Original paper
Negative effect of static stretching restored when combined with a sport specific warm-up component

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2008.04.004Get rights and content

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that static stretching may inhibit performance in strength and power activities. However, most of this research has involved stretching routines dissimilar to those practiced by athletes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the decline in performance normally associated with static stretching pervades when the static stretching is conducted prior to a sport specific warm-up. Thirteen netball players completed two experimental warm-up conditions. Day 1 warm-up involved a submaximal run followed by 15 min of static stretching and a netball specific skill warm-up. Day 2 followed the same design; however, the static stretching was replaced with a 15 min dynamic warm-up routine to allow for a direct comparison between the static stretching and dynamic warm-up effects. Participants performed a countermovement vertical jump and 20 m sprint after the first warm-up intervention (static or dynamic) and also after the netball specific skill warm-up. The static stretching condition resulted in significantly worse performance than the dynamic warm-up in vertical jump height (−4.2%, 0.40 ES) and 20 m sprint time (1.4%, 0.34 ES) (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in either performance variable were evident when the skill-based warm-up was preceded by static stretching or a dynamic warm-up routine. This suggests that the practice of a subsequent high-intensity skill based warm-up restored the differences between the two warm-up interventions. Hence, if static stretching is to be included in the warm-up period, it is recommended that a period of high-intensity sport-specific skills based activity is included prior to the on-court/field performance.

Introduction

The purpose of the pre-competition warm-up is to prepare athletes for the demands of the competition. A well-designed warm-up can assist the athlete in mentally focusing on the upcoming task and to bring about various physiological changes to optimise performance.1 A pre-game warm-up for team sports typically includes a period of sub maximal running, static stretching of the major muscle groups and sport specific movements incorporating various range of motion (ROM) exercises with skill-based drills executed at, or just below game intensity.2

Low to moderate intensity aerobic activity is an important element of the warm-up as it increases muscle temperature, which is directly responsible for a number of mechanisms important for short term performance, including range of movement about the joints, increased rate of nerve impulses, and an altered force–velocity relationship.3 In contrast, the static stretching component, which is routinely practiced in team sports, has little scientific basis to support a beneficial effect on sports performance. In fact, substantial evidence exists that static stretching may acutely inhibit performance in strength and power activities, with previous research reporting negative effects on maximal isometric force,4, 5 one repetition maximum strength6 and explosive performance as measured by a countermovement vertical jump,7, 8 drop-jumps7, 8, 9 and 20 m sprint performance.10, 11 Acute bouts of stretching have also been shown to impair balance, reaction time and movement time.12 The lack of evidence in favour of static stretching during a warm-up has led some authors to recommend the exclusion of this component from the warm-up for strength and power activities.13, 14

Awareness of the substantial evidence suggesting acute impairment of strength and power following static stretching has led to some coaches combining and/or replacing static stretching with dynamic warm-up routines. McMillian et al.15 found that a dynamic stretching routine produced higher (2.8%, ES 0.24) scores for a five-step jump than when static stretching was utilised. Similarly, dynamic stretching produced faster (2.8%, ES 0.51) 20 m sprint performance10 and greater (11.56%, ES 2.23) leg extension power16 than static stretching. Such evidence suggests that dynamic warm-up routines have a greater beneficial effect on powerful-based performances than static stretching routines. However, an important component of the warm-up sequence that has generally been overlooked in the literature to date is the sport specific warm-up activities that are commonly included in many team sport warm-up routines. Only Young and Behm7 have investigated the effect of specific rehearsal of the test activity subsequent to a bout of static stretching. They examined the influence of practice jumps in combination with a 4 min submaximal run and static stretching and reported better performance for a variety of jump variables when the subjects were given opportunity to perform practice jumps. The authors suggested that rehearsal of the skill to be performed may have had an effect of “opening up” the specific neural pathways, facilitating motor unit activation, and therefore assisting to improve explosive performance.7 In addition to these findings, Young and Behm7 also reported that a run + stretch condition produced very similar mean results to their control condition, leading them to believe that perhaps the run + stretch condition might be made up of a positive influence (run) and a negative influence (stretch), which counteracted each other to produce results similar to the control condition. While their study design did not include an additional warm-up condition to examine the effect of a warm-up consisting of only two positive influences, for example the run + skill rehearsal, they hypothesised such a warm-up routine may be the most beneficial combination of activities.

Therefore, the purpose of the current research was to replicate current warm-up practice in netball to evaluate differences in speed and leg extensor power after static stretching and dynamic warm-up routines. A further objective was to determine if differences in performance remained after a period of moderate to high intensity skill rehearsal. That is, we were interested in investigating if the hypothesised negative effect of stretching would remain after a sport specific warm-up sequence.

Section snippets

Methods

Thirteen players from the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) Netball program (mean ± standard deviations (S.D.) age, height, and mass of 19.6 ± 0.8 years, 184.8 ± 6.3 cm and 75.2 ± 10.3 kg, respectively) participated in this study. All players received a clear explanation of the study, including the risks and benefits of participation. Testing was in accordance with and approved by institutional ethics, and written consent for testing was obtained in the player's scholarship holder's agreement.

Although

Results

Descriptive statistics for the performance variables in each warm-up condition are presented in Table 2. As hypothesised, the static stretching condition resulted in significantly worse performance than the dynamic warm-up in vertical jump height (−4.2%, 0.40 ES) and 20 m sprint time (1.4%, 0.34 ES) (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). The VJ and sprint performance in the static stretching condition were improved after the SKILL component was performed (5.3% and 0.9%, respectively). No significant differences were

Discussion

While many researchers have shown that static stretching can inhibit strength and power performance, they have tended to use stretching protocols that do not replicate current practice in preparation for dynamic sports performance, generally using stretching protocols with extensive time under tension per muscle group, or using static stretching in isolation. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance effect of static stretching that is undertaken as a component of a typical

Conclusions

Although the need for a warm-up before high intensity performance is rarely questioned, the precise protocol leading to optimum performance is not well established.2 The most important findings from this study were that a dynamic warm-up routine is superior to static stretching when preparing for powerful performance; however, these differences can be eliminated if followed by a moderate to high intensity sport specific skill warm-up.

Practical implications

  • If static stretching is included in place of, or in addition to a dynamic warm-up routine, it should be followed by a period of moderate to high intensity sport specific activity that includes some form of skill rehearsal.

  • A dynamic warm-up routine is superior to static stretching when preparing for powerful performance.

References (21)

  • M. Stewart et al.

    Warm-up or stretch as preparation for sprint performance?

    J Sci Med Sport

    (2007)
  • J. Swanson

    A functional approach to warm-up and flexibility

    Strength Cond J

    (2006)
  • W. Young et al.

    Should static stretching be used during a warm-up for strength and power activities?

    Strength Cond J

    (2002)
  • D. Bishop

    Warm up. II. Performance changes following active warm-up and how to structure the warm-up

    Sports Med

    (2003)
  • J. Fowles et al.

    Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantar flexors

    J Appl Physiol

    (2000)
  • K. Power et al.

    An acute bout of static stretching: effects on force and jumping performance

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2004)
  • J. Kokkonen et al.

    Acute muscle stretching inhibits maximal strength performance

    Res Q Exerc Sport

    (1998)
  • W. Young et al.

    Effects of running, static stretching and practice jumps on explosive force production and jumping performance

    J Sports Med Phys Fit

    (2003)
  • D. Behm et al.

    Flexibility is not related to stretch-induced deficits in force or power

    J Sports Sci Med

    (2006)
  • W. Young et al.

    Effects of static stretching volume and intensity on plantar flexor explosive force production and range of motion

    J Sports Med Phys Fit

    (2006)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text