The orbit first! A novel surgical treatment protocol for secondary orbitozygomatic reconstruction
Introduction
The goal of orbitozygomatic complex (OZC) fracture treatment is three-dimensional restoration of the disturbed anatomy and reconstruction of orbital volume (Kellman and Bersani, 2002, Buchanan et al., 2012, Liu et al., 2013). In case of a comminuted fracture or a combination of an OZC fracture with a naso-orbito-ethmoid fracture, accurate restoration of transversal dimensions and subsequent reconstruction of the orbit can be challenging (Kelley et al., 2007, Li et al., 2011, He et al., 2012, Liu et al., 2013). Possible sequelae of inaccurate repositioning of the zygomatic complex are hemifacial widening, malar flattening and enophthalmos (Westendorff et al., 2006, Kelley et al., 2007, Kaufman et al., 2008, Yu et al., 2010).
If secondary reconstruction is indicated, an osteotomy of the OZC may be performed in order to mobilize the OZC and move it to its anatomical position (Kellman and Bersani, 2002, Buchanan et al., 2012). Orbital reconstruction is generally performed after repositioning of the OZC and therefore depends on the realized position of the OZC. Secondary restoration of OZC architecture is acknowledged to be a difficult procedure: anatomical landmarks are frequently lost due to bone remodelling, an effort to reconstruct has already been undertaken and there is no guarantee of an optimal outcome of the secondary reconstruction (Watzinger et al., 1997, Kellman and Bersani, 2002, Westendorff et al., 2006, Kelley et al., 2007, Lu et al., 2012).
In this technical note, a treatment protocol is described for secondary orbitozygomatic reconstruction. The surgical sequence has been reversed: the orbital reconstruction is performed before repositioning of the OZC. A surgical plan is made, which utilizes patient-specific computer-aided designing. To perform orbital reconstruction and guide the OZC repositioning, a novel idea has been developed using the position of screw holes of the primary reconstruction. These screw holes are implemented in the design of a cutting guide, for accurate osteotomy, and two patient-specific implants. These modalities have been combined with intra-operative navigation.
Section snippets
Virtual planning: mirroring
Pre-operatively, a Computed Tomography (CT) scan is acquired, with a dental navigation splint for intra-operative navigation registration (Venosta et al., 2014, Gander et al., 2015). The CT data are exported in DICOM format and subsequently imported in the iPlan software (version 3.0.5; Brainlab AG, Feldkirchen, Germany). The unaffected orbitozygomatic complex (OZC) is segmented and mirrored to the affected side (Metzger et al., 2007, Scolozzi and Terzic, 2011, Liu et al., 2013). The mirrored
Results
The workflow was utilized in two subsequent patients who were referred to the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Academic Medical Centre for secondary orbitozygomatic reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were inadequate primary reconstruction of the OZC fracture, with resulting enophthalmos and facial asymmetry, and the use of osteosynthesis material at the infraorbital rim and zygomaticomaxillary buttress. CT scans were acquired for pre-operative planning and imported in iPlan.
Discussion
Secondary reconstruction of the orbitozygomatic complex is difficult in all circumstances (Westendorff et al., 2006). A first effort to anatomically reconstruct the OZC has already been undertaken and introduces additional scarring and may be other iatrogenic lesions. A malpositioned orbitozygomatic complex generally requires re-osteotomization to reposition it to a correct anatomical position (Kellman and Bersani, 2002). Computer-assisted surgery planning allows virtual restoration of the OZC (
Conclusion
A novel surgical treatment sequence for secondary orbitozygomatic complex reconstruction is described. Reconstruction of the orbit is performed first with the use of a patient-specific implant. This ensures true-to-original reconstruction of orbital anatomy. The screw hole positions in the PSI coincide with the fixation screws used in the primary reconstruction. Using old screw holes simplifies positioning of the implant itself. It also enables the PSI to be used as a static guide for OZC
Conflict of interest
None.
References (22)
- et al.
Predictability in orbital reconstruction. A human cadaver study, part III: implant-oriented navigation for optimized reconstruction
J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg
(2015) - et al.
Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures
J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg
(2015) - et al.
Orbitozygomatic fractures with enophthalmos: analysis of 64 cases treated late
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2012) - et al.
Delayed and secondary repair of posttraumatic enophthalmos and orbital deformities
Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am
(2002) - et al.
Experimental research of accurate reduction of zygomatic-orbitomaxillary complex fractures with individual templates
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
Digital surgical templates for managing high-energy zygomaticomaxillary complex injuries associated with orbital volume change: a quantitative assessment
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2013) - et al.
Increasing the accuracy of orbital reconstruction with selective laser-melted patient-specific implants combined with intraoperative navigation
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2015) - et al.
“Mirroring” computational planning, navigation guidance system, and intraoperative mobile C-arm cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detector: a new rationale in primary and secondary treatment of midfacial fractures?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
Evaluation of two dental registration-splint techniques for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery
J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg
(2014) - et al.
Computer-aided navigation in secondary reconstruction of post-traumatic deformities of the zygoma
J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg
(1997)
Navigation-guided reduction and orbital floor reconstruction in the treatment of zygomatic-orbital-maxillary complex fractures
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Cited by (18)
Accuracy of surgical navigation for patient-specific reconstructions of orbital fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryReconstructive Surgery
2023, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryPrimary reconstruction of combined orbital and zygomatic complex fractures with patient-specific milled titanium implants – A retrospective study
2022, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Most of the studies regarding patient-specific implants for patients with facial fractures have focused on internal orbit reconstructions after isolated orbital fractures (Rana et al., 2015; Kärkkäinen et al., 2018; Chepurnyi et al., 2019). Recent studies have also presented patient-specific implant use in secondary zygomaticomaxillary complex and orbit reconstructions (He et al., 2012; Schreurs et al., 2017; Falkhausen et al., 2021) but currently no previous studies exist concerning patient-specific milled titanium implants in primary reconstruction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with significant orbital wall involvement that would include postoperative assessment of both orbital volume and zygomatic fragment dislocation with 3D analysis tools. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare postoperative outcomes between patients treated with patient-specific milled titanium implants and standard implants for primary surgical reconstruction of combined orbital and zygomaticomaxillary fractures.
Critical appraisal of patient-specific implants for secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstruction
2022, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The key to success in orbital reconstruction with a PSI may lie in the freedom in design it provides. A unique, compelling fit can be designed, and positioning according to the plan may be further controlled by navigation rulers and markers, the use of positioning guides, or a rim extension17–19,29,40. Other design options can be used to tailor the implant to the pathology of the patient, such as a volume overcorrection, or can enable zygomatic reduction and orbital reconstruction in a one-stage orbitozygomatic reconstruction19,20,31,41.
Clinical outcome of patients with orbital fractures treated with patient specific CAD/CAM ceramic implants – A retrospective study
2021, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryAdvanced Diagnostics and Three-dimensional Virtual Surgical Planning in Orbital Reconstruction
2021, Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America