Elsevier

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volume 17, Issue 6, November–December 2010, Pages 703-708
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Review Article
Hysteroscopy without Anesthesia: Review of Recent Literature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The need for anesthesia or analgesia for performing hysteroscopy is still matter of debate. Many factors explain the lack of agreement about anesthesia in hysteroscopy depending on the instrumentation, technique employed, need of performing surgical procedure, operator skill and patients' characteristics. Diagnostic minihysteroscopy (3.5 mm or less in size) is less painful and easier to perform than hysteroscopy performed with instruments sized around 5 mm. Thanks to miniaturized instruments, office hysteroscopy allows a growing number of women to be treated in an office setting avoiding the operating room. The main limitation to its widespread use is pain and low patient tolerance. Intrauterine surgical procedures involving only the endometrial mucosa (biopsies, adhesiolisis, cervical and endometrial polyectomies) are not painful. For endometrial polypectomy size of polyps (<2.2m) and duration of the procedure (more than 15 min) are limiting factors. Most literature suggests that office hysteroscopy in experienced hands is a well-tolerated technique and requires the use of analgesics only in selected patients like women with previous caesarean section, history of chronic pelvic pain, anxiety and in menopause.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

A search of the PubMed database from 199 to the present was performed using the keywords “Anesthesia, “Hysteroscopy”, and “Pain.” Seventy-nine articles about both diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy were retrieved.

First, the causes of pain in simple exploration (diagnostic hysteroscopy) were examined; however, it must be remembered that the same factors influence pain perception and need for anesthesia in operative procedures.

Operative Hysteroscopy

Operative hysteroscopes sized 5 mm or smaller equipped with a 5F operative canal have enabled many surgical procedures to be performed in an office setting, with local or no anesthesia 32, 33, 34. The realization of 5F forceps, and especially of a bipolar coaxial electrode (Gynecare VersaPoint; Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ), has enabled the therapeutic possibility of office hysteroscopy, and currently many intrauterine diseases may be treated immediately after diagnosis, that is, using the

Conclusions

In a growing number of women, hysteroscopic procedures can be successfully performed in an office setting without any anesthesia. Diagnostic minihysteroscopy using 3.5-mm instruments is less painful and easier to perform than hysteroscopy performed using 5-cm instruments. However, severe pain and adverse effects may occur rarely even with mini-instruments. Women with a history of cesarean section, chronic pelvic pain, or anxiety, or are menopausal should be considered at risk of pain

References (44)

  • J.W. Ross

    Numerous indications for office flexible minihysteroscopy

    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc

    (2000)
  • Yu-Hung Lin et al.

    Use of sublingual buprenorphine for pain relief in office hysteroscopy

    J Minim Invasive Gynecol

    (2005)
  • F. Marsh et al.

    The technique and overview of flexible hysteroscopy

    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am

    (2004)
  • C.C. Chang

    Efficacy of office diagnostic hysterofibroscopy

    J Minim Invasive Gynecol

    (2007)
  • F. Nagele et al.

    2500 Outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1996)
  • E. Cicinelli et al.

    Predictive factors for pain experienced at office fluid minihysteroscopy

    J Minin Invasive Gynecol

    (2007)
  • A. Agostini et al.

    Good practice and accuracy of office hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy

    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)

    (2008)
  • G. Garuti et al.

    Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in 237 patients: feasibility of a one-stop “see-and-treat” procedure

    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc

    (2004)
  • S. Bettocchi et al.

    Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments

    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc

    (2004)
  • M.R. Porreca et al.

    Hysteroscopic polypectomy in the office without anesthesia

    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc

    (1996)
  • G. Garuti et al.

    Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in postmenopausal women: a comparison between mechanical and electrosurgical resection

    J Minim Invasive Gynecol

    (2008)
  • P. Litta et al.

    Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia: advantages and limits

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (84)

    • Guideline No. 447: Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Polyps

      2024, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
    • Office Hysteroscopy: Setting up Your Practice for Success

      2022, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      One randomized control trial showed lower pain levels with a 3.5 mm hysteroscope compared with either a 5 mm hysteroscope or a 5 mm hysteroscope with paracervical block.24 Factors associated with higher levels of perceived pain include cervical stenosis, postmenopausal status, anxiety, and chronic pelvic pain.24 Premedication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or opioids, such as tramadol or oxycodone, can also reduce discomfort.

    • Pain management for in-office hysteroscopy. A practical decalogue for the operator

      2021, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The author has no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

    View full text