (Stal and Hollier, 2002) after primary cheiloplasty. Notching deformities are often thought to be confined to the vermilion, and surgeons tend to restrict their efforts by correcting them within the vermilion using a local mucosal flap. Dermofat grafts or fascia grafts on a notching area may also be attempted (Chen et al., 1995, Patel and Hall, 2004, Wakami et al., 2010). However, these procedures may cause unwanted scars or otherwise produce suboptimal outcomes.
The authors assumed that notching deformities arise because of two errors during primary cheiloplasty, and that notching can be corrected by revision of these errors. First, vermilion notching may occur when the oral lining of the medial flap is lengthened insufficiently. This occurs when the symmetry of the cupid’s bow is achieved by rotation and sufficient lengthening of cutaneous side, but the lengthening of the oral lining is relatively shorter. This causes a tethering of the mucosal flap of the oral lining, creating a notch.
The second error is medailly deflected marking of the height of cupid’s bow. When the height of cupid’s bow is determined on cleft side, the marking should be at the thickest point of the vermilion. If the location of marking of the height of cupid’s bow on the cleft side is determined by using the same length as measured between the oral commisure and the height of cupid’s bow on the noncleft side, the vermilion of the lateral flap usually becomes thinner than the medial flap, creating a notching deformity.
The authors have obtained satisfactory results after complete revision of notching deformities in unilateral cleft lip patients by correcting the two errors.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
From 1987 to 2009, a total of 104 patients with unilateral secondary notching deformities underwent surgery. Their ages ranged from 5 years to 64 years, and the median age was 13 years. Of these patients, 12 had undergone previous secondary deformity correction at other clinical facilities, but with suboptimal results.
Most operations were performed under general anaesthesia, and in some adult patients monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) was used. First, the height of cupid’s bow on the cleft side
Results
The follow-up period ranged from 1 year to 12 years. The patients were generally satisfied with the aesthetic outcome and there were no particular complications. Seven out of 104 patients (6.7%) experienced lateral vermilion bulging, which was easily corrected by an elliptical excision.
Discussion
Focusing on the cutaneous aspect during primary cheiloplasty may attain cutaneous symmetry; however, lip tightening or vermilion notching deformity may develop (Baek and Lee, 2009). The lips are a three-dimensional structure, and cutaneous lengthening by rotation must be performed concurrently with lengthening of the oral lining. With our methods of primary cheiloplasty, transpositioning of the medial mucosal flap into the central oral lining allowed lengthening of the oral side, and vermilion
Conclusion
The authors performed satisfactory revision cheiloplasty on patients with secondary vermilion notching deformities of unilateral cleft lip. This was accomplished by sufficient lengthening of the medial oral lining, and by taking the white roll with the greatest vermilion fullness as the standard point of the height of cupid’s bow on the cleft side.
Conflict of interest
The authors received no financial support from any company or sources, and have no commercial association or financial relationships to disclosure.
References (9)
- et al.
Analysis of the cleft lip-nose in the submental-vertical view. Part II. Panel study: which is the most important deformity?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2008) - et al.
Free dermis-fat graft to correct the whistle deformity in patients with cleft lip
Br J Plast Surg
(2004) - et al.
Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia)
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2008) - et al.
Rectangular mucosal flap with artificial dermis grafting for vermilion deformity in cleft lips
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2010)
Cited by (9)
Secondary cheiloplasty in the treatment of cleft lip and palates
2019, Annales de Chirurgie Plastique EsthetiqueThe use of SymNose for quantitative assessment of lip symmetry following repair of complete bilateral cleft lip and palate
2014, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Vermillion notching or ‘whistle deformity’ is a common complication of cleft lip repair, occurring after primary cheiloplasty in patients with UCL. Lee et al. (2011) recently described a revision technique involving the sufficient lengthening of the medial oral lining, and taking the white roll with the greatest vermilion fullness as the standard point of the height of cupid's bow on the cleft side. Good aesthetic outcomes were expressed as those deemed satisfactory by the patient, and were achieved in all cases.
Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public
2013, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The frequency is approximately 1 in 700 live births (Mossey et al., 2009) and correction involves prolonged treatment over many years (Witt and Marsh, 1997). A variety of surgical techniques and modifications have been described regarding cleft lip and palate (CLP) treatment (Salyer, 1986; Thomson and Reinders, 1995; Lazarus et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2011). However, patients still seem to have concerns about their facial appearance, especially related to the cleft deformity (Marcusson et al., 2002; Sinko et al., 2005).
Mandibular premolar autotransplantation in cleft affected patients: The replacement of congenital missing teeth as part of the cleft patient's treatment protocol
2013, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Even if the transplant should fail at a later stage, an intact recipient area may be preserved by the transplant and could subsequently be used to accommodate an osseointegrated implant, a porcelain fused to a metal bridge or a partial denture (Reisberg, 2000). Recently several articles in the literature have concerned facial perception (Meyer-Marcotty et al., 2011; Schwenzer-Zimmerer et al., 2008), the available treatment techniques in cleft affected patients for better facial appearance and function such as secondary correction of bilateral cleft lip nose deformity (Nakamura et al., 2011) and improvement of the technique for correction of secondary vermilion notching deformity (Lee et al., 2011). Autotransplantaion of extracted mandibular premolars in cleft affected patients, as presented in this article, can contribute to the dentofacial aesthetic aspect of such patients.
Unilateral cleft lip repair: Assessment of outcome of olokun-olaitan vermillion flap approach
2018, Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryCorrection of whistle deformity using autologous free fat grafting: first results of a pilot study and review of the literature
2017, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery