Original article
Toric lens implantation in cataract surgery: Automated versus manual horizontal axis marking, analysis of 50 cases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2017.11.002Get rights and content

Summary

Subject

The main objective of our study was to evaluate the contribution of automated conjunctival registration in the alignment of toric intraocular lenses by comparing automated registration optimized with Callisto® to manual marking of the horizontal axis.

Materials and methods

We performed a prospective, descriptive, monocentric study on patients undergoing cataract surgery with a toric intraocular lens (Asphina 709 Zeiss), performed by a surgeon with good experience in toric implants, between September 2016 and March 2017. We analyzed the agreement between the manual marking of the 0–180° axis versus the one automatically generated by the Callisto™, as well as the alignment of the IOL and the refractive results at 1 month.

Results

We included 50 eyes of 38 patients. The mean corrected astigmatism was 1,9 D. The mean difference between the 2 axes was 4,7° [0–12.3°]. Only 50 % of the preoperative manual markings were consistent with the automated measurement (< 5°). At one month, the mean rotation recorded was 4,3° [0–29°]. The alignment was identical for 70 % (n = 35) of the IOLs (≤ 5°). As for residual subjective astigmatism, the mean was 0.58 D. The mean visual acuity without correction was 8/10 and 55 % saw 10/10 without correction.

Discussion

Refractive performance depends on preoperative measurement, correct alignment of the IOL and its stability in the bag. Our study shows the value of automated conjunctival registration in the determination of the intraoperative axis of alignment, even with an experienced surgeon. This precision is essential for a good refractive result, especially since residual astigmatism in the case of misalignment will increase with the power of the implant.

Conclusion

Our study shows excellent refractive results, regardless of the initial astigmatism, using automated alignment. Precision of toric implantation opens the way to toric multifocal implantation under the best conditions.

Introduction

Cataract surgery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in France [1].

In the case of corneal astigmatism over 1 diopter (D), good distance vision requires glasses, despite correction of the spherical component of the refraction by an intraocular lens (IOL).

Correction of this astigmatism is possible at the time of the procedure and several options have already been available since the commercialization of toric platforms using virtual reality technology for alignment of the IOLs under the operating microscope.

We were interested in these technologies, which allow automated detection of the target axis of astigmatism, and studied their contribution in real life.

The primary goal of our study was to evaluate the role of conjunctival registration in the alignment of toric IOLs by a surgeon experienced in toric IOLs, comparing the axis generated automatically by conjunctival registration by Callisto® (Zeiss) to the manual axis based on an initial marking of the 0–180° axis by marking pen in a seated position as the reference axis for the Callisto®.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This was a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, descriptive study from September 2016 to March 2017.

The patients included had to be eligible for cataract surgery, with corneal astigmatism equal to at least 0.75 diopter (D) against the rule or oblique, or greater than or equal to 1 D with the rule.

Exclusion criteria involved ophthalmologic comorbidities, which might limit total visual rehabilitation, such as congenital or acquired amblyopia, macular disease (age-related macular

Population

We included 50 eyes of 38 patients over the defined period. The sex ration was 1.7 women/men (38/24). Among the 50 eyes, there were 27 right eyes and 23 left eyes.

The mean age was 75.6 ± 6.8 years [54–90 years].

Characteristics of the IOLs used

The mean astigmatism corrected by the IOL was 1.9 D ([1 to 5 D], median 1.5 D). The majority (58 %) of IOLs had a cylindrical power of 1 or 1.5 D, and 14 % (n = 7) had a cylindrical power of 3 D or greater (Fig. 3).

Comparison of the 2 axes of alignment, automated and manual

We observed no failure of the conjunctival registration; thus, the automated

Discussion

Wilkins et al. have reported that full-time glasses wear was 34 times more frequent per diopter of astigmatism in the better eye [2], and it is estimated that approximately 30 % of patients undergoing cataract surgery have regular corneal astigmatism  1 D [3], [4], [5].

The prevalence of preoperative astigmatism in the literature is variable: approximately one third of eyes have astigmatism greater than 1 D according to Hoffmann and Hütz [4], while this figure is as high as 47 % in a Chinese

Conclusion

The use of the automated reference axis of the Callisto combined with the IOL Master 700, the basis of the Cataract Work place™ (Zeiss), has demonstrated excellent refractive results in our series.

This study shows the reproducibility of conjunctival registration and the impact on final IOL alignment in half of the patients for at least 5°. A difference of 5 to 10° may impact the refractive outcome, even more greatly the higher the cylindrical power of the IOL used.

A face-to-face comparative

Disclosure of interest

Corinne Dot is a consultant at Alcon, Hoya and Zeiss. The other authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References (40)

Cited by (15)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Oral presentation presented at the 123rd Congress of the French Society of Ophthalmology in May 2017.

View full text