Switching to duloxetine in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor non- and partial-responders: Effects on painful physical symptoms of depression
Introduction
Depression is known to present with a wide variety of emotional and somatic symptoms including low mood, anhedonia, anxiety, sleep, and appetite disturbance. In addition, pain is increasingly recognized as a symptom of depression, and recent evaluations of the prevalence and character of painful physical symptoms (PPS) associated with depression suggest that such symptoms are common, and treatment of these symptoms plays an important role in achieving optimal outcomes including improved remission and functioning (Kroenke et al., 1994, Karp et al., 2004, Ohayon, 2004, Fava et al., 2004). In one study, approximately 65% of patients with depression in primary care settings were reported to have concomitant pain, (Bair et al., 2003) and in a population-based telephone survey, subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) were found to be at a four times greater risk of suffering from a chronic painful physical condition than those without MDD (Ohayon and Schatzberg, 2003). In a recent presentation of data from a post-hoc analysis of prevention of recurrent episodes of depression with Venlafaxine XR (PREVENT) study, the authors reported that moderate to severe PPS were highly prevalent in outpatients with MDD and were highly significantly associated with anxiety and depression severity (Ahmed et al., 2007). Additionally, the coexistence of depression and pain often leads to decreased productivity and results in lower rates of help seeking (Demyttenaere et al., 2006). The presence of PPS can also negatively impact longer-term depression treatment outcomes, with a significantly shorter time to depressive recurrence seen in patients with residual PPS compared with those without (Judd et al., 1998).
Dysregulation of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) neurotransmission, which is believed to play a role in depression, may also lead to an hyperalgesic state in patients with depression (Stahl, 2002) due to the role of 5-HT and NE in the modulatory descending spinal pain pathways (Fields et al., 1991, Jones, 1991). Consistent with this, duloxetine (a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, or SNRI), has been shown to be effective in treating PPS associated with depression (Brannan et al., 2005, Goldstein et al., 2004) as well as core emotional depressive symptoms.
In general, patients presenting with an episode of depression are treated initially with antidepressant monotherapy, often selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). As evidenced by numerous studies including the recent STAR-D study (Rush et al., 2006), however, suboptimal response to the initial antidepressant agent is common, and in the event of suboptimal treatment response, there are a number of possible approaches that can be employed including increasing the dose (e.g. Bauer et al., 2002), augmentation with another antidepressant (e.g. Fava and Rush, 2006), or switching within the same class or to another class of antidepressant (Peselow et al., 1989, Fava, 2000, Thase et al., 2002). A variety of different ways of switching between antidepressants may be employed, some of which have been studied in clinical trials (e.g. Fava et al., 2001, Kreider et al., 1995). Previous switching studies have not however studied in detail what happens to PPS associated with depression following antidepressant switch.
Our objective therefore was to evaluate the presence of PPS in SSRI non- or partial-responders, and to examine the impact of a switch to the SNRI duloxetine on these painful symptoms. Previously, we have reported on overall changes in depression and pain (Perahia et al., 2008). Herein, we focus on the time course of improvement in pain as well as changes in specific pain symptoms. For context, the overall findings from Perahia et al (2008) are briefly repeated.
Section snippets
Study design
Data were taken from an open-label, randomized trial assessing efficacy and safety/tolerability outcomes in SSRI non- or partial-responders switched to duloxetine which has previously been described in detail (Perahia et al., 2008). The study was conducted in four European countries (Spain, France, Italy, and the UK), and all investigators were psychiatrists. The study design is shown in Fig. 1. Patients were screened for study eligibility in study period I. In study period II, eligible
Results
A total of 368 outpatients, mostly female (77.0% DS, 76.8% STS) and Caucasian (100% DS, 98.9% STS) patients, were randomly assigned to either the DS (N = 183) or STS (N = 185) treatment groups. Gender distribution was similar to previously published duloxetine studies (e.g. Detke et al., 2004) and indeed published studies of other antidepressants. The patient baseline demographics were not significantly different between the two switch groups (Table 1). Baseline clinical characteristics of these
Discussion
In a recent publication (Perahia et al., 2008), we reported that the efficacy, safety, and tolerability outcomes following switch of SSRI non- or partial-responders to duloxetine were similar regardless of whether a DS or STS method was used. Both switch groups had a significant mean baseline to endpoint reduction in HAMD17 total score, with no significant difference between the two switch groups. The current paper focuses on pain-related outcomes, demonstrating that a switch of SSRI non- or
Contributors
Dr. Perahia was the physician responsible for overseeing the conduct of this study. He was involved in all aspects of data review and interpretation. He has also been involved in the planning and presentation of all data disclosures from this study, including writing and reviewing this manuscript. Ms. Quail was the statistician responsible for planning the data analyses and was also involved in the planning of study data disclosures and review of this manuscript. Dr. Desaiah worked with Dr.
Role of funding source
This study was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Conflict of interest statement
David Perahia, Deborah Quail, and Durisala Desaiah are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and stockholders of the company. Dr. Montejo has served as a consultant to a number of companies with an interest in depressive disorders (Lilly, Lundbeck, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline, and Wyeth). He has received research grants from a number of companies with an interest in depressive disorders (Lilly, Pfizer, Lundbeck, and Servier), and has accepted paid speaking engagements in industry-supported satellite
Acknowledgements
The authors accept full responsibility for the conduct of this study, had full access to all data from this study, and participated in the decision to publish the data.
References (31)
- et al.
Duloxetine 60 mg once-daily in the treatment of painful physical symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder
Journal of Psychiatric Research
(2005) - et al.
Comorbid painful physical symptoms and depression: prevalence, work loss, and help seeking
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2006) - et al.
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial
European Neuropsychopharmacology
(2004) Descending noradrenergic influences on pain
Progress in Brain Research
(1991)- et al.
Major depressive disorder: a prospective study of residual subthreshold depressive symptoms as predictor of rapid relapse
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1998) - et al.
Prevalence and clinical correlates of pain in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder
European Neuropsychopharmacology
(2007) - et al.
Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review
Archives of Internal Medicine
(2003) - et al.
World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders, Part 1: Acute and continuation treatment of major depressive disorder
World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
(2002) - et al.
The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale
Anesthesia and Analgesia
(1998) - et al.
Efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in major depressive disorder patients after SSRI treatment failure: an open-label trial
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
(2001)
Management of nonresponse and intolerance: switching strategies
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Current status of augmentation and combination treatments for major depressive disorder: a literature review and a proposal for a novel approach to improve practice
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Neurotransmitters in nociceptive modulatory circuits
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Cited by (55)
Consensus on the detection and management of patients with depression and pain as an associated somatic symptom
2024, Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental HealthDepression and adult neurogenesis: Positive effects of the antidepressant fluoxetine and of physical exercise
2018, Brain Research BulletinCitation Excerpt :Depression is the most common psychiatric disorder, affecting more than 350 million people in the world (Smith, 2014). It is characterized by low mood, anxiety, anhedonia and reduced ability to concentrate (American Psychiatric Association, 1994; Perahia et al., 2009; Willner et al., 2013). The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine are among the pharmaceutical drugs most used for therapy.
Validated UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of eight saikosaponins in rat plasma: Application to a comparative pharmacokinetic study in depression rats after oral administration of extracts of raw and vinegar-baked Bupleuri Radix
2017, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life SciencesCitation Excerpt :Depression is a mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks of low mood that is present across most situations and has been becoming one of the most common mental disorders in the world [1,2].
Examining the role of neuroinflammation in major depression
2015, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :Although the prevalence of MDD continues to rise worldwide, many treatment options for patients remain ineffective. Greater than half of all MDD patients receiving first-line treatments (Gartlehner et al., 2011), and approximately two-thirds of those receiving Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs; Perahia et al., 2009), do not achieve remission. A study conducted by Fitzgerald et al. (2006) evaluated the sensitivity of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in treatment resistant MDD patients (n=19) versus healthy controls (n=38).
Predictors of Changes in Quality of Life of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder—A Prospective Naturalistic 3-Month Follow-Up Study
2023, Journal of Clinical Medicine