Elsevier

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volume 19, Issue 5, September–October 2012, Pages 620-626
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Original Article
Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Adenomyosis and Myomas of the Uterus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Study Objective

To estimate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection of myomas and adenomyosis of the uterus.

Design

Prospective cohort observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting

Department of obstetrics and gynecology, tertiary academic hospital.

Patients

One hundred fifty-three consecutive women with an enlarged uterus accompanied by gynecologic symptoms and/or with an asymptomatic pelvic mass.

Intervention

Total abdominal hysterectomy. All patients underwent MRI before the operation.

Measurements and Main Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of MRI for the diagnosis of uterine pathology was calculated using histologic findings as the standard criterion for final diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristics curves were constructed to describe the diagnostic performance of MRI. In the diagnosis of myomas, MRI demonstrated sensitivity of 94.1%, specificity of 68.7%, PPV of 95.7%, and NPV of 61.1%. In the diagnosis of adenomyosis, MRI demonstrated sensitivity of 46.1%, specificity of 99.1%, PPV of 92.3%, and NPV of 88.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the diagnostic performance of MRI in the detection of myomas and adenomyosis was 0.81 and 0.73, respectively. Uterine sarcoma was diagnosed in 5 patients; in these cases, MRI demonstrated sensitivity of 60.0%, specificity of 99.2%, PPV of 75.0%, and NPV of 98.4%. The AUC for MRI in the diagnosis of uterine sarcomas was 0.80.

Conclusions

MRI exhibits a high AUC for the diagnosis of both adenomyosis and myomas. The PPV of MRI in the diagnosis of adenomyosis and myomas of the uterus is high as well. MRI seems to be a useful technique in everyday clinical practice in the diagnostic approach of these common conditions, enabling clinicians to select the most appropriate management.

Section snippets

Study Design and Power Analysis

This prospective cohort study was designed and executed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary academic hospital. Ethics committee approval was obtained. The ROC curve is a graph that plots the sensitivity of a diagnostic test as a function of its corresponding specificity (1-specificity or false-positive rate). In tests that are both sensitive and specific, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) approaches 1.0, whereas in tests neither sensitive nor specific, the AUC lies

Results

Of 153 women with gynecologic symptoms and/or an enlarged uterus, 135 fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study. The mean (SD; 95% CI) age of the study population was 46.7 (11.20; 44.83–48.65) years. Parity was 1.6 (1.04; 1.44–1.81) children (2 [0–5]). The referring symptom was heavy menstrual bleeding in 78 patients, postmenopausal bleeding in 12, abdominal heaviness, bloating, and suprapubic pain in 24, and pelvic mass in 9. In 5 patients, enlarged

Discussion

The results of the present study highlight the value of MRI in the diagnosis of myomas and adenomyosis of the uterus. The most important finding is that after the construction of ROC curves, the AUC is high, 0.81 for the diagnosis of myomas and 0.73 for adenomyosis. Moreover, it seems that MRI is a diagnostic method characterised primarily by a high PPV in the diagnosis of myomas (95.7%) and adenomyosis (92.3%).

The significance of our results is apparent in everyday clinical practice. Myomas

References (38)

  • H. Peric et al.

    The symptomatology of adenomyosis

    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol

    (2006)
  • H. Divakar

    Asymptomatic uterine fibroids

    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol

    (2008)
  • W.H. Parker

    Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas

    Fertil Steril

    (2007)
  • G.F. Grimbizis et al.

    A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of endometrial pathology

    Fertil Steril

    (2010)
  • H. Peric et al.

    The symptomatology of adenomyosis

    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol

    (2006)
  • P. Vercellini et al.

    Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors

    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol

    (2006)
  • J. Rabinovici et al.

    New interventional techniques for adenomyosis

    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol

    (2006)
  • R.E. Blake

    Leiomyomata uteri: hormonal and molecular determinants of growth

    J Natl Med Assoc

    (2007)
  • S.K. Laughlin et al.

    New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids

    Semin Reprod Med

    (2010)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Hysteroscopic myomectomy: The guidelines of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE)

      2022, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    • Benign Uterine Disease: The Added Role of Imaging

      2021, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
    • A Systematic Review of Adenomyosis: It Is Time to Reassess What We Thought We Knew about the Disease

      2021, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, either ectopic endometrium present ≥2 mm deep in the myometrium or ectopic endometrium visible ≥1 microscopic field at 10-fold magnification from the endomyometrial junction merit an adenomyosis diagnosis. Adenomyosis foci are often circumferentially surrounded by bundles of hypertrophic smooth muscle cells or stromal fibroblasts [14]. Although only a few articles define the surrounding changes of hypertrophy and reactive fibrosis as adenomyosis, these changes may be as important in the pathogenesis of the disease as the actual presence of ectopic endometrial glands [15–17].

    • Focal adenomyosis is associated with primary infertility

      2020, Fertility and Sterility
      Citation Excerpt :

      The diagnosis of adenomyosis was based on strict and previously published MRI criteria, which is a widely accepted technique for diagnosing adenomyosis (2, 3, 8). Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful technique for diagnosing adenomyosis as it allows clinicians to diagnose the disease in women who are relatively young, compared with diagnoses based on histology of the uterus, which require a hysterectomy (30). During the preoperative imaging workup, the radiologists were informed that a gynecological disease was suspected, but they were blinded to the results of the clinical findings and the previous imaging examinations.

    • Imaging Spectrum of Benign Uterine Disease and Treatment Options

      2020, Radiologic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      MR imaging is highly accurate for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. In a prospective cohort, Stamatopoulos and colleagues64 described a sensitivity of 46.1%, specificity of 99.2%, and positive predictive value of 92.3% of MR imaging in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. An MR imaging classification of adenomyosis was recently proposed by Bazot and Darai,65 including definitions of different forms of adenomyosis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

    View full text