Case Report
The forensic importance of frontal sinus radiographs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2008.05.016Get rights and content

Abstract

The identification of unidentified human remains through the comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs has found wide acceptance in recent years. Reported here is the forensic case of an unidentified adult male who had died as the result of a traffic accident, after which the body was identified by matching images of ante- and postmortem radiographs of the frontal sinus. A general discussion on identification using frontal sinus radiographs is presented, highlighting the reliability of this method, in reference to the uniqueness of the frontal sinus in humans. However, it also notes a few difficulties, especially in reference to the X-ray technique in cases where antemortem radiographs are available and a potentially larger number of anatomical, pathological or traumatic features are present. The comparison of frontal sinus outlines is recommended when it may become necessary to provide quantitative substantiation for forensic identification based on these structures.

Introduction

The use of imaging exams in legal matters has been described in forensic literature both in cases of lawsuits against healthcare professionals1 and in cases of human identification. In the latter, computerized tomography (CT) scans2 and X-rays performed with medical 3 or dental referral 4, 5, 6 can be useful tools in forensic investigations, as these examinations display different singularities of the anatomical structures analyzed.

Specifically in the skull, several types of radiographs can be taken by using particular models of panoramic or medical X-ray machines. Medical or dental referrals for skull radiography allow for the analysis of numerous anatomical structures, such as the cranium, paranasal sinuses, zygomatic process and nasal cavity. Moreover, radiographic analysis makes it possible to identify any foreign objects or intracranial calcification, evaluate symmetry or identify craniofacial bone fractures, in addition to assisting in the planning of specific treatments, such as orthodontic tracing and orthognathic or implant surgery.

The anatomical complexity of the facial skeleton has prompted the development of several types of radiographic techniques. Among those more commonly used is the posteroanterior (PA) view of the skull, also known as the Caldwell view. Its application is normally associated with the radiographic evaluation of frontal and ethmoidal sinus morphology, making it also possible to identify calvarial bone fractures.

Knowing that in addition to having clinical purposes, PA skull radiographs can also be used for legal purposes, the aim of the present study was to demonstrate, by means of a case report, the importance of frontal sinus radiographs for human identification in forensic investigations.

Section snippets

Case report

In June 2005, an unidentified adult male was killed as the result of a traffic accident. The body was taken to the local coroner’s office for a routine autopsy, in order to determine the cause and circumstances of his death, as well as the instrument that ultimately caused his demise. After 30 days, the victim remained unidentified, without matching any missing-person report. Therefore, prior to routine burial procedures, postmortem facial photographs, fingerprints and DNA material were

Discussion

Anatomically, the frontal sinuses can be defined as pneumatic cavities covered by mucosa, located between the internal and external cortical bones of the frontal bone.10 Although these cavities are not visible at birth and at the start of their development during the second year of life, they are radiologically evident structures at five or six years of age, developing during the later stages of puberty and becoming completely developed by approximately 20 years of age.11, 12 In relation to its

Final considerations

Although DNA analysis is precise and provides reliable results, this type of testing is not yet used routinely in forensic investigations performed by almost any forensic medicine departments in Brazil, including the unit where the present research was conducted. Therefore, the methods of human identification using anthropological and dental forensic parameters continue to be used, due to their relative low cost and processing time, allowing for precise and reliable results.

Within this context,

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References (28)

  • M. Angyal et al.

    Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs

    J Forensic Sci

    (1998)
  • S.L. Fischman

    The use of medical and dental radiographs in identification

    Int Dent J

    (1985)
  • R.F. Silva et al.

    The importance of dental documentation in human identification: report of a case

    Acta Odontol Venez

    (2005)
  • R.F. Silva et al.

    Dental radiographs: source of information for human identification

    Odontol Clin-Cientif

    (2006)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Pott's puffy tumor in a 23-month-old: Youngest known case of a rare disease

      2022, Auris Nasus Larynx
      Citation Excerpt :

      This case is remarkable for the presentation of a disease process that is rare in young children, but also remarkable for the presence of frontal sinuses seen radiographically and clinically in a 23-month-old child. The frontal sinus is absent at birth and typically does not begin developing until the age of 2 years [5,8,10–12]. It begins as two small air pockets above the orbits that grows through puberty until about the age of 20 years [10].

    • Three-dimensional analysis of the maxillary sinus according to sex, age, skin color, and nutritional status: A study with live Brazilian subjects using cone-beam computed tomography

      2022, Archives of Oral Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Considering the particularities of their contours, analyzing paranasal sinuses is valuable for human identification for providing information and reducing the risk of errors by forensic professionals during investigations (Barros, Serra, Kuhnen, Matos, Fernandes, 2021; Gioster-Ramos, Silva, Nascimento, Fernandes, & Serra, 2021; Musse, 2009). Several studies have evaluated maxillary sinus, frontal sinuses, and sphenoid sinuses to identify individuals (Musse, 2009; Perella, Rocha, & Cavalcanti, 2003; Tatlisumak et al., 2008; Uthman, Al-Rawi, Al-Naaimi, Tawfeeq, & Suhail, 2010), using extraoral radiographs (Pfaefflli et al., 2007; Riepert, Ulmcke, Schweden, & Nafe, 2001; Silva et al., 2009) and CT scans (Perella et al., 2003; Pfaeffli et al., 2007; Tatlisumak et al., 2008; Uthman et al., 2010). Such structures were also studied to analyze sexual dimorphism, age, and ancestry (Araújo et al., 2015; Camargo, 2000; Demiralp et al., 2019; Etemadi, Seylavi, & Yadegari, 2017; Farias Gomes et al., 2019; Garcia, 2014; Moore & Ross, 2017; Najem, Safwat, Elaziz, & Gaweesh, 2020; Özer, Atalar, Öz, Toprak, & Barut, 2018; Rani et al., 2017; Robles, Rando, & Morgan, 2020; Saccucci et al., 2015; Sidhu et al., 2014), among others.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text