Original article
Characteristics of ossification of the spinal ligament; incidence of ossification of the ligamentum flavum in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament – Analysis of the whole spine using multidetector CT

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2016.04.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) are characterized by replacement of ligamentous tissue by ectopic new bone formation. Although the background of both diseases might be similar, there are some differences between two diseases. Some patients have both OPLL and OLF. However, the incidence of both OPLL and OLF is still unclear and the precise lesions have not been investigated, yet. This study was conducted to evaluate OLF of the whole spine in patients with cervical OPLL and to analyze the relationship of the ossified lesions between OLF and OPLL.

Methods

One hundred seventy eight patients who were diagnosed as cervical OPLL by plain radiographs were included. CT images of the whole spine were taken. Ossified lesions were checked at each level of vertebral body and intervertebral disc. The ossification index of OPLL (OPLL OS index) was determined by the sum of the levels of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs where OPLL existed. The same index was applied for detecting the level of OLF (OLF OS index). Age, gender and OPLL characteristics were compared between the OLF(+) group, OLF was seen at any levels of the spinal canal, and the OLF(−) group, OLF was not seen.

Results

The most frequent level of OPLL was at C5 vertebral level and OLF was predominant at upper and lower thoracic levels. Seventeen patients (9.6%) had OPLL and OLF at the same spinal level. The averaged OPLL OS index of the total spine in these patients was 8.7 ± 6.1, ranged from 1 to 36. The averaged OLF OS index of the total spine was 3.1 ± 2.2 (ranged from 1 to 13) in the patients who had OLF at any levels of the whole spine. One hundred fifteen patients (64.6%) with cervical OPLL had OLF at any levels of the whole spine. No relationship was found between the OPLL OS index and the OLF OS index. There was no significant difference among the data between the OLF(+) group and the OLF(−) group.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated 64.6% of the patients with cervical OPLL had OLF, mainly in the thoracic spine. However, there was no relationship regarding the severity of the ossified lesions between OPLL and OLF. CT analysis of the whole spine should be carried out for the early detection of OPLL and OLF in patients with cervical OPLL.

Introduction

Ossified lesions in the spinal canal have a risk of spinal cord and nerve roots compression. Diseases, such as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF), are in the category of ossified lesions in the spinal canal. OPLL and OLF are characterized by replacement of ligamentous tissue by ectopic new bone formation [1], [2], [3]. Although the background of both diseases might be similar, there are some differences between two diseases. OPLL mainly affects the cervical spine, and often results in cervical myelopathy [4]. In contrast, OLF is predominantly observed at the upper or lower third of the thoracic spine and may cause thoracic myelopathy due to narrowing of the spinal canal [5], [6]. The etiology of OPLL and OLF is still unknown. Some studies have found that genetic background is strongly related to OPLL [7]. Several candidate genes for cervical OPLL were identified to date [8], [9], [10]. But, no significant candidate genes were found for OLF. In the clinical practice, we sometimes encounter the cases who have OPLL in the cervical spine and OLF in the thoracic spine [11], [12], [13], [14]. Some cases have spinal cord compression by both OPLL and OLF at the same spinal level, especially in the thoracic spine. These cases were very difficult to treat. However, the precise lesions of OPLL and OLF are still unclear. Recently, we performed the study to evaluate the coexisting OPLL in patients with cervical OPLL using multi-detector CT of the whole spine [15]. The study demonstrated that more than half of the patients with cervical OPLL had coexistent OPLL in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine. Our study regarding OPLL lesions of the whole spine by CT can also be used for the detection of OLF in the spinal canal. This information should be very beneficial to consider the therapeutic strategy in patients with ossified lesions in the spinal canal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate OLF of the whole spine in patients with cervical OPLL and to analyze the relationship of the ossified lesions between OLF and OPLL.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This study included 178 patients who were diagnosed as cervical OPLL by plain radiographs. All of the patients were treated in our university hospital. There were 108 men and 70 women, with an average age of 67.0 years old (range, 36–86 years). Informed consent was obtained from each patient before enrollment in the study, and the study was approved by the institutional review board of our university hospital. Regarding medical history, 79 patients had a history of cervical laminoplasty which

Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and agreement

Averaged Fleiss' Kappa coefficient of inter-rater agreement of OLF was 0.61 ± 0.11 in three observers. The intra-rater reliability for the existence of OPLL was 94.6% (95% CI 94.4–94.8), 93.5% (95% CI 93.2–93.7) and 94.5% (95% CI 94.2–94.7), respectively.

Incidence of spinal level of OPLL and OLF

OPLL was seen both at vertebral and intervertebral levels (Fig. 1). The most frequent level of OPLL was at C5 vertebral level where 82% of the patients had OPLL. Subsequently, C4 and C6 vertebral level was frequent. At the thoracic and lumbar

Discussion

Our previous study revealed the precise ossified lesion of OPLL at the whole spine using CT images [15]. As for the evaluation for OPLL, the averaged Fleiss Kappa coefficient of inter-rater agreement was 0.83 ± 0.008. The intra-rater reliability for the existence of OPLL was 81.5% (95%confidence interval, 77.7–84.7), 98.1% (95% confidence interval, 96.5–99.0), and 92.7% (95% confidence interval, 90.0–94.7). The current study focused on OLF using the same CT images. Similarly to the previous

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

The work reported in this article was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan: Committee for Study of Ossification of Spinal Ligament and Committee for Research and Development of Therapies for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

The authors thank Mika Kigawa, for her effort in statistical analysis.

References (23)

  • M. Nakajima et al.

    A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine

    Nat Genet

    (2014 Sep)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Classification, epidemiology, and genetics of degenerative cervical myelopathy

      2023, Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: from Basic Science to Clinical Practice
    • Coexistence of flavum ligament ossification with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in the cervical spine: Review of literature and technical note starting from a rare case

      2022, Neurochirurgie
      Citation Excerpt :

      This major finding coexists with calcified cartilage areas and already ossified zones of lamellar or trabecular bone with or without continuity with laminae [6,8,16] (Fig. 5). At other hand, calcification is characterized by foci of calcium hydroxyapatite depositions into already degenerated ligament, with no mature bone forming within the ligament itself [3,6,8,16]. Ossification of ligamentum flavum is an uncommon condition at all spinal level in Caucasians [3,17].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text