Current concept

Pediatric Distal Radius and Forearm Fractures

Las fracturas diafisarias de antebrazo (FDA) en pacientes esqueléticamente inmaduros son lesiones comunes que representan el 30% de las fracturas de la extremidad superior en este grupo etario. Existen casos con lesiones inestables o reducciones inaceptables, en los cuales está indicada la resolución quirúrgica mediante la reducción y estabilización con clavos endomedulares elásticos (CEE) por vía percutánea. Una de las ventajas que ofrece este sistema es evitar un abordaje del foco de fractura, pudiendo realizar la reducción de forma cerrada en la gran mayoría de estas. Sin embargo, no siempre es posible lograr una aceptable reducción cerrada y entonces es necesaria la apertura del foco de fractura. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si existen factores preoperatorios para predecir la dificultad de efectuar una reducción cerrada en estos pacientes.

Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes esqueléticamente inmaduros con FDA agudas, tratados con CEE por el mismo cirujano pediátrico. La variable de resultado primaria se definió como la necesidad de llevar a cabo una reducción abierta; considerado como un abordaje quirúrgico directo en el sitio de fractura. Se analizaron las características demográficas de los pacientes incluidos y las radiográficas de la fractura.

Encontramos que la mediana del porcentaje del acortamiento del radio preoperatorio en los grupos de reducción cerrada y reducción abierta fue del 1 y 5%, respectivamente; resultando en una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0,04).

El acortamiento del radio en las radiografías preoperatorias permite predecir un aumento del riesgo de requerir una reducción abierta de la fractura (39% de asociación); por lo cual, esta variable debe ser considerada por el traumatólogo general como un factor pronóstico para definir la derivación de estos pacientes.

Diaphyseal forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients are common injuries that account for 30% of upper extremity fractures in this age group. There are cases with unstable injuries or unacceptable reductions, in which surgical resolution by reduction and stabilisation with percutaneous elastic endomedullary nailing is indicated. One of the advantages of this system is that it avoids an approach to the fracture site, allowing closed reduction in the vast majority of fractures. However, it is not always possible to achieve an acceptable closed reduction and opening of the fracture site is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are preoperative factors to predict the difficulty of performing closed reduction in these patients.

A retrospective study of skeletally immature patients with acute diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with elastic endomedullary nailing by the same paediatric surgeon was performed. The primary outcome variable was defined as the need for open reduction; considered as a direct surgical approach to the fracture site. Demographic characteristics of the included patients and radiographic characteristics of the fracture were analysed.

We found that the median percentage of preoperative radial shortening in the closed reduction and open reduction groups was 1 and 5%, respectively; resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04).

Radial shortening on preoperative radiographs predicts an increased risk of requiring an open reduction of the fracture (39% association); thus we understand that this variable should be considered by the general traumatologist as a prognostic factor in defining the referral of these patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a simulation curriculum on performance of closed reduction (CR) and casting of distal radius and distal both-bone forearm fractures by orthopaedic surgery residents. The secondary aim was to identify if repeated simulation training during the clinical rotation provided additional benefit.

Orthopaedic surgery residents performed simulated distal radius fracture (DRF) reduction and cast application near the beginning and end of their 6-month pediatric orthopaedic clinical rotation at a tertiary care children's hospital. A subgroup of trainees were randomly assigned additional simulation training halfway through their rotation. Clinically, 28 residents treated 159 distal radius and/or distal both-bone forearm fractures with CR and casting during the study period. Radiographic evaluations were performed comparing postreduction fracture angulation, displacement, cast index, and loss of reduction (LOR) rates at the beginning of a resident's rotation (presimulation cases) and at the end of the resident's rotation (postsimulation cases). Comparisons were also made between residents who had and did not have additional simulation training exposure during their rotation.

Overall, postreduction radius angulation, maximal angulation, and cast index were lower in the postsimulation group than in the presimulation group with means 1.8^°, 2.6^°, and 0.75 vs 4.0^°, 4.4^° and 0.77, respectively. LOR rate was also lower (14% vs 30%). No significant differences were demonstrated for postreduction ulna angulation as well as for radius, ulna, or maximal displacement between these 2 groups. No significant differences were observed in radiographic parameters, cast indices, or LOR rates between residents who underwent additional mid-rotation training vs those who did not.

The incorporation of a simulation training curriculum for CR and casting of pediatric distal forearm fractures resulted in statistically significant, however, marginally improved postreduction radiographic parameters and LOR rates among orthopaedic residents. The utility of repeated additional simulation training during the course of a clinical rotation remains unclear in the short term.

The purpose of this study is to assess the use of esketamine as procedural sedation for the reduction of paediatric forearm fractures in the emergency department (ED). A retrospective analysis was undertaken of forearm fractures between 1^st January 2012 to 31^st December 2016 which were treated with manipulation in ED using esketamine sedation. Patient demographics and fracture configuration were collected. Patient radiographs were evaluated and cast index calculated. 151 patients (103 male, 48 female) were included (average age of 8.5 [1 to 15]). Four (2.6%) patients were lost to final follow up. 11 (7%) fractures were not accepted after initial manipulation and required formal surgical management under general anaesthetic. At one week follow up, a further 5 (3%) fractures displaced requiring operative management. 100% of patients who slipped at one week had a cast index greater than 0.8 [average 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.92]. At final follow up successful reduction was achieved in 89.1% (131/144) of patients. No adverse events occurred following administration of esketamine. This study provides evidence that manipulation of paediatric forearm fractures using esketamine as procedural sedation in the ED is comparable to other methods in achieving acceptable outcomes. This is in addition to the potential for cost savings. However, future studies formally assessing cost effectiveness and patient outcomes are needed.