Elsevier

Journal of Endodontics

Volume 37, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 1677-1681
Journal of Endodontics

Basic Research
Apical Extrusion of Sodium Hypochlorite Using Different Root Canal Irrigation Systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Root canal irrigation carries a risk of extrusion of irrigant into the periapical tissues. The objective of this study was to compare different irrigation systems in matched pairs of teeth prepared to an apical size of 35.06 and 50.06 by measuring the frequency and extent of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) into a simulated periapical environment. The null hypothesis was tested that there is no difference between systems.

Methods

Bilaterally matched pairs (n = 10) of single-canal extracted human anterior teeth were instrumented to an apical size of either 35.06 or 50.06. Teeth were embedded in a gel containing the pH-sensitive dye M-cresol purple that changes from yellow at pH 7.4 to purple at pH 9. Root canals were irrigated with 6% NaOCl (pH 11) by using EndoActivator (EA), EndoVac (EV), Rispi-Sonic/MicroMega 1500 (MM), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and syringe irrigation with a slot-tipped needle (SN), so that each tooth underwent all irrigation procedures in a randomized crossover design. Apical extrusion was evaluated by image analyses.

Results

The frequency of extrusion was less in teeth with apical preparation size 35.06 (36%) compared with 50.06 (60%) (P = .014) and was dependent on the irrigation system in 35.06 (P = .039) but not 50.06 groups. In the 35.06 group the frequency of extrusion was less for EV than for MM and SN (both P = .029). The extent of extrusion was less for MM compared with PUI (P = .024) and SN (P = .046) in the 35.06 group and greater for SN compared with all other systems in the 50.06 group (P < .05). The null hypothesis was rejected.

Conclusions

The frequency of apical extrusion of NaOCl was dependent on the type of root canal irrigation system and apical preparation size. The extent of extrusion depended on the irrigation system, with syringe and slotted-needle irrigation resulting in the greatest extent of extrusion.

Section snippets

Tooth Selection and Preparation

Ten pairs of single-canal bilaterally matched extracted human anterior teeth were used. Details on selection criteria and working length (WL) have been previously described (7). One tooth from each pair was instrumented to an apical size of ISO 35.06 and the other to 50.06 by using a crown-down technique and rotary files (Vortex; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Johnson City, TN). Apical patency was maintained by passing a #15 file to WL after each rotary instrument. All teeth were irrigated with 1 mL 6%

Results

All positive and negative controls performed as expected.

Discussion

The results of this in vitro study demonstrate that both apical preparation size and the method of activation and delivery of NaOCl into the apical one-third play a role in the amount of extrusion into the apical tissues. The null hypothesis was rejected. The lowest frequency of extrusion occurred with the EV system at an apical preparation size of 35.06. Although an advantage of needle irrigation is that it provides easy control of needle depth in the canal as well as the volume of irrigant

Acknowledgments

The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.

References (31)

Cited by (91)

  • Comparative effects of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming, and the conventional needle irrigation on apical extrusion of irrigants

    2022, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    A #10 file was used to ensure root canal patency [4]. The teeth were mounted in acrylic resin blocks, and plastic capillary tubes (Pluss, Italy) were used to apply water pressure equal to periodontal pressure (7.99 cmH2O) to the apex [3,6] (Fig. 1). A total of 4 mL of irrigant was used in each group.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by OHSU Graduate Endodontic Research Funds and a Resident Research grant from the American Association of Endodontists Foundation.

View full text