Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Single-centre 10-year experience
Introduction
Paediatric urolithiasis is a common clinical problem. Its management requires stone clearance, eradication of urinary infection and treatment of associated metabolic abnormalities. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a well recognized modality for clearance of large renal stones in adults. There is some concern about its use in children due to potential renal damage, radiation exposure and the risks of major complications including fluid and electrolyte imbalance and bleeding. Recent publications attest to the safety of PCNL even in children below a school-going age [1], [2]. We routinely perform PCNL in the paediatric age group and analysed our experience of the last 10 years.
Section snippets
Material and methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of the last 10 years of paediatric patients less than 18 years of age who underwent PCNL at our centre. The indications for PCNL were renal stones greater than 2 cm and smaller stones that failed shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment. All patients underwent metabolic evaluation, including serum calcium, phosphate and uric acid, and 24 h urinary albumin, creatinine, calcium, phosphate and uric acid. Some patients had an extensive metabolic evaluation which
Results
95 paediatric patients underwent 102 PCNLs (7 bilateral) during the 10 year period beginning 2001. During the same period, 192 children underwent shock-wave lithotripsy for renal stones. The mean age of the patients was 11.95 years (range 3–17 years). 13 patients were between 3 and 6 years of age (preschool age group), 36 patients were between 6 and 12 years of age (preadolescent age group). 46 patients were 12–17 years of age (adolescents). Their demographic data and clinical features are
Discussion
Paediatric urolithiasis is a significant health problem, especially in developing countries. The challenge in the management of paediatric urolithiasis is due to greater probability of stone recurrence, metabolic abnormalities and urinary tract infection. These factors make minimally invasive procedures more important in children.
PCNL is the treatment of choice for large, complex, multiple, hard and staghorn renal calculi. It is associated with a lower requirement of auxillary procedures and
Conclusions
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective procedure in children allowing maximal stone clearance with minimal auxillary or repeat procedures. A supracostal approach is valuable in terms of stone clearance, especially in staghorn and complex renal stones, but is associated with a higher rate of chest complications.
Conflict of interest
None.
Funding
None.
References (23)
- et al.
Experience of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using adult-size instruments in children less than 5 years old
J Pediatr Urol
(2009) - et al.
Safety and efficacy of PCNL for management of staghorn calculi in pediatric patients
J Pediatr Urol
(2011) - et al.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool children: experience with a new technique
Urology
(1998) - et al.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution
J Urol
(2007) - et al.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: early and late anatomical and functional results
J Urol
(2004) - et al.
Percutaneous management of renal calculi: experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children
J Urol
(1999) - et al.
Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery
J Urol
(2001) - et al.
Supracostal approach for percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy
Urol Clin North Am
(1990) - et al.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children before school age: experience of a Pakistani centre
BJU Int
(2004) - et al.
Safety and efficacy of a superior caliceal puncture in pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy
J Endourol
(2010)
Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy
Surgery
Cited by (34)
Shockwaves and the Rolling Stones: An Overview of Pediatric Stone Disease
2023, Kidney International ReportsCitation Excerpt :Today, PCNL is the first line treatment modality for Staghorn stones, renal stones >20 mm, lower pole stones >10 mm, cystine, or struvite stones.93 Where there is a residual stone after PCNL, this can be treated by ESWL, “second-look” PCNL and/or uretero-renoscopy.92,94–96 Successful stone clearance in >90% of cases has been reported.82
Efficacy and Safety of Supracostal Access for Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Pediatric Patients
2020, UrologyCitation Excerpt :The most common complications after supracostal PCNL are still grade I complications, which were found in 44/54 patients (81.5%) in our study. Bhageria et al reported 59% grade 1 complications in their series.3 Grade 2 complications were found in 8/54 patients (14.8%) in the present study.
Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital
2017, Journal of Pediatric UrologyCitation Excerpt :There was minimal morbidity. Complication rates for ESWL and PCNL were higher – up to 15% and 24%, respectively [22,23]. Centralisation of specialised treatment and development of a dedicated paediatric stone team has proven to be a successful model in achieving these results.
Clinical effectiveness in the diagnosis and acute management of pediatric nephrolithiasis
2016, International Journal of SurgeryPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children: 17 Years of Experience
2016, Journal of Urology