20 years of transcrotal orchidopexy for undescended testis: Results and outcomes
Introduction
The majority of undescended testicles are palpable distal to the inguinal canal [1]. In 1989, Bianchi and Squire [2] proposed that orchidopexy for the palpable undescended testis should commence with a scrotal incision, and that an additional groin incision be reserved for the few high testes that will not otherwise reach the scrotum, after maximal possible mobilization through the scrotum. The ‘Transcrotal Orchidopexy’ has the advantage of much less dissection, greater comfort for the patient, rapid healing, excellent cosmesis and a well maintained testicular position. In 1995, Bianchi and colleagues followed this up with a case series of 367 orchidopexies [3] that confirmed low complication rates and a success rate comparable to the two-incision procedure.
This paper presents the results of a further case record review of transcrotal orchidopexies for the palpable undescended testes performed at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital from 1993 to 2005 by Bianchi and colleagues, which bring the published Manchester experience up to 489 procedures. The authors have also reviewed the literature published over the last 20 years relating to this surgical technique.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The authors retrospectively reviewed the case records of all children who underwent orchidopexy from 1993 to 2005 at Royal Manchester Children's Hospital. The children were under the care of Bianchi and colleagues who carry out the transcrotal approach [2] as the default procedure for all children with a palpable undescended testicle. All patients who underwent primary transcrotal orchidopexy for the treatment of palpable undescended testis were included. Position of the testes was confirmed
Results
A total of 126 orchidopexies were identified for case review within the study period. Exclusion criteria led to four procedures being removed from the study. The remaining group consisted of 118 patients, of whom four had bilateral procedures giving a total of 122 orchidopexies. The age range at first operation was between 10 months and 8 years. Before operation, the position of the testes was the neck of the scrotum in 11 patients (9.0%), the external inguinal ring in 34 (27.9%), the inguinal
Discussion
Conventional orchidopexy today is still performed according to the concepts of Schuller [20] in 1881 and Bevan [21], [22] in 1899 and 1903. The experiences of Bianchi and Squire [2] and Hazebroek et al. [23] confirmed that the testicular vessels and the vas in the majority of palpable undescended testicles, after dissection of the cremaster and the processus vaginalis (Fig. 1), are long enough to allow the testes to reach the scrotum without tension. Based on these observations, the approach
Conclusions
Published data from the last 20 years confirm that transcrotal orchidopexy is followed by uncomplicated healing and a well-placed scrotal testis. In comparison with the conventional two-incision operation, transcrotal orchidopexy offers the advantage of an aesthetic single scrotal crease incision, less dissection and greater comfort for the day-case child. Moreover, the literature suggests that the transcrotal orchidopexy offers at least a comparable recurrence rate to the two-incision approach
Conflict of interests
There are no conflicting interests for any of the authors.
Funding
None.
References (27)
- et al.
Incomplete disappearance of the processus vaginalis as a cause of ascending testes
J Urol
(1997) - et al.
Scrotal fixation: a different surgical approach in the management of the low undescended testes
Urology
(1997) - et al.
Prescrotal orchiopexy: an alternative surgical approach for the palpable undescended testis
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Single scrotal incision orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis
Asian J Surg
(2006) - et al.
Scrotal incision orchiopexy for undescended testes with or without a patent processus vaginalis
J Urol
(2007) - et al.
The low scrotal approach approach to the ectopic or ascended testicle: prevalence of a patent processus vaginalis
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Scrotal incision orchiopexy for undescended testis
Urology
(2004) - et al.
Why luteinizing hormone-releasing nasal spray will not replace orchidopexy in the treatment of boys with undescended testes
J Pediatr Surg
(1987) The results of surgical therapy for cryptorchidism: a literature review and analysis
J Urol
(1995)Urological survey
J Urol
(2009)