Craniomaxillofacial trauma

“Mirroring” Computational Planning, Navigation Guidance System, and Intraoperative Mobile C-Arm Cone-Beam Computed Tomography With Flat-Panel Detector: A New Rationale in Primary and Secondary Treatment of Midfacial Fractures?

Our study aimed to evaluate modified patient-specific surgical-guide-assisted precise treatment of unilateral comminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.

The retrospective non-randomized study was conducted in a single hospital in China. All patients diagnosed with unilateral comminuted ZMC fractures between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent preoperative spiral computed tomography (CT). CT data were processed using software to DICOM format and transferred to Proplan CMF3.0 for preoperative virtual surgical planning and postoperative evaluation. All data were extracted from standardized electronic medical records. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0. The chi-square test and t-test were used for statistical analyses.

The 54 included patients were divided into two comparable, equal cohorts of 27 patients, and followed up for at least 6 months. Fracture reduction was assisted using the modified patient-specific surgical guides in the guide group (23 males, four females; mean age 37.74 ± 12.07 years) and without the modified patient-specific surgical guides in the control group (20 males, seven females; mean age 37.44 ± 13.58 years).

In the guide group, the mean eminence deviation between the affected and unaffected sides was 1.01 ± 0.92 mm, and the mean width deviation between the affected and unaffected sides was 1.29 ± 1.32 mm. In the control group, the mean eminence deviation between the affected and unaffected sides was 1.99 ± 1.69 mm, and the mean width deviation between the affected and unaffected sides was 2.68 ± 2.01 mm. The differences in facial protrusion (p = 0.001) and width (p = 0.003) symmetry between the affected and healthy sides of the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

In conclusion, applying the modified patient-specific surgical guides to unilateral comminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture reduction has the advantages of greater predictability and effectiveness, and improved bilateral ZMC symmetry. It should be noted that this approach would be especially beneficial for less-experienced surgeons.

To gain a comprehensive understanding of the utilization of intraoperative 3D imaging among maxillofacial surgeons practicing in France through a web-based questionnaire.

An 18-point multiple-choice questionnaire was developed and distributed to participants. The questionnaire was divided into two sections, with the first section gathering general information about the respondents and the second section providing an overview of the utilization of 3D imaging techniques, such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including the conditions, frequencies, and indications for use, with a particular focus on the number of acquisitions per procedure and the other departments with whom the equipment is shared.

A total of 75 participants completed the survey, with 30% of university hospital departments and 0% of private clinics currently utilizing intraoperative 3D imaging systems. The main indications for 50% of the users were for temporomandibular joint surgery and orbital fractures.

The results of this survey indicate that the utilization of intraoperative 3D imaging in French maxillofacial surgery is limited to university centers, with poor utilization and a lack of standardization in indications for use.

This systematic review aims to investigate the effect of virtual planning on the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) traumatology followed by intraoperative navigation. Furthermore, clinical outcomes following intraoperative navigation surgery or conventional surgery will be compared.

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web-of-Science, and Cochrane on January 1st, 2022. Inclusion criteria were articles using preoperative three-dimensional (3D) virtual planning combined with intraoperative navigation or comparing these 3D methods with conventional methods. Furthermore, at least one of the following outcomes needed to be included in the article: technical accuracy of the procedure, preoperative planning time, operative time, number of fixation points, patient satisfaction, complications, or total costs of the intervention.

Following the screening of 4478 articles, 17 were included. Five articles appeared to indicate a significantly better technical linear accuracy, one article reported better accuracy for rotation and two articles showed better accuracy in restoring orbital volume when using navigation. Nine articles investigated operative time with varying results. Seven articles calculated the additional costs, of which three concluded no extra cost while the others indicated high additional costs or questionable cost-effectiveness.

Virtual planning and intraoperative navigation technologies have the potential to assist maxillofacial trauma surgeons in reducing ZMC fractures significantly more accurately and restoring the facial contour in a less invasive manner at an acceptable cost.

The protocol for this systematic review (CRD42020216717) was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

To evaluate the impact of intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessment for the surgical management of zygomatic bone fracture (ZF).

A prospective study was conducted on patients operated on for unilateral ZF during a two-year period. Repositioning of the fractured zygoma was assessed intraoperatively by measuring the position of malar eminences in three dimensions on CBCT. A difference of more than 2 mm between both sides was considered significant and the reduction was judged inadequate. Surgical procedure was adapted to intraoperative imaging findings.

The surgical procedures of 47 patients treated for ZF were analyzed. In 15% of the cases (7 patients), the intraoperative CBCT showed an inadequate reduction while the morphological results seemed correct. Those patients benefited from an immediate correction of the reduction. From these 7 patients, reduction was optimized further without the need of osteosynthesis in one case, additional osteosynthesis was performed in 4 cases and 2 patients required both reduction and osteosynthesis revision.

Intraoperative CBCT control helps to achieve anatomic repositioning in case of ZF. It may reduce the risk of under-treatment and possible reoperation, and of over-treatment meaning systematic ORIF in all fractures.

In residual deformity cases, it is difficult to reposition the zygomaticomaxillary-complex (ZMC) intraoperatively, due to resorbed fracture edges, and lack of zygoma analysis to 3-dimensionally quantify the deformity. Instability after zygomatic osteotomy and miniplate fixation (ZOMF) due to the gap between osteotomized segments, scar tissue, muscle pull, and other factors is also unknown. The study aims to evaluate symmetry and stability after ZOMF.

In this prospective study, a ZMC analysis was designed and patients with unilateral post-traumatic residual deformity (>10 weeks) of ZMC were treated with ZOMF. Measurements were evaluated on affected and unaffected sides at preoperatively, immediately, and 6 months postoperatively using MIMICS software. The primary outcome variable was the symmetry and stability of ZMC. Secondary parameters were changes in orbital volume, diplopia, ocular motility, mouth opening, and patient satisfaction. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The continuous variables were compared by paired t-test. The change within the continuous variable with time was assessed by repeated measure ANOVA, followed by multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni test. The changes within the categorical variable were assessed by the McNemar test.

Ten patients were enrolled (mean age = 29.2 ± 9.97 years; male:female = 9:1; right:left = 4:6). The mean duration from trauma to surgery was 34.84 ± 31.35 weeks. There was an improvement in the symmetry in anteroposteriorly (P = .005), mediolaterally (P = .001), and at the arch (P = .011) postoperatively. All parameters remained stable at 6 months postoperatively (difference not significant, P > .05); with the median satisfaction score of 4 of 5. Significant improvement in mouth opening (P = .014) and orbital volume (P = .001) was noted.

Virtual measurements as per the proposed protocol helped in communication and quantifying ZMC. Four-point fixation with miniplates provided enough stability over the 6-month follow-up period.

Intraoperative imaging is increasingly used by surgeons and has become an integral part of many surgical procedures. This study was performed to provide an overview of the current literature on the intraoperative use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in maxillofacial surgery. A bibliographic search of PubMed was conducted in March 2020, without time limitation, using “intraoperative imaging” AND “maxillofacial surgery” AND “cone beam computed tomography” as key words. Ninety-one articles were found; after complete reading, 16 articles met the eligibility criteria and were analysed. The results showed that the majority of the indications were related to maxillofacial trauma, particularly zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Final verification with intraoperative CBCT before wound closure was the most common use of this device. However, innovative uses of intraoperative CBCT are expanding, such as CBCT coupling with mirror computational planning, and even the combined use of initial intraoperative CBCT acquisition with navigation. Immediate, fast, and easy evaluation of bone repositioning to avoid the need for further surgical revision is the main advantage of this technique. Imaging quality is comparable to that of multi-slice computed tomography, but with lower radiation exposure. Nevertheless, CBCT is still not widely available in maxillofacial centres, probably because of its cost, and perhaps because not everyone is aware of its advantages and versatility, which are reported in this review.