Short Communication
Alexithymia and pain in temporomandibular disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.05.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To clarify the relationship of global alexithymia and its facets with pain, assessed prospectively using experience sampling methods (ESMs), in temporomandibular disorder (TMD).

Methods

People with painful TMD (n=49), pain-free somatic controls (24 people with disk displacement), and healthy controls (n=28) completed measures of alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 [TAS-20]) and depressed mood. Patients with painful TMD used ESM to record jaw pain multiple times daily for a week.

Results

The somatic and the healthy controls were equivalent on alexithymia and were combined. The painful TMD group had higher difficulty in identifying feelings but lower externally oriented thinking (EOT); only the latter effect remained after covarying depressed mood. Among patients with painful TMD, the TAS-20 total and EOT correlated positively with pain severity after controlling for depressed mood.

Conclusion

Findings highlight the complex relationships of alexithymia and its facets to TMD pain. Research should examine alexithymia facets separately and distinguish between methods that compare groups on alexithymia (e.g., pain patients versus controls) and those that correlate alexithymia with pain severity within a group.

Introduction

Chronic pain patients typically have higher alexithymia levels than controls [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Correlational studies, however, have had with mixed results, with some studies showing a positive relationship between alexithymia and acute pain during laboratory procedures [7], [8], [9], but other studies reporting limited or no relationships between alexithymia and pain severity [1], [2], [10]. Thus, it remains unclear whether alexithymia is elevated only when pain patients as a group are compared with pain-free controls or whether alexithymia also is associated with the severity of pain among chronic pain patients.

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) involve the muscles of mastication and the hard and soft tissues of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) [11], [12]. Primary symptoms of TMD are pain, clicking or grating sounds in the joint, and difficulty opening the mouth wide. Signs of TMD are intermittently experienced by many people, but only 5% to 10% of adults seek treatment for the disorder [13], [14]. Two surveys in Finland found that people reporting orofacial pain reported higher alexithymia than did asymptomatic people [15], [16], but respondents in these studies did not receive evaluations or diagnoses of TMD.

A number of issues remain unclear. First, it is unknown whether alexithymia is elevated among people with formally diagnosed, painful TMD, and whether alexithymia is elevated in those with TMJ dysfunction that lacks pain (e.g., TMD disk displacement). Second, the relationship between alexithymia and pain severity among those with painful TMD needs to be evaluated. Third, research should examine whether the various facets of alexithymia (as measured with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20; TAS-20) [17] relate to pain differently. For example, the facets of difficulty identifying feelings (DIF) and difficulty describing feelings (DDF) often predict symptoms, whereas externally oriented thinking (EOT) often does not [18], [19], [20], [21]. Fourth, analyses should test whether alexithymia is related to pain both before and after controlling for negative affect [22], [23]. Finally, previous studies of alexithymia and pain have measured pain with retrospective questionnaires, which have various limitations and usually overestimate the relationship magnitude. Experience sampling methodology (ESM) obviates these limitations by prompting respondents at random times during the day to report their pain as currently experienced, but ESM has not been used in any alexithymia study.

This study examined the relationship between alexithymia and painful TMD using two methods. We first tested the hypothesis that alexithymia is higher among people with diagnosed painful TMD compared with two control groups—people with pain-free TMD and healthy controls. Second, we assessed pain severity using ESM among people with painful TMD and correlated alexithymia with pain severity. In both sets of analyses, we examined global alexithymia and the three facets, and we examined the relationships both before and after controlling for depressed mood to test the unique role of alexithymia.

Section snippets

Participants and procedures

Participants were patients at a facial pain center or people recruited from the community. They provided informed consent and were assessed for TMD by two independent examiners [12]. Only people receiving the same diagnosis from both raters were included. Exclusion criteria were evidence of osteoarthritis or osteoarthrosis of the TMJ; history of major trauma to the head or neck; current use of an intraoral appliance; active orthodontic treatment; daily use of any analgesic, antidepressant, or

Comparing pain-free somatic and healthy groups

We first compared the two control groups on all TAS-20 scores to test whether alexithymia is elevated in people with a pain-free somatic disturbance. The groups did not differ (all P>.75), and the proportion of variance accounted for by group assignment was negligible (from .000 to .003). These two groups were combined into one pain-free control group (n=52) for subsequent analyses.

Comparing painful TMD and pain-free groups on alexithymia

Education correlated with TAS-20 total (r=−.30, P=.003), and DIF (r=−.34, P=.001), whereas age, gender, and race

Discussion

Two methods—comparison between groups and correlations within group—examined the relationship between alexithymia and TMD pain. Surprisingly, patients with painful TMD were not more globally alexithymic than pain-free controls, apparently because two facets of the TAS-20 operated in opposite directions. Participants with painful TMD had greater DIF than did pain-free controls, although this difference was fully accounted for by depressed mood. In contrast, those with painful TMD reported lower

Acknowledgments

We thank Chris Turner for his assistance. Portions of this study were carried out with the support of a grant from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, DE13563, to the first author.

References (32)

  • MA Lumley

    Alexithymia and negative emotional conditions

    J Psychosom Res

    (2000)
  • S Friedman et al.

    Alexithymia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is related to depression and not to somatic variables or compliance

    J Psychosom Res

    (2003)
  • MA Lumley et al.

    The relationship of alexithymia to subjective and biomedical measures of disease

    Psychosomatics

    (1997)
  • AG Glaros et al.

    Role of parafunctions, emotions, and stress in facial pain

    J Am Dent Assoc

    (2005)
  • SE Gramling

    Schedule-induced masseter EMG in facial pain subjects vs no-pain controls

    Physiol Behav

    (1997)
  • TG Sriram et al.

    Controlled study of alexithymic characteristics in patients with psychogenic pain disorder

    Psychother Psychosom

    (1987)
  • Cited by (50)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text