Diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality of kidney cancer: A meta-analysis,☆☆,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.01.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Diabetes is associated with increased risk of a spectrum of cancers, but there are few meta-analyses on the association between diabetes and kidney cancer. We performed a meta-analysis of case–control studies and cohort studies to address the incidence and mortality of kidney cancer in diabetes.

Methods

Studies were identified by searching PubMed database and manual assessment of the cited references in the retrieved articles. Study-specific relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effect model. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.

Results

A total of 24 studies were included. We found that diabetes was significantly associated with increased risk of kidney cancer (RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.69), and the results were consistent between case–control and cohort studies. A slightly stronger positive relation was observed in women (RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.83) than in men (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.48). Additional analyses indicated that the increased risk of kidney cancer was independent of alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI)/obesity and smoking. However, there was no association between diabetes and mortality of kidney cancer (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.20), without heterogeneity (P = 0.419, I2 = 1.8%).

Conclusions

Diabetes mellitus may increase the risk of kidney cancer in both women and men.

Introduction

Cancer is one of major causes of death in the world and an estimated 12.7 million new cancer cases and 7.6 million cancer deaths occurred annually, in which approximately 271,000 new cases of kidney cancer were diagnosed (Jemal et al., 2011). However, the aetiology of kidney cancer remains largely elusive, although increased risk of the disease has been reported in subjects who have an older age, and are cigarette smokers, overweight and obese (Ljungberg et al., 2011). A number of studies have found that diabetes mellitus (DM) confers a higher risk of cancer, notably of breast cancer (Larsson, Mantzoros, & Wolk, 2007), colorectal cancer (Jiang et al., 2011), pancreatic cancer (Ben et al., 2011) and endometrial cancer (Friberg, Orsini, Mantzoros, & Wolk, 2007). Several hypotheses on biological mechanisms have been proposed to explain the plausible causal association between DM and risk of cancer. In additional to the increased risk of incident cancer, DM may also increase the risk of all-cause mortality among people with cancer (Barone et al., 2008). It is suggested that abnormal metabolism, including hyperglycemia (Yang & Chan, 2012) and hyperinsulinemia (Rosta, 2011), may promote cancer development. Although a large number of epidemiological studies have investigated the association between diabetes and kidney cancer, there are few meta-analyses addressing the association between DM and kidney cancer, especially mortality from kidney cancer. The only meta-analysis of 9 cohort studies between diabetes and risk of kidney cancer did not include case–control studies, did not consider the association between DM and kidney cancer mortality and did not control for the factors such as geographic area, diabetes ascertainment, study quality and alcohol consumption (Larsson & Wolk, 2011).

This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively summarize results from published cohort and case–control studies to provide a more precise estimate of the association between diabetes and incidence and mortality of kidney cancer with study design, diabetes ascertainment, study quality and potential confounders being taken into consideration.

Section snippets

Retrieval of studies

We conducted a literature search of PubMed database (January 1960 through February 2012, human, published in the English language) for cohort and case–control studies evaluating the effect of diabetes on the risk of kidney cancer with the following medical subject heading terms and / or text words: ‘diabetes or diabetes mellitus’, combined with ‘kidney cancer’, ‘renal cell cancer or renal cell carcinoma’. In addition, we reviewed the reference lists of retrieved articles and recent reviews. Two

Characteristics of the subjects in selected studies

Detailed search procedures are summarized in Fig. 1. All the full text of the 29 identified articles was retrieved for detailed evaluation. Of them, 5 articles were further excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria, including 2 studies with univariate analyses only (Goodman et al., 1986, Wang et al., 2012), 1 study being on type 1 diabetes only (Zendehdel et al., 2003), and 2 studies (Lindblad et al., 1999, Washio et al., 2007) being already included in other two retrieved articles (

Discussion

Our meta-analysis suggests that DM may increase risk of kidney cancer by about 40%. The summary estimates of RR were consistent in cohort studies and case control studies, and in North America and in Asia, although we failed to detect a significant association in studies conducted in Europe. The positive association was stronger for total or unspecified kidney cancer than for renal cell carcinoma, indicating that diabetes may have different effects on parenchyma and renal pelvis. The positive

References (58)

  • E.A. Atchison et al.

    Risk of cancer in a large cohort of U.S. veterans with diabetes. International Journal of Cancer

    Journal International du Cancer

    (2011)
  • L.A. Bach et al.

    Insulin-like growth factors and diabetes

    Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews

    (1992)
  • B.B. Barone et al.

    Long-term all-cause mortality in cancer patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2008)
  • A. Colao et al.

    The association of fasting insulin concentrations and colonic neoplasms in acromegaly: A colonoscopy-based study in 210 patients

    Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

    (2007)
  • S.S. Coughlin et al.

    Diabetes mellitus as a predictor of cancer mortality in a large cohort of US adults

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (2004)
  • J.B. Douglas et al.

    Serum IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio and risk of pancreatic cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial

    Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: A publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology

    (2010)
  • M. Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    BMJ (Clinical research ed)

    (1997)
  • M.M. Engelgau et al.

    The evolving diabetes burden in the United States

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (2004)
  • E. Friberg et al.

    Diabetes mellitus and risk of endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis

    Diabetologia

    (2007)
  • M.T. Goodman et al.

    A case–control study of factors affecting the development of renal cell cancer

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1986)
  • S. Greenland

    Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature

    Epidemiologic Reviews

    (1987)
  • L.G. Hemkens et al.

    Risk of malignancies in patients with diabetes treated with human insulin or insulin analogues: A cohort study

    Diabetologia

    (2009)
  • K. Hemminki et al.

    Risk of cancer following hospitalization for type 2 diabetes

    The Oncologist

    (2010)
  • J.P. Higgins et al.

    Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

    Statistics in Medicine

    (2002)
  • M. Inoue et al.

    Diabetes mellitus and the risk of cancer: Results from a large-scale population-based cohort study in Japan

    Archives of Internal Medicine

    (2006)
  • S.H. Jee et al.

    Fasting serum glucose level and cancer risk in Korean men and women

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2005)
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Global cancer statistics

    CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

    (2011)
  • Y. Jiang et al.

    Diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

    European Journal of Epidemiology

    (2011)
  • H.K. Joh et al.

    Type 2 diabetes and the risk of renal cell cancer in women

    Diabetes Care

    (2011)
  • Cited by (78)

    • The biological and pharmacological connections between diabetes and various types of cancer

      2021, Pathology Research and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Their results revealed that the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for kidney cancer in individuals suffering from diabetes mellitus compared to the general ones was 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2–1.6) for males and 1.7 (95% CI: 1.4–1.9) for females [66]. Through a meta-analysis, including a total of 18 studies, it has been shown that kidney cancer has a positive link with diabetes (relative risk (RR): 1.40; 95% CI: 1.16–1.69) [67]. A research performed in China, for instance, found that diabetes individuals had a substantially increased risk for kidney cancer (SIR: 1.6 (1.3–2.0) in men and 1.7 (1.3–2.3) in women) [68].

    • Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review

      2021, European Urology Focus
      Citation Excerpt :

      This suggests that these risk factors are not strongly predictive of kidney cancer or that they are strongly associated with other included risk factors. This conflicts with the existing literature, which suggests that hypertension and diabetes have an independent positive association with kidney cancer, although in the case of diabetes this has not been well characterised [12,35,37,38]. None of the biomarker risk factors were included in more than one study (although some are used in two models developed in the same study [25]).

    • Diabetes and kidney cancer risk among post-menopausal women: The Iowa women's health study

      2021, Maturitas
      Citation Excerpt :

      The latest meta-analysis by Bao et al. (2013), which summarized findings from 11 cohort and 7 case-control studies, also reported a positive association between diabetes and an increased risk of kidney cancer that remained after adjustment for BMI. Similar to the meta-analysis by Larsson et al. (2011), the association was stronger in females [RR (95% CI) = 1.47 (1.18, 1.83)] versus males [RR (95% CI) = 1.28 (1.10, 1.48)] [14]. In parallel to our study, the Vitamin and Lifestyle study found a significant association in unadjusted but not in multivariable-adjusted model [HR (95% CI) = 1.39 (0.92, 2.09)] [28], while the population-based case-control study in Taiwan found no association in either unadjusted or multivariable-adjusted model [29].

    • Type 2 diabetes mellitus predicts worse outcomes in patients with high-grade T1 bladder cancer receiving bacillus Calmette-Guérin after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor

      2020, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
      Citation Excerpt :

      The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has sharply increased worldwide over the past few decades, with an estimated 642 million affected people expected by 2040 [6]. Recently, several studies have shown that T2DM can increase the risk of several cancers, including urological neoplasm's such as BC (Relative risk [RR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18–1.43) [7,8] and kidney cancer (RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.16–1.69) [9]. On the other hand, there is a controversy regarding the prognostic role of T2DM in diabetic people diagnosed with cancer, with a potential negative influence of T2DM reported in some tumors—e.g., breast cancer [10], and conflicting results obtained in others [11,12].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Author Contributions: C. B. extracted data, analyzed statistics, analyzed and interpreted data, drafted the manuscript. X. Y. critically reviewed/edited the manuscript for important intellectual content. W.X. contributed to the data interpretation and reviewed/edited the manuscript. H. L., Z. X. and C. S. participated in the study search strategy. X. Q. originated and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted data, and critically reviewed/edited the manuscript for important intellectual content.

    ☆☆

    Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

    Funding: We state that we have not received any funding.

    View full text