Further experience with the free soleus perforator flaps using CT-angiography as a planning tool – A preliminary study
Introduction
With the introduction of perforator flaps by Koshima and Soeda (1989) and the description of supramicrosurgery by Koshima (Koshima et al., 1998), almost any region of the body can be used as a donor site to harvest skin flaps with minimal invasiveness. Among these, the soleus perforator flap was proposed for reconstructions of the head and neck, especially the oral cavity, and for defect cover on the extremities (Tsai et al., 2002, Wolff et al., 2004, Kawamura et al., 2005, Wolff et al., 2006, Kim et al., 2010). Despite its thinness, pliability and the minimal morbidity associated with flap raising, it has until now failed to become a routine procedure in reconstructive surgery. The main reason for its limited use is the variation in size, course and location of the perforator. The selection of the most suitable perforator is usually made intra-operatively, sometimes leading to a wide exposure and prolonged operation time. As a consequence, the surgeon might face an anastamosis on vessels with a diameter of less than 1 mm. When starting the operation without proper planning, the only suitable perforator that is exposed might have its origin too far distally in the leg, so that primary closure becomes impossible even in small flaps. In these cases, the need for a skin graft would significantly increase the donor site morbidity. It has been suggested that Doppler imaging could be used to predict the exact location of the perforator (Rand et al., 1994, Iida et al., 2003), however this gives no reliable information about size and course of the vessels (Satoh et al., 2011).
The aim of this preliminary study was to determine the suitability of CT-angiography (CTA) to visualise the side branches of the peroneal artery to allow identification of the most suitable perforator for raising the soleus perforator flap. We especially wanted to investigate if this technique can provide reliable information about the diameter, course, location, and length of the perforators. We also compared the vascular anatomy of both sides to make selection of the most appropriate donor leg possible.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
We identified 20 consecutive patients with Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma (buccal, floor-of-mouth or tongue) for whom we felt the soleus perforator flap would potentially provide the best reconstruction (Fig. 1). Each patient underwent a high resolution CT-angiography study. The CTA acquisition parameters were 120 kV and 150 mAs, with a tube rotation speed of 0.3 s (table pitch, 1.2) at a 256-slice MSCT (multislice computed tomography) Brilliance iCT (Philips Healthcare, Netherlands). The
Results
Eight of the twenty patients were not suitable for the soleus perforator flap due to arteriosclerosis (2), missing (1) or very fine (2) perforators or perforators which were exclusively located at the distal third of the calf (3). Thus, only 12 patients were selected for perforator flap surgery. We found that perforators could only be visualised on the scan if the diameter was at least 1 mm intra-operatively, however we determined that 1.5 mm was the minimum diameter to allow successful
Discussion
In contrast to traditional soft tissue flaps, which with their straightforward raising procedures lead to high success rates in reconstructive surgery, perforator flaps have the disadvantage of a variable vascular anatomy and a pedicle which is short and of small calibre. On the other hand, the raising of these flaps leads to a negligible donor site morbidity, and the flaps are thin and pliable, making the ideally suited for head and neck reconstruction. It is known from numerous clinical and
Conclusion
From the results of our preliminary study, both preconditions for successful flap raising can be examined with CT-angiography, namely the quality and the location of the flap pedicle. There were deviations of up to 2 cm between CTA and clinical findings, however preoperative imaging always provided sufficient information which finally led to successful flap raising in all cases deemed suitable. Although further technical improvements in CTA imaging may lead to even more detailed measurements, we
Conflict of interest
All authors disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this work. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest including employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.
References (30)
- et al.
Doppler flowmetry in the planning of perforator flaps
Br J Plast Surg
(1998) - et al.
Preoperative assessment of anterolateral thigh flap cutaneous perforators by colour Doppler flowmetry
Br J Plast Surg
(2003) - et al.
Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle
Br J Plast Surg
(1989) - et al.
The efficacy of preoperative mapping of perforators in reducing operative times and complications in perforator flap breast reconstruction
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2009) - et al.
The early use of a perforator flap of the lateral lower limb in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2006) - et al.
Technique and strategy in anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery, based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial failures in 439 cases
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2002) - et al.
Vasculature of the peroneal artery: an anatomic study focused on the perforator vessels
J Reconstr Microsurg
(2003) - et al.
Clinical applications of free soleus and peroneal perforator flaps
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2005) - et al.
Reliability of handheld Doppler in planning local perforator-based flaps for extremities
Aesthetic Plast Surg
(2007) - et al.
Supermicrosurgery in peroneal and soleus perforator-based free flap coverage of foot defects caused by occlusive vascular diseases
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2010)
Paraumbilical perforator flap without deep inferior epigastric vessels
Plast Reconstr Surg
Septocutaneous perforators of the peroneal artery relative to the fibula: anatomical basis of the use of pedicled fasciocutaneous flap
Surg Radiol Anat
Color-flow duplex scanning in the preoperative assessment of TRAM flap perforators: a report of 32 consecutive patients
Plast Reconstr Surg
Angio computed tomography preoperative evaluation for anterolateral thigh flap harvesting
Ann Plast Surg
Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve operative outcomes in breast reconstruction?
Microsurgery
Cited by (12)
Dimensions of perforator flaps on the lower leg depending on localization
2022, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The soleus perforator flap is harvested from the proximal and middle thirds of the lateral aspect of the lower leg, and the peroneal perforator flap is harvested from the middle and distal thirds of the lateral aspect of the lower leg.7 Successful reconstructions have been performed for both flaps, and both flaps may represent an alternative to the radial forearm flap.8,9 Nevertheless, little is known about the flap dimensions, such as the thickness and volume of both flaps.
Perforator flaps from the lower leg for intraoral reconstruction: Experience of 131 flaps
2018, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :In 24 patients, the Doppler signal did not fit with the intraoperative position of perforators. For a more precise evaluation of the lower leg perforators, colour Doppler ultrasound (Feng et al., 2016) and CT angiography (Bhattacharya et al., 2012; Wolff et al., 2012a) have been proposed. In a prospective study, accuracy in terms of identifying and locating the perforators was higher for the colour Doppler ultrasound technique when compared with CT-angiography (Feng et al., 2016) or handheld Doppler (Lethaus et al., 2017).
Harvesting technique of chimeric multiple paddles fibular flap for wide oromandibular defects
2016, Annales de Chirurgie Plastique EsthetiquePerforator flaps: The next step in the reconstructive ladder?
2015, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The role of preoperative perforator mapping using CT angiography compared with conventional Doppler in the successful harvest of antero-lateral thigh flaps: a comparative prospective study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2011),22,23 near infrared spectroscopy24 or colour-coded Duplex sonography25 have been suggested. These methods have been proved to detect perforators in at least 95% of cases.
Role of CT Angiography in Reliability of Distally Based Hemisoleus Muscle Flap for Lower Third Leg Defects
2022, Al-Azhar International Medical JournalReconstruction of Diabetic Foot Defects with the Proximal Lateral Leg Perforator Flap
2019, Annals of Plastic Surgery