Letter to the EditorBronchoalveolar lavage lateral-flow device test for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis diagnosis in haematological malignancy and solid organ transplant patients
Section snippets
Transparency declaration
LFD tests used in this study were provided by Dr C. Thornton, University of Exeter. No other funding was obtained for this study.
Potential conflicts of interest
M. Hoenigl received research grant from Merck; speakers fee from Astellas and Merck.
All other authors no conflict.
Acknowledgement
We acknowledge the help of Brigitta Waitzl in sample organization and preparation.
References (10)
- et al.
Aspergillus galactomannan antigen assay in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
J Infect
(2010 Dec) - et al.
Impact of galactomannan testing on the prevalence of invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematological malignancies
Med Mycol
(2012 Apr) - et al.
Detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in haematological malignancy patients by using lateral-flow technology
J Vis Exp
(2012 Mar 22) Development of an immunochromatographic lateral-flow device for rapid serodiagnosis of invasive aspergillosis
Clin Vaccine Immunol
(2008 Jul)- et al.
Comparison of lateral flow technology and galactomannan and (1->3)-beta-D-glucan assays for detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
Clin Vaccine Immunol
(2009 Dec)
Cited by (65)
The performance of galactomannan in combination with 1,3-β-D-glucan or aspergillus-lateral flow device for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: Evidences from 13 studies
2019, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious DiseaseCitation Excerpt :The Fagan nomogram (Fagan, 1975) was used to assess the clinical utility of the combined performance of GM and BDG assays, which demonstrated that the possibility of having IA was heightened 3.6-fold when the two tests had at least one positive result, and declined to 2% with both negative results (Fig. 5). Seven studies provided combined diagnostic data of GM and LFD test for proven/probable IA versus possible or no IA, of which five studies (Hoenigl et al., 2012, 2014; Miceli et al., 2015; Prattes et al., 2014, 2015) evaluated the two assays with BAL samples and two studies(Held et al., 2013; White et al., 2013) with serum samples. When at least one positivity of GM or LFD (GM/LFD) was defined for the true positive result, the pooled SEN, SPE, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.93, 0.82, 5.11, 0.08, 62.77 and 0.91, respectively, with substantial heterogeneity (Q-test = 7.69, P = 0.011, I2 = 73.98%) (Figs. 6 and 7).
Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline
2018, Clinical Microbiology and InfectionPoint-of-care testing for viral-associated pulmonary aspergillosis
2024, Expert Review of Molecular DiagnosticsRapid Point-of-Care Identification of Aspergillus Species in Microbial Keratitis
2023, JAMA Ophthalmology