Collaborative stepped care for somatoform disorders: A pre–post-intervention study in primary care

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.11.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sofu-Net is a network for somatoform and functional disorders.

  • The interdisciplinary network promotes collaborative stepped health care.

  • We successfully established and evaluated Sofu-Net in a pre–post-intervention study.

  • Sofu-Net improved doctor–patient-communication and prescription behavior.

  • Collaborative stepped care might improve the management of somatoform disorders.

Abstract

Objective

The successful management of somatoform disorders in primary care is often limited due to low diagnostic accuracy, delayed referral to psychotherapy, and unstructured overuse of health care. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of establishing a collaborative stepped health care network for somatoform disorders, and its impact on the diagnostic process and treatment recommendations in primary care.

Method

The Network for Somatoform and Functional Disorders (Sofu-Net) was established to connect 41 primary care physicians (PCP), 35 psychotherapists, and 8 mental health clinics. To evaluate Sofu-Net, primary care patients at high risk of having a somatoform disorder were identified using the Patient Health Questionnaire, and were assessed in detail at the patient and PCP level. Discussion of psychosocial distress in the consultations, diagnostic detection rates and treatment recommendations were compared before and 12 months after establishing the network.

Results

Out of the pre- (n = 1645) and 12-months-post Sofu-Net patient samples (n = 1756), 267 (16.2%) and 269 (15.3%) high-risk patients were identified. From these, 156 and 123 patients were interviewed and information was assessed from their PCP. Twelve months after Sofu-Net establishment, high-risk patients more frequently discussed psychosocial distress with their PCP (63.3% vs. 79.2%, p < .001). PCPs prescribed more antidepressants (3.8% vs. 25.2%, p < .001) and less benzodiazepines (21.8% vs. 6.5%, p < .001). Sofu-Net did not affect PCP's diagnostic detection rates or recommendation to initiate psychotherapy.

Conclusion

The study results indicate feasibility of an interdisciplinary network for somatoform disorders. Collaborative care networks for somatoform disorders have the potential to improve doctor–patient-communication and prescription behavior.

Introduction

Somatic symptoms are very common in the general population and are most frequently the reason why patients visit their doctor [1], [2]. Somatoform disorders are characterized by persistent or recurrent disabling bodily complaints without a sufficient organic explanation. These disorders are prevalent in 3.5% to 10% of the general population [3], and in up to 20% of patients in primary care settings [4], [5]. Medically unexplained symptoms and somatoform disorders substantially reduce patients' well-being and quality of life [1], [6]. Moreover, similarly to depressive and anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders are associated with high health care costs caused by frequent consultations, repeated diagnostic procedures and work incapacity [7], [8].

Several important barriers limit the adequate management of somatoform disorders. First, somatoform disorders remain chronically underdiagnosed [9]. Although patients often provide cues to discuss their psychological needs, primary care physicians (PCP) and patients rarely directly discuss psychosocial distress [10]. Critically, such discussion is a key determinant of the recognition of somatoform disorders in primary care. Thus, somatoform disorders are under-recognized and the detection is often limited to very severe cases [11], [12]. The lack of diagnosis could be one explanation for the large intervals between onset and treatment of 6 to 16 years [13], [14]. Other reasons might include the physicians' conservative use of this diagnostic category to avoid stigmatizing patients and overlooking somatic causes, the problematic operationalization of the diagnosis itself, and the patients' reluctance to accept a psychological symptom attribution [15], [16], [17], [18].

Second, although psychotherapy effectively reduces disability and improves functioning [19], [20], [21], only half the patients with somatoform disorders seek any help for their mental problems, and far less, about 11% of patients with current mental disorders have consulted a mental health specialist in the past 12 months [22]. Many patients are neither referred to psychotherapy by their PCPs, nor do they initiate psychotherapy themselves. The shortage of available psychotherapists and long waiting lists add to the problem [22]. Collaborative psychosomatic consultations effectively improve functioning and reduce health care use, but are rarely implemented [23].

Third, due to the ambiguous nature of somatic symptoms and—in many cases—a predominant somatic understanding of illness, patients often visit many medical specialists in search of an underlying somatic cause of their complaints. Together, these barriers result in unnecessary and uncoordinated somatic diagnostic procedures, a lack of adequate treatment, and ultimately, the chronic course of somatoform disorders [24].

According to both international and German guidelines, somatoform disorders should be managed within a collaborative stepped care approach [2], [25], [26]. The PCP should serve as the first contact person as well as the coordinator of adequate diagnostic and treatment procedures. With increasing symptom severity, psychotherapy should be part of the treatment plan. In severe or pain dominant cases, additional time-limited and low-dose antidepressant medication (but no benzodiazepines) is recommended. While there is scarce but promising evidence that collaborative stepped care might improve the management of somatoform disorders [27], [49], these approaches have rarely been implemented and evaluated in practice. This is in contrast to other mental disorders such as depression, for which collaborative care has shown to be more effective than treatment as usual in improving outcomes [28].

To our knowledge, this is the first study that aimed to establish and evaluate a collaborative stepped health care network for somatoform disorders in primary care. The network intends to improve early diagnosis, to accelerate appropriate treatment, thereby reducing unnecessary health care utilization. Since this is the first study to implement such a network in routine primary care, the main focus of this pre–post-intervention study was feasibility [29]. The evaluation focussed on changes in two outcome domains at both the PCP and patient levels, namely (a) the diagnostic process and (b) treatment recommendations. With regard to (a) the diagnostic process, we hypothesized that the discussion of psychosocial distress between patients and PCPs increases after the establishment of the health network, and the correct diagnostic detection rate for somatoform disorders by PCPs increases. With regard to (b) treatment recommendations, we hypothesized that PCPs recommend psychotherapy more often, and prescribe medication more appropriately in terms of less benzodiazepines and more antidepressants.

Section snippets

Study design

With the focus on feasibility, the implementation of the Network for Somatoform and Functional Disorders (Sofu-Net) was evaluated in a pre–post-intervention study [29]. In a within-practice design, the study assessed a consecutive sample of all eligible primary care patients during a pre-selected 2 to 4 day period in each practice before and approximately 12 months after establishing Sofu-Net (Fig. 1). Data was collected between September 2011 and February 2012 pre-, and between September 2012

Feasibility of the network

Sofu-Net was successfully established among the network partners in the Hamburg metropolitan area. Within the 12-month course, all partners continued their participation in the network. Since its start in 2012, the network activities have continued until the date of publication. The regular monitoring phone calls of all network partners generally revealed a satisfactory communication among the partners and successful referral of patients within the network. Occasional problems included the fact

Discussion

This study evaluated the feasibility and first results of a collaborative stepped health care network for somatoform disorders. The successful implementation of the network structure, the high level of ongoing participation, and satisfactory communication among the network partners argue in favor of the feasibility of the network. From the PCPs' perspective, the addressing of psychosocial issued was facilitated and referral to psychotherapy was faster. The PHQ was perceived as both useful and

Financial support

This study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as one subproject of psychenet-Hamburg Network for Mental Health, a large health services research study in the Hamburg Metropolitan Area (subproject Somatoform Disorders; principal investigator: Bernd Löwe, grant number 01KQ1002B).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to report.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Ethics approval was obtained from the Medical Chamber Hamburg, Germany.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating network partners for their engagement with the project. We are grateful to Maria Gladigau, Alexandra Fabisch and Anne Lautenbach for her support of the study. We thank Dr. Alexandra Murray for language editing and her valuable comments on the manuscript.

References (49)

  • C. Sighinolfi et al.

    Collaborative care for depression in European countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J. Psychosom. Res.

    (2014)
  • K. Kroenke et al.

    The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review

    Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • A. Ring et al.

    The somatising effect of clinical consultation: what patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2005)
  • W. Rief et al.

    Evaluation of general practitioners' training: how to manage patients with unexplained physical symptoms

    Psychosomatics

    (2006)
  • C. Nimnuan et al.

    How many functional somatic syndromes?

    J. Psychosom. Res.

    (2001)
  • W. Hiller et al.

    Somatization in the population: from mild bodily misperceptions to disabling symptoms

    Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.

    (2006)
  • C. Hausteiner-Wiehle et al.

    S3- Leitlinie Umgang mit Patienten mit nicht-spezifischen, funktionellen und somatoformen Körperbeschwerden. [Guideline for the treatment of patients with non-specific, functional and somatoform physical complaints]

  • F. Jacobi et al.

    Twelve-month prevalence, comorbidity and correlates of mental disorders in Germany: the mental health module of the German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1-MH)

    Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res.

    (2014)
  • N. Haftgoli et al.

    Patients presenting with somatic complaints in general practice: depression, anxiety and somatoform disorders are frequent and associated with psychosocial stressors

    BMC Fam. Pract.

    (2010)
  • A. Konnopka et al.

    Economics of medically unexplained symptoms: a systematic review of the literature

    Psychother. Psychosom.

    (2012)
  • A.J. Barsky et al.

    Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • P. Salmon et al.

    Voiced but unheard agendas: qualitative analysis of the psychosocial cues that patients with unexplained symptoms present to general practitioners

    Br. J. Gen. Pract.

    (2004)
  • J.W. Warren et al.

    Functional somatic syndromes: sensitivities and specificities of self-reports of physician diagnosis

    Psychosom. Med.

    (2012)
  • P. Henningsen et al.

    Somatization revisited: diagnosis and perceived causes of common mental disorders

    J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (29)

    • General practitioners' views on the diagnostic innovations in DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder - A focus group study

      2019, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      They decide about the extent of a diagnostic workup and initiate appropriate treatment and referral. Stepped, collaborative care models underline the pivotal role of GPs in the guidance through the health care system of patients diagnosed with somatoform disorder [7,8]. We expect that GPs know best whether the diagnostic innovations of SSD would be adequate for general practice.

    • Duration of untreated illness in patients with somatoform disorders

      2018, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Considering the results of Mack et al. (see [1] for methods and results on anxiety and mood disorders; results on somatoform disorders from S. Mack, personal communication, 9 June 2015) that DUI in patients with somatoform disorders is more than twice as long as DUI in patients with anxiety or mood disorders, this seems to particularly be a problem in patients with somatoform disorders. One possible explanation is low correct detection rates of somatoform disorders by primary care physicians, which we also found in the Sofu-Net study [35]. In this context, many barriers to the diagnosis of somatoform disorders have been identified and must be addressed to improve health care for patients with somatoform disorders [19].

    • Predicting suicidal ideation in primary care: An approach to identify easily assessable key variables

      2018, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      For this study, we used cross-sectional data from a broad screening assessment performed in 33 primary care practices located in the metropolitan area of Hamburg, Germany, from 2011 [16] to 2014. Data collection was part of a study evaluating the Network for Somatoform and Functional Disorders (Sofu-Net) [16,17]. Patients were asked to complete a screening questionnaire after providing oral informed consent while waiting for the consultation (no reimbursement was given).

    • Psychiatric aspects of chronic physical disease

      2016, Medicine (United Kingdom)
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent studies demonstrate that cognitive behavioural therapy, behavioural therapy and graded activity with or without antidepressants are the most effective treatments. Overall, it is suggested that a collaborative stepped-care approach led by a physician is important in treatment and care.5 In their daily practice, doctors of any specialty have under their care patients with co-morbid physical and mental illness.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered at the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN55870770).

    View full text