“When ablation goes wrong”- urethral strictures after ablation of posterior urethral valves-characteristics, management and outcomes”
Introduction
Posterior urethral valves (PUV) are the most common cause of congenital bladder outlet obstruction in boys with an estimated incidence ranging from 1 in 2000 to 1 in 25,000 live births [1]. With improvement in miniaturization of instruments in urology, transurethral fulguration of PUV has become the most widely accepted and practiced technique of valve ablation all over the world. Urethral strictures are a rare but serious complication of PUV fulguration with incidence ranging from 25% by Myers and Walkers in 1981 to 0% in series by Nijman et al. [2,3]. However, the true rate of strictures is difficult to define due to a lack of series with long-term follow up. Presentation is likely with poor flow, urinary tract infection or rarely acute retention. Sometimes these patients present with concomitant bladder neck contracture when the fulguration has been combined with bladder neck incision. Due to rarity of theses strictures, there is also not much literature on the characteristics of these strictures, how these post fulguration strictures should be treated, which modality of management (open or endoscopic) can be used for these strictures and whether the success of theses modalities is similar to strictures of other etiologies. Though a proper technique of fulguration with a proper sized resectoscope is the best way to prevent such strictures theses stricture continue to happen because of the unavailability of proper pediatric instruments and lack of expertise while dealing with the fragile pediatric urethra. Urethral stricture is a debilitating condition because, if not managed properly, it can lead to severe impairment of quality of life by affecting continence and potency. In this regard, to define further the treatment of post-fulguration strictures, we recently reviewed 13 such cases which were treated in our tertiary center over a period of 16 years.
Our study pertains to the presentation of these rare urethral strictures following valve ablation, distribution of anatomical site, their management by endoscopic and open techniques and analysis of the results.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
After obtaining an institutional review board approval, operative logs from the previous 16 years from January 2000 to July 2017 were reviewed and all children and adolescents ≤18 years old who had undergone management for stricture urethral disease in our tertiary center and had at least 1 year of eligible follow-up data were identified. Operative reports and office charts were then used to identify the subset of patients who developed urethral strictures following PUV ablation. In patients
Results
During the study period, we had treated 199 patients of pediatric urethral strictures at our center, among whom we identified 13 boys with strictures following valve fulguration who had a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Of these 5 were following “in house” fulgurations while 8 were referred from outside for management of stricture following fulguration. Though three out of thirteen boys had a history of urethral catherization, none had a stricture diagnosed before valve fulguration.
Discussion
In the present study, we retrospectively reviewed 13 children who had valve-ablation related strictures and were managed by endoscopic or open surgery over a period of 17 years. Those undergoing endoscopic management in general, had short segment and pliable strictures while those undergoing open surgery mostly had complicated strictures. The success rate of endoscopic procedure compared to open surgery as the primary procedure were superior, though this was mainly due to the difference in case
Conclusions
To conclude, the possibility of urethral stricture though rare, should always be kept in mind as a possibility while dealing with symptoms post-ablation in cases of PUV. As with strictures of other etiologies, primary endoscopic management give good results for focal, proximal bulbar strictures with open intervention reserved for longer segment, near obliterative strictures and in those failing endoscopic measures. Proper patient selection for each modality is crucial to give best outcomes.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgement
None
References (11)
Urethral strictures following transurethral resection of posterior urethral valves
J Urol
(1982)- et al.
The operative management of posterior urethral valves
J Pediatr Surg
(1987) - et al.
Urethral strictures after fulguration of posterior urethral valves
J Pediatr Surg
(1998) - et al.
Surgical complications of posterior urethral valve ablation:20 years' experience
J Pediatr Surg
(2010) - et al.
Residual valve and stricture after posterior urethral valve ablation: how to evaluate?
J Pediatr Urol
(2013)