Review
Clinical prediction models for ESBL-Enterobacteriaceae colonization or infection: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.01.012Get rights and content

Summary

Background

β-Lactamase resistance among certain Gram-negative bacteria has been associated with increased mortality, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs.

Aim

To identify and critically appraise existing clinical prediction models of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-EKP) infection or colonization.

Methods

Electronic databases, reference lists, and citations were searched from inception to April 2018. Papers were included in any language describing the development or validation, or both, of models and scores to predict the risk of ESBL-EKP infection or colonization.

Findings

In all, 1795 references were screened, of which four articles were included in the review. The included studies were carried out in different geographical locations with differing study designs, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most if not all studies lacked external validation and blinding of reviewers during the evaluation of the predictor variables and outcome. All studies excluded missing data and most studies did not report the number of patients excluded due to missing data. Fifteen predictors of infection or colonization with ESBL-EKP were identified. Commonly included predictors were previous antibiotic use, previous hospitalization, transfer from another healthcare facility, and previous procedures (urinary catheterization and invasive procedures).

Conclusion

Due to limitations and variations in the study design, clinicians would have to take these differences into consideration when deciding on how to use these models in clinical practice. Due to lack of external validation, the generalizability of these models remains a question. Therefore, further external validation in local settings is needed to confirm the usefulness of these models in supporting decision-making.

Introduction

Several studies have suggested that infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (i.e. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus mirabilis) (ESBL-EKP) have an important clinical impact, and the increasing prevalence of these organisms in hospitals has been well documented [1], [2], [3]. β-Lactamase resistance among certain Gram-negative bacteria has been associated with increased mortality, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs. A study by Schwaber et al. concluded that infection with an ESBL-producing organism was associated with an adjusted 3.6-fold increased risk of in-hospital mortality, an unadjusted 2.3-fold increased risk of infection-related mortality, an adjusted 1.6-fold increase in length of stay, an adjusted 25-fold increased risk of delay in appropriate therapy, and an unadjusted 4-fold-increased likelihood of discharge to a long-term care facility for those who survived [4]. In view of these potential complications, it is important to implement measures to combat resistance, develop treatment strategies to overcome the adverse consequences of resistance, and to identify patients at risk of resistance early and accurately, so that effective antibiotic therapy can be given.

Precise determination of risk factors for ESBL-EKP infection may assist in accurate targeting of empirical carbapenem therapy; with appropriate therapy, there should be a decline in treatment failure, infectious complications, antibiotic costs, and the risk of selecting carbapenem resistance [5], [6]. A risk discrimination tool that can identify patients likely to harbour ESBL-EKP might therefore assist with rational antibiotic prescribing and the early implementation of infection control precautions [7].

Several clinical scoring tools have been published since 2011 [7], [8], [9], [10]. Attempts to develop or validate these scoring tools have been made by different study groups in different populations and their findings have been heterogeneous. To our knowledge, no previous systematic review of clinical risk scoring systems for predicting ESBL-EKP colonization or infection in hospitalized patients has been published. Therefore, we aimed to carry out a systematic review, to describe and give an overview of these scoring systems, and to compare and contrast the scores to assist clinicians in their use in clinical practice.

Section snippets

Methods

The Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) Checklist was followed to guide the framing of the review aim, search strategy, and study inclusion and exclusion criteria [11]. The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO [12]. Reporting of the review was consistent with PRISMA guidelines [13].

Study selection

Our search identified 1795 articles after removal of duplicates. Only four articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review (Figure 1) [7], [8], [9], [10]. The earliest study was published in 2011 and the most recent was published in 2017.

Study design and participants

Two types of study design were used: retrospective matched case–control studies [8], [9] and cohort studies [7], [10]. Only one study performed an external prospective validation of the prediction model derived from their

Discussion

In the last two decades, extensive use of broad-spectrum β-lactams has led to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, including ESBL-EKP [1], [15], [16]. β-Lactams are most commonly used for the treatment of bacterial infections. The persistent exposure of bacterial strains to a multitude of β-lactams has induced dynamic and continuous production, and mutation of the β-lactamase enzymes in these bacteria, expanding their activity to newly developed β-lactam

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding sources

None.

References (25)

  • S.W. Johnson et al.

    Utility of a clinical risk factor scoring model in predicting infection with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae on hospital admission

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2013)
  • M. Tumbarello et al.

    Identifying patients harboring extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae on hospital admission: derivation and validation of a scoring system

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2011)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Extended spectrum cephalosporin resistant enterobacteriaceae carriage and infection in patients admitted with newly-diagnosed acute leukemia

      2023, American Journal of Infection Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Risk factors for acquired carriage in our patient population have not been adequately determined. Prior studies of other populations have identified a number of predictors including older age, male sex, and previous recent contact with the health care system, mainly hospitalization and antibiotic exposure.8,9 Arnan et al.10 studied a diverse population of patients with hematologic malignancies and HSCT recipients; combining both those with carriage on admission and acquired colonization, they identified only recent prior antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for ESCRE E. coli carriage.

    • Machine learning in predicting antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other performance metrics (F1-score, PPV, NPV, Precision, Recall) for ML prediction are also provided in Figure 4. The contingency table was extracted from 11 ML prediction studies [19,23,27,28,33-35,38,40,41,43] and 30 scoring system studies (supplementary material references [1-5,7,8,11-13,15,16,18,19,21,22,25-29,31-39]). The pooled estimated AUC was 0.82 (0.78–0.85) for ML prediction and 0.65 (0.23–0.92) for the scoring system.

    • Restricted antimicrobial prescribing in an area of highly prevalent antimicrobial resistance

      2021, Infectious Diseases Now
      Citation Excerpt :

      One ASP intervention would be to defer initiation of rABX in non-responding but stable patients. This could be implemented in association with modalities such as decision support with predictive models for MDRO infections and rapid diagnostic tools [22–25]. Recent hospitalization was the most frequent stated reason for rABX prescription (72.7%).

    • Third-Generation Cephalosporin Resistance and Associated Discordant Antibiotic Treatment in Emergency Department Febrile Urinary Tract Infections

      2021, Annals of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Yet, unfortunately, these risk factors were also present in 86% of control patients. This is consistent with published clinical prediction models for ESBL infection or colonization, most of which achieve sensitivities of 80% to 94%, but much lower specificities of 54% to 74%.19,27 It seems likely that any attempt to cover most ESBL-EKP UTIs with appropriate empiric therapy, such as a carbapenem, would require a tremendous amount of “overshooting,” exposing many patients unnecessarily to very broad-spectrum empiric therapy.

    • Relative faecal abundance of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and its impact on infections among intensive care unit patients: a pilot study

      2021, Journal of Hospital Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      This could incorporate information known to be associated with the risk of ESBL-PE infection in carriers such as the source of infection (urinary, intra-abdominal), relative faecal abundance of ESBL-PE, and severity of the infection. Recent studies have attempted to build a predictive score for the risk of ESBL-PE infection in carrier patients [9,10]. These scores most often include age, prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection (urinary and intra-abdominal).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text