Brief ReportToddlers’ bias to look at average versus obese figures relates to maternal anti-fat prejudice
Introduction
Bias against people perceived to be obese (i.e., anti-fat prejudice, weight bias) is common in most settings, including education, health, and employment (O’Brien, Hunter, & Banks, 2007). Anti-fat prejudice appears to be increasing (Latner & Stunkard, 2003) and is associated with social isolation, depression, psychiatric symptoms, low self-esteem, and poor body image (Puhl & Latner, 2007). There is a growing literature detailing the extent and consequences of anti-fat prejudice, yet little is known about the development of this prejudice (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 1999), in particular, when anti-fat prejudice arises and why.
Some research indicates that anti-fat prejudice is present during early childhood. By 5 to 10 years of age, children state that they would rather be friends with thin as opposed to overweight individuals and that thin females would be less desirable as friends if they are pictured in the vicinity of overweight females (Penny & Haddock, 2007). Even preschoolers (M = 3.67 years) assign more negative attributes to overweight than normal-weight dolls (Turnbull, Heaslip, & McLeod, 2000). Thus, anti-fat prejudice arises early in life, although it is unknown whether there are biases against overweight and obese figures in still younger children (e.g., infants/toddlers) and, if so, how they might arise.
One explanation of an anti-fat bias is that it is communicated through maternal or paternal attitudes via a process of social learning (Puhl & Heuer, 2009). To this end, there are attributions representing obesity as a moral failing (e.g., lazy, gluttonous) and stereotypes that portray people who are fat as unattractive, smelly, and unhygienic (O’Brien et al., 2013). Although there is some consistency in individuals’ prejudice toward obese individuals (e.g., in China and America; Klaczynski, 2008), there are also differences suggesting that social learning occurs. For instance, in some Pacific countries, increased weight has traditionally been associated with wealth and, therefore, has been looked on more favorably (Brewis, Wutich, Falletta-Cowden, & Rodriguez-Soto, 2011). Consistent with social learning theory, a recent meta-analysis examined a wide range of parent–child prejudices, finding that children’s attitudes closely resembled those of their parents (Degner & Dalege, 2013). More directly, two studies indicate that 4-year-olds’ attitudes toward obese individuals are related to parents’ attitudes (Holub et al., 2011, Rich et al., 2008).
Recently, Heron-Delaney, Quinn, Lee, Slater, and Pascalis (2013) showed infants pairs of pictures displaying a toned muscular body versus an overweight body, finding that 3- and 6-month-olds did not have a bias but that 9-month-olds looked longer at overweight bodies. This finding could be interpreted either as evidence of increased attention to overweight individuals due to wariness or as a preference for overweight rather than slim bodies. What is needed to provide clarity when examining research on very young children is evidence linking their looking biases to caregivers’ attitudes toward obesity. A relation between such attitudes and very young children’s looking biases would more clearly provide evidence for socialization theory.
Our research builds on previous research by first examining whether looking biases away from overweight bodies are present in four age groups: young infants (M = 7 months), older infants (M = 11 months), young toddlers (M = 29 months), and older toddlers (M = 32 months). Second, we examined whether maternal attitudes are related to children’s looking biases. Infants have relatively impoverished language ability (Dale & Fenson, 1996), social understanding (Ruffman, 2014), and experience in the world. Whether an anti-fat attitude was expressed verbally or nonverbally through gesture or facial expression, toddlers would be more likely to understand than infants. If anti-fat attitudes are socialized, a bias against viewing overweight bodies in toddlers should be related to maternal attitudes.
We also examined a range of potentially confounding variables that might influence children’s looking biases, including (a) maternal and paternal body mass index (BMI), which Heron-Delaney and colleagues (2013) hypothesized might relate to children’s viewing biases (for same-sized bodies as their parents), (b) maternal education because education is a prime indicator of socioeconomic status (SES) and higher SES is associated with less favorable attitudes toward obesity (Sobal & Stunkard, 1989), and (c) children’s television viewing, a known correlate of some of children’s attitudes such as aggression (Huesmann, Moise-Titus, Podolski, & Eron, 2003), attitudes toward food (Dixon, Scully, Wakefield, White, & Crawford, 2007), and weight bias (Latner, Rosewall, & Simmonds, 2007).
Section snippets
Participants
We tested 70 mother–child dyads comprising 18 young infants (M = 6.99 months, SD = 0.74, range = 5.80–7.90; 10 girls), 19 older infants (M = 11.11 months, SD = 2.15, range = 7.93–13.40; 11 girls), 16 young toddlers (M = 28.81 months, SD = 1.28, range = 26.03–30.14; 8 girls), and 17 older toddlers (M = 32.29 months, SD = 1.16, range = 31.06–34.16; 9 girls). Mothers were contacted on the birth of their child and volunteered for participation in this study. All mothers were the primary caregiver in the family.
Children’s looking biases
Fig. 1 includes
Results
Table 1 displays the descriptive statistics for the key variables. Preliminary analyses indicated that gender was unrelated to children’s looking times and that there were similar effects for girls and boys with regard to the relation between maternal anti-fat attitudes and looking times, and so gender was not examined further. Within each age group, we examined whether children’s looking tendency toward average versus obese figures (looking at obese figures minus looking at average figures)
Discussion
Young infants (M = 7 months) and young toddlers (M = 29 months) looked equally at average and obese figures, whereas older infants (M = 11 months) looked more at obese figures and older toddlers (M = 32 months) looked more at average figures. In addition, older toddlers’ bias to look away from obese figures and toward average figures correlated significantly with maternal anti-fat attitudes and did so independent of a range of potential confounds. To recall, previous studies had found explicit anti-fat
References (26)
- et al.
Long-term retention in 3.5-month-old infants: Familiarization time and individual differences in attentional style
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(2001) - et al.
The effects of television advertisements for junk food versus nutritious food on children’s food attitudes and preferences
Social Science and Medicine
(2007) - et al.
Nine-month-old infants prefer unattractive bodies over attractive bodies
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(2013) - et al.
Factors associated with mothers’ obesity stigma and young children’s weight stereotypes
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
(2011) There’s something about obesity: Culture, contagion, rationality, and children’s responses to drinks “created” by obese children
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(2008)- et al.
Childhood obesity stigma: Association with television, videogame, and magazine exposure
Body Image
(2007) - et al.
Beliefs and attitudes among teachers and school health care providers working with adolescents
Journal of Nutrition Education
(1999) - et al.
The relationship between physical appearance concerns, disgust, and anti-fat prejudice
Body Image
(2013) - et al.
Anti-fat prejudice among children: The “mere proximity” effect in 5–10-year-olds
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2007) To belief or not belief: Children’s theory of mind
Developmental Review
(2014)
Body normal and fat stigma in global perspective
Current Anthropology
Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Lexical development norms for young children
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
Cited by (29)
Weight bias
2023, Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health, First EditionThe ruling of weight: An institutional ethnography investigating young people's body weight surveillance work
2021, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :For example, at school, higher-weight students may be bullied by peers and treated differently by teachers, who perceive them as less intelligent (Puhl and King, 2013). Even at young ages (as early as 32 months), children have been shown to prefer thin over heavier people (Ruffman et al., 2016). Children's socialization from infancy makes this way of knowing bodies intrinsic—it is just how it is.
Stigmatizing Diagnoses in Neurosurgery: A Narrative Review
2021, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :In addition, it is often considered to be a visible manifestation of health, making overweight patients susceptible to stigma from a variety of sources. Obesity-related stigma arises in socialization before kindergarten in behavioral studies.47 Overweight intersects with a variety of other potential stigmas including economic poverty, social class, gender (females are particularly susceptible), and race.
Perceptions of early body image socialization in families: Exploring knowledge, beliefs, and strategies among mothers of preschoolers
2016, Body ImageCitation Excerpt :For example, exposure to Barbie dolls was found to increase body dissatisfaction in girls ages 5–8 (Dittmar et al., 2006). Children observe how people of various weight statuses are treated and discussed by their family (Ruffman et al., 2016), and they are exposed to family discussions about current events such as the obesity epidemic. Thus, children have on-going exposure to the meanings and values families assign to differences in weight status and body shape, but little is known about how family environments contribute to body image formation in very young children, or parents’ understanding of how families may contribute to body image formation in their child.