Switching to duloxetine in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor non- and partial-responders: Effects on painful physical symptoms of depression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.07.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Painful physical symptoms (PPS) are common in patients with depression. Our objective was to evaluate the presence of PPS in a sample of SSRI non- or partial-responders with MDD and examine the effect of a switch to duloxetine on those PPS. Outpatients who met criteria for MDD despite having taken an SSRI antidepressant for at least 6 weeks, and who had a Hamilton depression rating scale total score of at least 15 and a clinical global impression of severity score of at least 3, were randomized to switch to duloxetine by either a direct switch or a start-taper switch method. PPS were assessed at baseline and at the study endpoint using various measures including six visual analog scales (VAS) for pain (overall pain, headache, back pain, shoulder pain, interference with daily activities, and time in pain while awake), the pain subscale of the symptom questionnaire-somatic subscale, and the bodily pain subscale of the short form-36 item health survey. Clinically significant levels of pain (mean baseline VAS scores >30 mm) were seen across all VAS pain measures prior to switching. Switch to duloxetine was associated with significant improvements on all pain measures regardless of switch method, and there was evidence for an earlier reduction in pain in the start-taper switch group. In summary, MDD patients who were non- or partial-responders to SSRI treatment were found to have clinically significant pain which improved significantly following switch to duloxetine regardless of the switch method utilized.

Introduction

Depression is known to present with a wide variety of emotional and somatic symptoms including low mood, anhedonia, anxiety, sleep, and appetite disturbance. In addition, pain is increasingly recognized as a symptom of depression, and recent evaluations of the prevalence and character of painful physical symptoms (PPS) associated with depression suggest that such symptoms are common, and treatment of these symptoms plays an important role in achieving optimal outcomes including improved remission and functioning (Kroenke et al., 1994, Karp et al., 2004, Ohayon, 2004, Fava et al., 2004). In one study, approximately 65% of patients with depression in primary care settings were reported to have concomitant pain, (Bair et al., 2003) and in a population-based telephone survey, subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) were found to be at a four times greater risk of suffering from a chronic painful physical condition than those without MDD (Ohayon and Schatzberg, 2003). In a recent presentation of data from a post-hoc analysis of prevention of recurrent episodes of depression with Venlafaxine XR (PREVENT) study, the authors reported that moderate to severe PPS were highly prevalent in outpatients with MDD and were highly significantly associated with anxiety and depression severity (Ahmed et al., 2007). Additionally, the coexistence of depression and pain often leads to decreased productivity and results in lower rates of help seeking (Demyttenaere et al., 2006). The presence of PPS can also negatively impact longer-term depression treatment outcomes, with a significantly shorter time to depressive recurrence seen in patients with residual PPS compared with those without (Judd et al., 1998).

Dysregulation of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) neurotransmission, which is believed to play a role in depression, may also lead to an hyperalgesic state in patients with depression (Stahl, 2002) due to the role of 5-HT and NE in the modulatory descending spinal pain pathways (Fields et al., 1991, Jones, 1991). Consistent with this, duloxetine (a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, or SNRI), has been shown to be effective in treating PPS associated with depression (Brannan et al., 2005, Goldstein et al., 2004) as well as core emotional depressive symptoms.

In general, patients presenting with an episode of depression are treated initially with antidepressant monotherapy, often selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). As evidenced by numerous studies including the recent STAR-D study (Rush et al., 2006), however, suboptimal response to the initial antidepressant agent is common, and in the event of suboptimal treatment response, there are a number of possible approaches that can be employed including increasing the dose (e.g. Bauer et al., 2002), augmentation with another antidepressant (e.g. Fava and Rush, 2006), or switching within the same class or to another class of antidepressant (Peselow et al., 1989, Fava, 2000, Thase et al., 2002). A variety of different ways of switching between antidepressants may be employed, some of which have been studied in clinical trials (e.g. Fava et al., 2001, Kreider et al., 1995). Previous switching studies have not however studied in detail what happens to PPS associated with depression following antidepressant switch.

Our objective therefore was to evaluate the presence of PPS in SSRI non- or partial-responders, and to examine the impact of a switch to the SNRI duloxetine on these painful symptoms. Previously, we have reported on overall changes in depression and pain (Perahia et al., 2008). Herein, we focus on the time course of improvement in pain as well as changes in specific pain symptoms. For context, the overall findings from Perahia et al (2008) are briefly repeated.

Section snippets

Study design

Data were taken from an open-label, randomized trial assessing efficacy and safety/tolerability outcomes in SSRI non- or partial-responders switched to duloxetine which has previously been described in detail (Perahia et al., 2008). The study was conducted in four European countries (Spain, France, Italy, and the UK), and all investigators were psychiatrists. The study design is shown in Fig. 1. Patients were screened for study eligibility in study period I. In study period II, eligible

Results

A total of 368 outpatients, mostly female (77.0% DS, 76.8% STS) and Caucasian (100% DS, 98.9% STS) patients, were randomly assigned to either the DS (N = 183) or STS (N = 185) treatment groups. Gender distribution was similar to previously published duloxetine studies (e.g. Detke et al., 2004) and indeed published studies of other antidepressants. The patient baseline demographics were not significantly different between the two switch groups (Table 1). Baseline clinical characteristics of these

Discussion

In a recent publication (Perahia et al., 2008), we reported that the efficacy, safety, and tolerability outcomes following switch of SSRI non- or partial-responders to duloxetine were similar regardless of whether a DS or STS method was used. Both switch groups had a significant mean baseline to endpoint reduction in HAMD17 total score, with no significant difference between the two switch groups. The current paper focuses on pain-related outcomes, demonstrating that a switch of SSRI non- or

Contributors

Dr. Perahia was the physician responsible for overseeing the conduct of this study. He was involved in all aspects of data review and interpretation. He has also been involved in the planning and presentation of all data disclosures from this study, including writing and reviewing this manuscript. Ms. Quail was the statistician responsible for planning the data analyses and was also involved in the planning of study data disclosures and review of this manuscript. Dr. Desaiah worked with Dr.

Role of funding source

This study was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Conflict of interest statement

David Perahia, Deborah Quail, and Durisala Desaiah are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and stockholders of the company. Dr. Montejo has served as a consultant to a number of companies with an interest in depressive disorders (Lilly, Lundbeck, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline, and Wyeth). He has received research grants from a number of companies with an interest in depressive disorders (Lilly, Pfizer, Lundbeck, and Servier), and has accepted paid speaking engagements in industry-supported satellite

Acknowledgements

The authors accept full responsibility for the conduct of this study, had full access to all data from this study, and participated in the decision to publish the data.

References (31)

  • Fava M, Mallinckrodt CH, Detke MJ, Watkin JG, Wohlreich MM. The effect of duloxetine on painful physical symptoms in...
  • M. Fava

    Management of nonresponse and intolerance: switching strategies

    Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • M. Fava et al.

    Current status of augmentation and combination treatments for major depressive disorder: a literature review and a proposal for a novel approach to improve practice

    Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

    (2006)
  • H.L. Fields et al.

    Neurotransmitters in nociceptive modulatory circuits

    Annual Review of Neuroscience

    (1991)
  • Goldstein DJ, Lu Y, Detke MJ, Wiltse C, Mallinckrodt C, Demitrack MA. Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: a...
  • Cited by (55)

    • Depression and adult neurogenesis: Positive effects of the antidepressant fluoxetine and of physical exercise

      2018, Brain Research Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      Depression is the most common psychiatric disorder, affecting more than 350 million people in the world (Smith, 2014). It is characterized by low mood, anxiety, anhedonia and reduced ability to concentrate (American Psychiatric Association, 1994; Perahia et al., 2009; Willner et al., 2013). The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine are among the pharmaceutical drugs most used for therapy.

    • Validated UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of eight saikosaponins in rat plasma: Application to a comparative pharmacokinetic study in depression rats after oral administration of extracts of raw and vinegar-baked Bupleuri Radix

      2017, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Depression is a mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks of low mood that is present across most situations and has been becoming one of the most common mental disorders in the world [1,2].

    • Examining the role of neuroinflammation in major depression

      2015, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the prevalence of MDD continues to rise worldwide, many treatment options for patients remain ineffective. Greater than half of all MDD patients receiving first-line treatments (Gartlehner et al., 2011), and approximately two-thirds of those receiving Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs; Perahia et al., 2009), do not achieve remission. A study conducted by Fitzgerald et al. (2006) evaluated the sensitivity of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in treatment resistant MDD patients (n=19) versus healthy controls (n=38).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text