Elsevier

Journal of Pediatric Urology

Volume 13, Issue 4, August 2017, Pages 374.e1-374.e8
Journal of Pediatric Urology

The impact of a bladder training video versus standard urotherapy on quality of life of children with bladder and bowel dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.06.005Get rights and content

Summary

Introduction

Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) can negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of children. Urotherapy is an accepted treatment option for BBD; however, literature that examines the impact of management options on QoL in this population is scarce.

Objective

To determine whether a bladder training video (BTV) is non-inferior to standard urotherapy (SU) in improving QoL in children with BBD.

Methods

Children aged 5–10 years and who scored ≥11 on the Vancouver Non-Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction/Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome Questionnaire (NLUTD/DES) were recruited from a pediatric tertiary care center. Children were excluded with known vesicoureteral reflux; spinal dysraphism; learning disabilities; recent urotherapy; and primary nocturnal enuresis. Quality of life was evaluated using the Pediatric Incontinence Quality-of-Life questionnaire (PinQ). Questionnaires were administered at the baseline and 3-month follow-up clinic visits. Following centralized electronic blocked randomization schemes to guarantee allocation concealment, patients were assigned to receive SU or BTV during their regular clinic visits. An intention-to-treat protocol was followed. Between-group baseline and follow-up QoL scores were compared using paired and unpaired t-tests, and linear regression analysis.

Results

Of the 539 BBD patients who were screened, 173 (32%) were eligible, and 150 (87%) were randomized. Of these, 143 (96%) completed the study, five (3%) were lost to follow-up, and two (1%) withdrew. In total, 140/143 (97%) completed the QoL questionnaire at baseline and follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 3.5 ± 1.1 months for BTV patients and 3.7 ± 1.6 months for SU. At baseline, BTV and SU patients had a mean QoL score of 26.6 ± 13 and 23.8 ± 12, respectively (P = 0.17). Between-group mean change in PinQ scores from baseline was not statistically significant (BTV: 6.25 ± 12.5 vs SU: 3.75 ± 12.2; P = 0.23; Summary Fig.). Significant predictors of positive change in QoL were: higher symptomatology score, with a correlation coefficient of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.2–0.9; P = 0.003), and worse baseline QoL score, with a correlation coefficient of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.4–0.7; P < 0.001). Overall, most patients had improved symptomatology and QoL scores.

Conclusion

Significant and similar QoL changes from baseline to follow-up were observed in both the BTV and SU groups, suggesting that BTV was non-inferior to SU in improving QoL in children with BBD. Quality of life assessment should be considered when evaluating interventions for BBD, as it appears to be an important clinical outcome with which to determine urotherapy success.

Summary Figure
  1. Download : Download high-res image (89KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Summary Figure. Box plots of change in quality of life by treatment modality.

Introduction

Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is one of the most common conditions seen in pediatric urology outpatient clinics, accounting for >40% of referrals [1], [2]. Bladder and bowel dysfunction represents a heterogeneous condition encompassing both lower urinary tract and bowel disturbances [3], triggering symptoms that can negatively affect a child's quality of life (QoL) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. While standard urotherapy (SU) is considered to be the primary treatment for BBD, the downside of this intervention is that it often requires repeated and lengthy clinic visits [3], [10]. Standard urotherapy primarily consists of educational strategies provided to families, and includes information regarding normal lower urinary tract function, instruction on bladder training and healthy bladder and bowel habits, documentation of symptoms with diaries, and support and encouragement [3]. However, there is a clear need for alternative management options, which should be evaluated against this benchmark, that employ meaningful clinical outcomes.

The present paper reports on the secondary outcome of quality of life (QoL) as part of the bladder training video (BTV) trial, which sought to evaluate an animated BTV compared to standard individual urotherapy (SU) [11]. In the first paper, it was concluded that BTV was not inferior to SU in reducing bladder/bowel symptoms in children aged 5–10 years, and such an educational tool may be an alternative modality to deliver conservative-based urotherapy consistent with the International Children's Continence Society terminology [3], [11].

Measurement of quality of life (QoL) provides a holistic assessment from the child's perspective of the impact that BBD has on their daily life [12], [13]. Quality of life is recognized as an important health outcome measure in clinical practice and pediatric studies [7], [14], [15], [16], [17]. In addition to having a negative effect on self-esteem, family and peer relationships, BBD has been shown to be a source of shame and embarrassment for children [5], [9]. Despite the recognized need to measure QoL in children with BBD, this variable is not routinely captured. A survey of pediatric continence experts found that 94% of respondents identified a need for routine QoL assessments in children with BBD; however, this was carried out less than one quarter of the time [15]. Indeed, one of the main reasons to devote resources and time to address BBD is to improve QoL and minimize adverse impacts on self-esteem and family life. When a change to SU modality is considered, it is proposed that QoL be considered as an important outcome measure to ensure that the newly proposed modality is comparable to the established norm.

It is believed that the value of an animated educational video on the QoL of children with BBD has not been previously studied. This represents an interesting, novel and theoretically cost-effective intervention for BBD management. Therefore, as part of the BTV trial, the impact of a 7-min animated BTV versus SU on QoL was evaluated in school-aged children with BBD. The hypothesis was that BTV would be similar in improving QoL compared to SU, and that an improved quality of life score would correlate with a lower BBD symptomatology score.

Section snippets

Design

This study was conducted as a post-hoc analysis of a secondary outcome in the setting of a non-inferiority randomized trial. The study design and methods have been previously reported in detail [11] and the trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01915004). The primary outcome of the trial was to determine the non-inferiority of BTV in improving symptomatology scores. Changes in QoL were measured as a secondary outcome. The present paper is an extension of the BTV trial [11], and

Results

A total 75 patients were randomized in each arm (BTV and SU), with similar baseline characteristics (Table 1). A total of 140 patients (BTV = 72; SU = 68) completed baseline and follow-up QoL measures, and were included in the final analyses. Two (1%) patients withdrew from the study and five (3%) were lost to follow-up. The mean initial QoL scores were 26.6 ± 13 for BTV and 23.8 ± 12 for SU patients (P = 0.17). The 3-month follow-up mean QoL scores were 20.3 ± 14.7 for BTV and 20 ± 13.4 for SU

Discussion

When evaluating the success of a medical intervention, traditional clinical measures – such as improvement or symptom resolution, mortality and morbidity – are often considered. Assessing QoL complements these established outcomes, becoming essential and expected when comparing treatment modalities that can interfere with patients' wellbeing [15]. It is well established that BBD negatively impacts the QoL of children [4], [8], [9], [12], [19], [20]. This negative impact is similar to other

Conclusion

Urotherapy has a favorable impact on symptoms and QoL in children with BBD. In the setting of a randomized controlled trial, BTV was not inferior to SU in improving QoL scores in children with BBD, and can thus be considered an efficient modality to deliver urotherapy. It is proposed that QoL assessment with a continence-specific tool such as the PinQ should be considered as a key element with which to evaluate urotherapy success along with other more traditional clinical outcomes.

Disclosure

This study was funded $60,000 by the Canadian Urological Association Pfizer Incontinence fellowship.

References (22)

  • W.F. Bower

    Self-reported effect of childhood incontinence on quality of life

    J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs

    (2008)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Effect of education given to children with enuresis on quality of life

      2021, Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Equit et al. (2014) concluded that children who successfully responded to enuresis treatment achieved a significant improvement in their quality of life [11]. Also, some studies found that training using bladder training videos and standard urotherapy were effective in reducing symptoms and improving quality of life [31,32]. In the study, it was found that the quality of life of children with enuresis is lower at baseline.

    • Integrative review and evaluation of quality of life related instruments in pediatric urology

      2021, Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The initial query of electronic databases and hand searching yielded 5377 unique articles, 101 of which were identified for full-text screening after title and abstract review. Of these, 43 studies were included for data abstraction and 22 unique instruments were identified [9–22, 23–35, 36–55] (PRISMA diagram in Appendix B). Children's median age was 11 years old (IQR 8.3–13.1, mean: 10.5, SD 3.1).

    • Does a serious game increase intrinsic motivation in children receiving urotherapy?

      2019, Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A positive treatment outcome is associated with improvement of QoL in all different types of incontinence [4]. Therefore, improved QoL is an important treatment outcome after a child has successfully completed urotherapy [5]. For children suffering from functional DUI, urotherapy is considered the treatment of choice.

    • Urotherapy in the treatment of children and adolescents with bladder and bowel dysfunction: a systematic review

      2019, Jornal de Pediatria
      Citation Excerpt :

      One study compared standard urotherapy with standard urotherapy + anticholinergic therapy.26 Three articles compared standard urotherapy with a traditional approach (individual dialog consultation) with alternative techniques for urotherapy application (video animation and group approach).10,27,28 One article compared symptom reduction in children who received urotherapy shortly after the diagnosis with those who received therapy three months after the diagnosis29 and one article analyzed response to urotherapy at each child's appointment, as well as the percentage of adherence to the return consultations according to the number of visits.30

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text