Using self-esteem instability to disentangle the connection between self-esteem level and perceived aggression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.01.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Stable high self-esteem was associated with low levels of perceived aggression.

  • Unstable high self-esteem was associated with high levels of perceived aggression.

  • Low levels of self-esteem were associated with perceived aggression.

Abstract

Recent debate has considered the connection between self-esteem and aggression. The present study attempted to clarify this association by examining the possibility that self-esteem instability moderates the association that self-esteem level has with aggression. Perceived aggression was measured in 234 (34 men and 200 women) undergraduate participants. These participants were then evaluated by 1078 friends and family members. Self-esteem instability was found to moderate the association between self-esteem level and aggression such that individuals with stable high self-esteem were viewed as being less aggressive than those with unstable high self-esteem or low self-esteem (regardless of whether their low self-esteem was stable or unstable). These findings are discussed in the context of understanding the connection between self-esteem and aggression.

Introduction

Recent debate has focused on the connection that self-esteem has with aggression. A popular view is that low self-esteem may sometimes cause aggression (e.g., Donnellan, Trzesniewski, Robins, Moffitt, & Caspi, 2005). Although low self-esteem has been shown to be associated with a variety of externalizing behaviors and delinquency (e.g., Baumeister et al., 2003, Trzesniewski et al., 2006), there are actually very few studies that provide direct support for the idea that low self-esteem contributes to aggression per se (see Baumeister, Bushman, & Campbell, 2000 for an extended discussion of this issue). Among the studies that are consistent with the idea that low self-esteem is linked with aggression are a longitudinal field study showing that children with low levels of self-esteem reported getting into a relatively large number of fights and a study showing that college students with low levels of self-esteem reported relatively high levels of trait aggression (Donnellan et al., 2005). Although these studies found support for the connection between low self-esteem and aggression, similar results have failed to emerge from other studies (e.g., Bushman et al., 2009). Taken together, these studies suggest that even though low self-esteem is clearly associated with a range of negative behaviors including various externalizing behaviors and delinquency, the connection between low self-esteem and aggression is, at best, weak and inconsistent.

A rival hypothesis to the idea that low self-esteem causes aggression is that high levels of self-esteem lead to aggressive behavior (e.g., Baumeister et al., 1996, Baumeister et al., 2000, Bushman and Baumeister, 1998, Bushman et al., 2009). It is important to note that this competing view does not suggest that the possession of high self-esteem is a simple and direct cause of aggression. Rather, the contention is that individuals with high levels of self-esteem are at greater risk for behaving in an aggressive manner if they believe that their feelings of self-worth have been threatened in some way. According to this view, aggressive behavior is considered to be a means by which individuals holding highly favorable – but easily threatened – views of themselves may protect their feelings of self-worth from potential threats. Support for this argument has been found in a number of laboratory studies in which individuals with high levels of self-esteem and/or narcissistic personality features were exposed to various self-esteem threats (e.g., receiving negative feedback on an essay) and responded aggressively to these threats (e.g., blasting a fellow participant with an aversive noise; see Bushman et al., 2009 for a review).

We believe that much of the confusion concerning the link between self-esteem and aggression may be due, at least in part, to researchers focusing on self-esteem level (i.e., whether self-esteem is low or high) without giving adequate attention to other aspects of self-esteem such as its temporal stability (i.e., fluctuations in moment-to-moment feelings of self-worth over time; see Kernis, 2005 for a review). Self-esteem instability is typically operationalized as the magnitude of change in state self-esteem across repeated measurements. The inclusion of self-esteem instability is important because high self-esteem has been shown to be a heterogeneous construct consisting of both a stable and unstable form (see Jordan & Zeigler-Hill, 2013 for a review). Stable high self-esteem reflects positive attitudes toward the self that are realistic, well-anchored, and resistant to threat. Individuals with stable high self-esteem are believed to have a solid foundation for their feelings of self-worth that does not require constant validation from others. In contrast, unstable high self-esteem refers to feelings of self-worth that are vulnerable to challenge, require constant validation, and rely upon some degree of self-deception. Individuals with unstable high self-esteem are believed to be preoccupied with protecting and enhancing their vulnerable feelings of self-worth. Much of the previous research concerning self-esteem instability has shown that it – in conjunction with self-esteem level – predicts a variety of important outcomes including defensiveness (Kernis, Lakey, & Heppner, 2008), psychological adjustment (Zeigler-Hill & Wallace, 2012), and interpersonal style (Zeigler-Hill, Clark, & Beckman, 2011). These studies suggest that the self-regard of those with unstable high self-esteem is constantly at risk which leads to heightened reactivity and defensiveness among these individuals.

Previous research has begun to examine the possibility that individuals with unstable high self-esteem will be particularly aggressive. The earliest of these studies found that individuals with unstable high self-esteem reported the highest levels of anger and hostility (Kernis, Grannemann, & Barclay, 1989). Although these results did not directly address aggression, the finding that individuals with unstable high self-esteem reported the highest levels of anger and hostility are certainly consistent with the idea that these individuals may also be highly aggressive. More recent studies have directly examined the connection between unstable high self-esteem and self-reported aggression (Webster et al., 2007, Zeigler-Hill and Wallace, 2012). The results of these studies showed that individuals with unstable high self-esteem reported being more aggressive than those with stable high self-esteem. It is important to note that sex sometimes further moderated these results such that women with unstable high self-esteem were found to possess relatively low levels of aggression in two of the three studies reported by Webster et al. (2007) and men with unstable low self-esteem possessed the highest levels of physical aggression in one study reported by Zeigler-Hill and Wallace (2012). These results may shed important light on the connection between self-esteem and aggression because they show that individuals with unstable high self-esteem often report higher levels of aggression than those with stable high self-esteem. However, it is important to note that individuals with low levels of self-esteem often reported levels of aggression that were similar to those reported by individuals with unstable high self-esteem. Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that individuals with stable high self-esteem tend to report being less aggressive than those with either unstable high self-esteem or low levels of self-esteem (regardless of whether their low self-esteem is stable or unstable). This is important because it suggests that the continuing debate concerning whether low self-esteem or high self-esteem is associated with aggression may be persisting because both sides are partially correct. It may be necessary to account for self-esteem instability in order to gain a clearer understanding of the true connection between self-esteem level and aggression.

The purpose of the present study was to gain a more nuanced understanding of the connection between self-esteem and aggression by using self-esteem instability to distinguish between individuals with stable high self-esteem and those with unstable high self-esteem. This was accomplished by asking participants to complete a measure of self-esteem level as well as repeated measures of state self-esteem each day for up to seven consecutive days which were used to generate an index of self-esteem instability. Then, participants were asked to recruit up to five friends or family members who were asked to rate the participants in terms of their aggression. Thus, the present study was an attempt to improve our understanding of the connection between self-esteem and aggression by examining whether self-esteem instability moderated the association between self-esteem level and perceived aggression. Utilizing perceiver reports of aggression is an important extension of previous studies that relied on self-reported aggression because it is possible that the low levels of aggression reported by those with secure high self-esteem may have been due, at least in part, to socially desirable response tendencies. At the most basic level, we expected our results to replicate those of previous studies showing that self-esteem level had either no relationship or a relatively weak negative relationship with aggression. More importantly, we expected that any main effect of self-esteem level would be qualified by its interaction with self-esteem instability. Consistent with previous results concerning self-reported aggression (e.g., Zeigler-Hill & Wallace, 2012), we expected that individuals with stable high self-esteem would be perceived by others as being less aggressive than those with unstable high self-esteem or low levels of self-esteem (regardless of whether their low self-esteem was stable or unstable).

Section snippets

Participants and procedure

Participants were 357 undergraduates at a university in the southern region of the United States enrolled in psychology courses who participated in return for partial fulfillment of a research participation requirement. Participants completed measures of self-esteem level – along with other measures that are not relevant to the present study (e.g., Big Five personality dimensions) – via a secure website. Following the completion of those questionnaires, participants were offered additional

Results

The means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations for all variables are presented in Table 1. These correlations revealed that self-esteem level was not associated with self-esteem instability even though previous studies have consistently found them to have a modest negative association (e.g., Zeigler-Hill & Wallace, 2012). The reason for this inconsistency is that we used the corrected standard deviation as our indicator of self-esteem instability which removes the influence of the

Discussion

The purpose of the present study was to examine whether self-esteem level and self-esteem instability had unique associations with perceived aggression and whether the combination of self-esteem level and self-esteem instability predicted perceived aggression. The interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem instability emerged which is important because it suggests that the association that self-esteem level has with aggression – at least perceived aggression – is moderated by self-esteem

Conclusion

The findings of the present study suggest that the combination of self-esteem level and self-esteem instability is associated with perceived aggression. More specifically, individuals with stable high self-esteem were viewed as less aggressive by their friends and family members than were those with unstable high self-esteem or low self-esteem. These results extend our understanding of the link between self-esteem and aggression by showing that self-esteem instability moderates the association

References (24)

  • B.M. Baird et al.

    On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2006)
  • R.F. Baumeister et al.

    Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism?

    Current Directions in Psychological Science

    (2000)
  • R.F. Baumeister et al.

    Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?

    Psychological Science in the Public Interest

    (2003)
  • R.F. Baumeister et al.

    Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem

    Psychological Review

    (1996)
  • A.S. Bryk et al.

    HLM for Windows 4.03

    (1998)
  • A.S. Bryk et al.

    Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods

    (1992)
  • B.J. Bushman et al.

    Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1998)
  • B.J. Bushman et al.

    Looking again, and harder, for a link between low self-esteem and aggression

    Journal of Personality

    (2009)
  • P.J. Curran et al.

    Testing and probing within-level and between-level interactions in hierarchical linear models

  • M.B. Donnellan et al.

    Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency

    Psychological Science

    (2005)
  • C.H. Jordan et al.

    Fragile self-esteem: The perils and pitfalls of (some) high self-esteem

  • M.H. Kernis

    Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning

    Journal of Personality

    (2005)
  • Cited by (25)

    • The stability of self-esteem variability: A real-time assessment

      2019, Journal of Research in Personality
      Citation Excerpt :

      This perspective “negates the true ontological nature of self-esteem as a process in and of itself“ (De Ruiter et al., 2017, p. 51) and eliminates the (within-individual) variability of SSE measures. This shortcoming also holds true for the use of the corrected standard deviation (e.g., Zeigler-Hill, Enjaian, Holden, & Southard, 2014), defined as regression residual (Baird, Le, & Lucas, 2006). To track the dynamic pattern of SSE responsivity to the environment or to individual experience requires a context-sensitive analytic strategy that depicts the true change of SSE across occasions of measurement (Steyer, Partchev, & Shanahan, 2000).

    • Self-esteem and envy: Is state self-esteem instability associated with the benign and malicious forms of envy?

      2018, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is important to note that state self-esteem instability may also play a role in distinguishing between different forms of low self-esteem (i.e., stable low self-esteem vs. unstable low self-esteem; e.g., Zeigler-Hill & Wallace, 2012) but these effects have been less consistent across studies (e.g., Kernis, Lakey, & Heppner, 2008). Previous research has shown that state self-esteem instability – either alone or in conjunction with trait self-esteem level – predicts a wide variety of important outcomes including defensiveness (Kernis et al., 2008), anger and hostility (Kernis et al., 1989), aggression (Zeigler-Hill, Enjaian, Holden, & Southard, 2014), and psychological adjustment (Zeigler-Hill & Wallace, 2012). Taken together, these studies have allowed for a more nuanced understanding of self-esteem by showing that individuals with unstable high self-esteem seem to view their feelings of self-worth as being constantly at risk which likely contributes to their increased reactivity to potential threats.

    • Can Rosenberg's (1965) Stability of Self Scale capture within-person self-esteem variability? Meta-analytic validity and test–retest reliability

      2017, Journal of Research in Personality
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several researchers have adopted Kernis and colleagues’ approach to measuring state self-esteem (e.g., Nezlek & Gable, 2001; Nezlek & Plesko, 2001; Webster & Kirkpatrick, 2006) and its instability with an SD over time (e.g., Foster, Kernis, & Goldman, 2007; Gable & Nezlek, 1998; Greenier et al., 1999; Rhodewalt, Madrian, & Cheney, 1998; Seary, Blascovich, & Vick, 2004; Webster, Kirkpatrick, Nezlek, Smith, & Paddock, 2007; Zeigler-Hill, 2006). Although other researchers have shown other—and arguably better—ways to measure within-person variability (Baird, Le, & Lucas, 2006; Geiser et al., 2015; Nezlek, 2012), these often correlate highly with the traditional SD-based temporal approach and produce similar results (Zeigler-Hill, Enjaian, Holden, & Southard, 2014). The temporal SD approach likely remains popular because it is intuitive and easy to use.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text