Original ArticleDiagnostic Value of Nasal Nitric Oxide Measured with Non-Velum Closure Techniques for Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
Section snippets
Methods
This study was designed as a case-control diagnostic test validation study with longitudinal follow-up (for assessment of longitudinal reliability) in a subsample. The study was approved by the SickKids Research ethics board, and written informed consent and assent was obtained from each participating child, parent, or both, as appropriate.
Subjects with PCD, cystic fibrosis (CF), and non-PCD non-CF bronchiectasis (BE) aged 5 to 18 years were recruited from the outpatient clinics at the Hospital
Results
The 85 participating study subjects (Table I) had a mean age of 11.5 years (range, 5 to 18 years), and all were able to comply with all 5 breathing techniques. Within the PCD group, 8 subjects (40%) had situs inversus totalis, 2 subjects (10%) had situs ambiguous, and 10 subjects (50%) had situs solitus; 18 subjects (90%) reported a history of neonatal respiratory distress, 18 subjects (90%) reported recurrent otitis media, and 15 subjects (75%) had bronchiectasis detected on computed
Discussion
The results of this study show that all the breathing techniques tested were reproducible and valid to discriminate PCD from disease and healthy controls in subjects older than 5 years. We also demonstrated that different cutoff values are required for each breathing technique to achieve optimum sensitivity and specificity as a screening test for PCD.
Earlier studies have used multiple breathing techniques to measure nNO in healthy control subjects,12,13 showing, similar to our data, lower
References (12)
- et al.
Nasal nitric oxide for early diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: practical issues in children
Respir Med
(2008) - et al.
Primarily nasal origin of exhaled nitric oxide and absence in Kartagener’s syndrome
Eur Respir J
(1994) ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
(2005)- et al.
Primary ciliary dyskinesia: current state of the art
Arch Dis Child
(2007) - et al.
Primary ciliary dyskinesia: diagnosis and standards of care
Eur Respir J
(1998) - et al.
Humming greatly increases nasal nitric oxide
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
(2002)
Cited by (56)
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
2016, Clinics in Chest MedicineDiagnostic Methods in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
2016, Paediatric Respiratory ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Although measurement is recommended during a velum closure breath-hold [33], tidal breathing produces a reasonable alternative if breath-hold cannot be achieved e.g. young children [32]. Tidal breathing measurements are lower in both PCD and controls [31,32,34,35,39,40] and are less discriminatory than measures during a velum-closure breath-hold. In summary, nNO provides an excellent screening test for PCD, and we now need standardisation of methods of analysis and reporting.
Establishing normative nasal nitric oxide values in infants
2015, Respiratory MedicineCitation Excerpt :More recently, the measurement of nasal nitric oxide (nNO) has been shown to be useful for PCD screening, as PCD patients are observed to have nNO levels that are only 10–20% of normal, healthy controls [5,6]. Nasal NO values are detectable in neonates within hours of being born and measurements are relatively easy to obtain, reproducible, and noninvasive [7–9]. Several nNO sampling methods exist whereby a small sampling cannula is placed just into the naris and the amount of nNO being produced by the nasal sinuses is analyzed [10].
Device comparison study to measure nasal nitric oxide in relation to primary ciliary dyskinesia
2024, Journal of Breath ResearchResearch Progress of Experimental and Numerical Study on Nitric Oxide Distributions in Nasal Cavity
2023, Yiyong Shengwu Lixue/Journal of Medical BiomechanicsRole of Nasal Nitric Oxide in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia and Other Respiratory Conditions in Children
2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Funded by a grant from the Pediatric Consultants Group of The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.