Elsevier

The Journal of Pediatrics

Volume 159, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 420-424
The Journal of Pediatrics

Original Article
Diagnostic Value of Nasal Nitric Oxide Measured with Non-Velum Closure Techniques for Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.03.007Get rights and content

Objectives

Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is a reliable non-invasive screening test for primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), but the recommended technique, exhalation against resistance (ER), requires cooperation limiting its use in young children. Our objectives were to determine whether easier non-velum closure techniques have the ability to discriminate PCD and longitudinal reproducibility.

Study design

We conducted a case-control study evaluating 5 breathing techniques (ER, breath hold, tidal breathing mouth open, tidal breathing mouth closed, and humming) for measuring nNO in patients with PCD compared with control subjects (cystic fibrosis [CF], non-PCD non-CF bronchiectasis, and healthy). A subgroup repeated measurements 1 month later. Sensitivity, specificity, and intraclass correlation coefficient of each nNO technique were determined.

Results

We tested 85 children (20 PCD, 32 CF, 14 broncheoctasis, and 19 healthy), aged 5 to 18 years (mean age, 11.5 years); 52% of children were male. All breathing techniques discriminated patients with PCD from control subjects with high specificity (>90%), 100% sensitivity, and intraclass correlation coefficient >0.8. nNO output cutoff values for diagnosing PCD varied with techniques (ER, 59 nL/min; breath hold, 61 nL/min; tidal breathing mouth open, 37 nL/min; tidal breathing mouth closed, 30 nL/min; humming, 41 nL/min).

Conclusion

Non-velum closure techniques are reproducible and valid to discriminate PCD; however, they generally yield lower values than ER.

Section snippets

Methods

This study was designed as a case-control diagnostic test validation study with longitudinal follow-up (for assessment of longitudinal reliability) in a subsample. The study was approved by the SickKids Research ethics board, and written informed consent and assent was obtained from each participating child, parent, or both, as appropriate.

Subjects with PCD, cystic fibrosis (CF), and non-PCD non-CF bronchiectasis (BE) aged 5 to 18 years were recruited from the outpatient clinics at the Hospital

Results

The 85 participating study subjects (Table I) had a mean age of 11.5 years (range, 5 to 18 years), and all were able to comply with all 5 breathing techniques. Within the PCD group, 8 subjects (40%) had situs inversus totalis, 2 subjects (10%) had situs ambiguous, and 10 subjects (50%) had situs solitus; 18 subjects (90%) reported a history of neonatal respiratory distress, 18 subjects (90%) reported recurrent otitis media, and 15 subjects (75%) had bronchiectasis detected on computed

Discussion

The results of this study show that all the breathing techniques tested were reproducible and valid to discriminate PCD from disease and healthy controls in subjects older than 5 years. We also demonstrated that different cutoff values are required for each breathing technique to achieve optimum sensitivity and specificity as a screening test for PCD.

Earlier studies have used multiple breathing techniques to measure nNO in healthy control subjects,12,13 showing, similar to our data, lower

References (12)

  • G.L. Piacentini et al.

    Nasal nitric oxide for early diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: practical issues in children

    Respir Med

    (2008)
  • J.O. Lundberg et al.

    Primarily nasal origin of exhaled nitric oxide and absence in Kartagener’s syndrome

    Eur Respir J

    (1994)
  • ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2005)
  • A. Bush et al.

    Primary ciliary dyskinesia: current state of the art

    Arch Dis Child

    (2007)
  • A. Bush et al.

    Primary ciliary dyskinesia: diagnosis and standards of care

    Eur Respir J

    (1998)
  • E. Weitzberg et al.

    Humming greatly increases nasal nitric oxide

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (56)

  • Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

    2016, Clinics in Chest Medicine
  • Diagnostic Methods in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

    2016, Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although measurement is recommended during a velum closure breath-hold [33], tidal breathing produces a reasonable alternative if breath-hold cannot be achieved e.g. young children [32]. Tidal breathing measurements are lower in both PCD and controls [31,32,34,35,39,40] and are less discriminatory than measures during a velum-closure breath-hold. In summary, nNO provides an excellent screening test for PCD, and we now need standardisation of methods of analysis and reporting.

  • Establishing normative nasal nitric oxide values in infants

    2015, Respiratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    More recently, the measurement of nasal nitric oxide (nNO) has been shown to be useful for PCD screening, as PCD patients are observed to have nNO levels that are only 10–20% of normal, healthy controls [5,6]. Nasal NO values are detectable in neonates within hours of being born and measurements are relatively easy to obtain, reproducible, and noninvasive [7–9]. Several nNO sampling methods exist whereby a small sampling cannula is placed just into the naris and the amount of nNO being produced by the nasal sinuses is analyzed [10].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funded by a grant from the Pediatric Consultants Group of The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

View full text