Surgical oncology and reconstruction
Risk Factors for Free Flap Failure in 2,846 Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A National Database Study in Japan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.009Get rights and content

Purpose

The risk factors for an unfavorable outcome after microvascular free flap reconstruction in head and neck cancer are not fully understood. We sought to identify factors affecting the occurrence of free flap failure.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the national inpatient database in Japan between 2010 and 2012. We identified patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer who underwent tumor resection and consecutive free flap reconstruction. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess risk factors for free flap failure. The threshold for significance was P < .05. Missing data were imputed by using multiple imputation.

Results

We identified 2,846 eligible patients. The overall proportion of free flap failure was 3.3%. Free flap failure was associated with diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18 to 2.76; P = .007), peripheral vascular disease (HR, 4.49; 95% CI, 1.61 to 12.52; P = .004), renal failure (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.45 to 9.33; P = .006), preoperative radiotherapy (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.13; P = .022), and duration of anesthesia greater than 18 hours (compared with <12 hours; HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.19 to 6.22; P = .018).

Conclusions

Diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, preoperative radiotherapy, and a longer duration of anesthesia were significant predictors of the occurrence of free flap failure.

Section snippets

Data Source

We used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national administrative claims and discharge abstract database in Japan. The details of the database have been described elsewhere.18 In brief, the number of contributing hospitals exceeded 1,000 and the database included the data of approximately 7 million patients recorded in 2012. The Diagnosis Procedure Combination database includes the following information: patient demographic characteristics; main diagnoses, comorbidities at

Results

We identified 2,899 patients with head and neck cancer who underwent tumor resection and consecutive free flap reconstruction during the study period. Of these patients, 53 met one or more of the exclusion criteria; we therefore included 2,846 eligible patients in our final analysis.

There were 94 free flap failures, for an incidence of 3.3%. Of the patients, 42 (1.5%) died during their hospital stay. Five of the patients who died had free flap failure. The median follow-up period was 65 days

Discussion

Using a national database in Japan, we performed a survival analysis for free flap failure of 2,846 patients with head and neck cancer undergoing tumor resection and consecutive free flap reconstruction. Overall, the incidence of free flap failure was 3.3%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.5%. Cox proportional hazards regression indicated that diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, preoperative radiotherapy, and duration of anesthesia greater than 18 hours

References (31)

  • C. Corbitt et al.

    Free flap failure in head and neck reconstruction

    Head Neck

    (2014)
  • K.M. Pattani et al.

    What makes a good flap go bad? A critical analysis of the literature of intraoperative factors related to free flap failure

    Laryngoscope

    (2010)
  • A. Loupatatzi et al.

    Are females predisposed to complications in head and neck cancer free flap reconstruction?

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2014)
  • S. Ferrari et al.

    Free flaps in elderly patients: Outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstruction after oncological resection

    J Craniomaxillofac Surg

    (2013)
  • O.K. Coskunfirat et al.

    The safety of microvascular free tissue transfer in the elderly population

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2005)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Microvascular reconstruction in elderly oral cancer patients: Does diabetes status have a predictive role in free flap complications?

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2015)
  • V. Valentini et al.

    Diabetes as main risk factor in head and neck reconstructive surgery with free flaps

    J Craniofac Surg

    (2008)
  • P. Rosado et al.

    Influence of diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications and failure in head and neck free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Head Neck

    (2015)
  • J. Shum et al.

    Low prealbumin level is a risk factor for microvascular free flap failure

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2014)
  • B. Singh et al.

    Factors associated with complications in microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defect

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1999)
  • G.J. Nobel et al.

    Predictors of complications of free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery: Analysis of 304 free flap reconstruction procedures

    Laryngoscope

    (2012)
  • J. Tall et al.

    Vascular complications after radiotherapy in head and neck free flap reconstruction: Clinical outcome related to vascular biology

    Ann Plast Surg

    (2015)
  • M.J. Benatar et al.

    Impact of preoperative radiotherapy on head and neck free flap reconstruction: A report on 429 cases

    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

    (2012)
  • A. Bourget et al.

    Free flap reconstruction in the head and neck region following radiotherapy: A cohort study identifying negative outcome predictors

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1901)
  • A.J. Rosenberg et al.

    A prospective study on prognostic factors for free-flap reconstructions of head and neck defects

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2009)
  • Cited by (83)

    • Flap loss in head and neck reconstruction: Is there a singular cause for failure?

      2024, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
    • Larynx Cancer: Reconstructive Options

      2023, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by grants for Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (grant Nos. H27-Policy-Designated-009 and H27-Policy-Strategy-011).

    View full text