Elsevier

Journal of Infection

Volume 78, Issue 2, February 2019, Pages 158-169
Journal of Infection

Letter to the Editor
A cluster of cases of pneumocystis pneumonia identified by shotgun metagenomics approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Metagenomics sequencing performed well in diagnosing PCP compared to conventional methods.

  • Metagenomics exhibited the ability to detect co-infections in PCP patients.

  • Blood samples metagenomics might suit patients who couldn't tolerate invasive procedures.

  • Pathogen reads ranking and proportion rate may be the promising cutoff value.

Section snippets

Declaration

We confirm that each individual named as an author meets the journal's criteria for authorship and neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal.

Funding

This study was supported by the New and Advanced Technology Project of Shanghai Municipal Hospital: Application of next generation sequencing technique in precise diagnosis of infectious diseases (SHDC12017104).

A Conflict of Interest

All authors report no potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients for cooperating with our investigation and acknowledge the professionalism and compassion demonstrated by all the healthcare workers involved in patients’ care.

Cited by (58)

  • Multilaboratory assessment of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for unbiased microbe detection

    2022, Journal of Advanced Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    From sample processing to result reporting, testing based on a second-generation sequencing platform (such as illumina sequencing) can be completed within 24–48 h, while a third-generation sequencing platform (such as Nanopore sequencing) takes only 6 h [10]. Respiratory tract infection-based cohort studies have shown that the detection rate of mNGS (>60%) for respiratory tract samples is significantly higher than that of traditional detection methods (30%–50%) [11–13]. In particular, mNGS shows excellent detection performance in identifying unexpected, atypical and slow-growing pathogens within a clinically actionable time frame [9].

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Yi Zhang and Jing-Wen Ai contributed equally to this manuscript.

View full text