Selected Topics: Prehospital Care
Effect of Gender on Prehospital Refusal of Medical Aid

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.136Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

“Refusal of medical aid” (RMA) is the term commonly used by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) when someone calls 911 for care (usually the patient or a family member) but, after the initial encounter with the EMTs, the patient refuses emergency medical services transport to the hospital. Some intervention may have been performed, such as taking vital signs or an electrocardiogram, before the RMA. Although there have been multiple studies of the characteristics and outcomes of patients who RMA, little analysis has been done of the role of EMTs in these cases.

Objective

To analyze the association between EMT gender and the patient’s decision to refuse medical aid in the prehospital setting.

Methods

The study was performed using data from one hospital-based ambulance service in an urban setting that participates in the 911 system. This was a case control study that examined the data from consecutive patients who refused medical aid for a 1-year period compared to a control group of non-RMA patients.

Results

There was a significantly higher representation of all-male EMT teams in the RMA group (p < 0.0001). Using propensity score-matching methodology to control for other factors, all-male EMT teams were 4.75 times more likely to generate an RMA as compared to all-female and mixed-gender EMT teams (95% confidence interval 1.63–13.96, p = 0.0046).

Conclusion

We found that the gender of the EMTs was one of the most important factors associated with RMA, with a much higher frequency of RMAs occurring when both members of the team were male.

Introduction

Due to the potential for an adverse outcome, especially in older patients, refusal of medical aid (RMA) for emergency medical services (EMS) transport to a hospital is problematic and should be discouraged as much as possible. In one study, 2% of RMA patients (10 of 431) were subsequently hospitalized; 70% of these patients were over the age of 65 years (1). In another study specifically looking at RMA patients aged 65 years and older, 70% of patients sought follow-up medical care (70 of 100) and there was a 32% hospital admission rate. Thirty-nine percent of these admitted patients ended up in an intensive care unit (2). If we can identify factors influencing RMAs, we can better suggest interventions that may decrease them in the long term.

We sought to better understand the factors associated with a patient’s decision to RMA in the prehospital setting, particularly focusing on emergency medical technician (EMT) gender. The association between EMT gender and the patient’s decision to RMA has not, to our knowledge, been previously studied. However, there have been several studies suggesting that health care providers in other settings are perceived differently by patients based on their gender. Both male and female patients prefer female health care providers regardless of the provider’s bedside manner in studies involving obstetricians, therapists, dentists, and nurses 3, 4, 5, 6. It is possible that in the prehospital setting, patients might also prefer being treated by a female EMT, and for this reason be less likely to RMA. Our study sought to determine if there was an association between EMT gender and calls resulting in an RMA rather than a transport.

Section snippets

Study Design

This was a case control study. Cases were defined as all patients who refused medical aid within a 1-year period, August 1, 2005 through July 31, 2006. These cases were identified by doing a search of the HealthEMS database for every chart with the disposition code RMA for the given time period. The cases were then compared to a control set of all non-RMA patients evaluated by our EMS Department in a 24-h period for 10 randomly selected days within the same 1-year period. Using SAS 9.1 for

Results

The main results are summarized in Table 1. The RMA group included a total of 283 patients, 253 of whom had patient gender data recorded. In this group, 56.5% were female, with a mean age of 53 years (range 2–102 years). The control data set had a total of 325 patients, 52.6% female, with a mean age of 56 years (range 2–99 years). For patients aged 65 years and older, there were 25% in the RMA group and 46% in the control group. There was no difference in patient gender distribution or age

Discussion

Our most noteworthy finding is that the presence of two male EMTs was associated with an increase in the rate of RMAs. Our study did not find any difference in RMAs by patient age or gender. The neurologic-psychiatric-social chief complaints more commonly generated RMAs, as did a chief complaint of “none.” RMAs are not more common at the end of the shift.

It is not surprising that such large gender differences were found in our study because “the first and most vital piece of information we seek

Conclusion

We found that the gender of the EMTs is an important factor associated with patients refusing medical aid, with a much higher percentage of RMAs occurring when both members of the team were male. The presence of at least one female EMT on the team was associated with a significant decrease in the RMA rate. Chief complaints in the neurologic-psychiatric-social realm generated the most RMAs. The time within the shift, that is, the dispatch time being at the end of the tour, had no effect on RMAs.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. David Barlas, New York Hospital Queens, for his invaluable assistance with editing this manuscript.

References (25)

  • M.M. Ahmad et al.

    Patients’ preferences for nurses’ gender in Jordan

    Int J Nurs Pract

    (2007)
  • P.R. Rosenbaum et al.

    Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score

    Am Stat

    (1985)
  • Reprints are not available from the authors.

    View full text