Review
Does plyometric training improve strength performance? A meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2009.08.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Majority of the research suggests plyometric training (PT) improves maximal strength performance as measured by 1RM, isometric MVC or slow velocity isokinetic testing. However, the effectiveness of PT depends upon various factors. A meta-analysis of 15 studies with a total of 31 effect sizes (ES) was carried out to analyse the role of various factors on the effects of PT on strength performance. The inclusion criteria for the analysis were: (a) studies using PT programs for lower limb muscles; (b) studies employing true experimental design and valid and reliable measurements; (c) studies including sufficient data to calculate ES. When subjects can adequately follow plyometric exercises, the training gains are independent of fitness level. Subjects in either good or poor physical condition, benefit equally from plyometric work, also men obtain similar strength results to women following PT. In relation to the variables of program design, training volume of less than 10 weeks and with more than 15 sessions, as well as the implementation of high-intensity programs, with more than 40 jumps per session, were the strategies that seem to maximize the probability to obtain significantly greater improvements in performance (p < 0.05). In order to optimise strength enhancement, the combination of different types of plyometrics with weight-training would be recommended, rather than utilizing only one form (p < 0.05). The responses identified in this analysis are essential and should be considered by the strength and conditioning professional with regard to the most appropriate dose–response trends for PT to optimise strength gains.

Introduction

Muscular strength and power are considered as critical elements for a successful athletic performance, as well as for carrying out daily activities and occupational tasks.1, 2 Much research has been focused on the development of maximal strength performance as this neuromuscular quality appears to underpin most other domains of human physical capacity. Although various training methods, including weight-training,3, 4 explosive and ballistic-type resistance training methods,5 electrostimulation training,6, 7 and vibration training8 have been effectively used for the enhancement of strength performance, there is solid research evidence that plyometric training (PT) is also effective for improving ballistic and maximal strength.9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Plyometrics refers to exercises that are designed to enhance neuromuscular performance. For the lower body this involves application of jump, hopping and bounding training. Plyometric exercises constitute a natural part of most sport movements as they involve jumping, hopping and skipping (i.e., such as high jumping, throwing or kicking).14, 15, 16 Plyometric exercises are implemented in various forms depending on the purpose of the training program. Typical plyometric exercises include the countermovement jump (CMJ), the drop jump (DJ) and the squat jump (SJ). These exercises can either be combined within a training program or can be applied independently. Furthermore, plyometrics can be performed at various intensity levels, ranging from low-intensity double-leg hops to high-intensity unilateral drills. As far as the lower body is concerned, plyometrics includes the performance of various types of body-weight jumping exercises, such as DJ, CMJ, alternate-leg bounding, hopping, and other stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) exercises.17, 18, 19, 20 These exercises are characterised by SSC actions, that is, they start with a rapid stretch of a muscle (eccentric phase) and are followed immediately by a rapid shortening of the same muscle (concentric phase).17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

Research indicates PT improves strength, power output, coordination, and athletic performance.24, 25, 26, 27, 28 Numerous studies on PT have demonstrated improvements in maximal strength,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 29 ranging from 11 kg to 60 kg (performing exercises such as DJ, CMJ, SJ, combined jumps or combined weights and plyometric training) that could be attributed to the enhanced coordination and the individual's ability to rapidly increase muscle tension resulting in greater maximal rate of force development (RFD).11, 37 In addition, a number of authors determined24, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 significant positive effects of PT on maximal strength when compared with other training modalities (i.e., weight-training, eccentric training, isometric training). However, several authors have shown that for optimising maximal strength enhancement, the combination of training modalities (i.e., plyometrics and high-intensity resistance training) is recommended rather than using only a single modality.9, 12, 16 However, the characteristics of a training program that achieves better gains are not clear.

The effects of PT may differ depending on the various subject characteristics, such as training level,36, 37, 38 gender,39 age,40, 41, 42 sport activity or familiarity with plyometric training.11, 29 Research studies that combine these variables in different ways sometimes lead to conflicting results.7, 12, 43 Other factors that seem to determine the effectiveness of PT are program duration and training volume. Research studies have used numerous combinations of duration, intensity and volume characteristics4, 10, 12, 13, 44, 45 therefore, the optimal combination of these factors for maximum enhancement remains unclear.

Despite the advantages of PT, the principal issue of determining the optimal elements of a plyometric program remains inconclusive. Identification of the role of the various elements of a PT program with regard to their effectiveness can be achieved with the use of meta-analysis: a method that overcomes the problems both of small sample size and low statistical power. Meta-analysis is a quantitative approach in which individual study findings addressing a common problem are statistically integrated and analysed.46 Because meta-analysis can effectively increase the overall sample size, it can also provide a more precise estimate of the effect of PT on strength performance. In addition, meta-analysis can account for the factors partly responsible for the variability in treatment effects observed among different training studies.4, 9, 11, 12, 13 Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the influence of various factors on the effectiveness of PT using a meta-analysis approach.

Section snippets

Methods

A search was performed using key words in the English and French languages (e.g., jump training, drop jump, depth jump, stretch-shortening cycle, plyometric, plyometrics, training of power, plyometric training, pliometrique, and entrainement pliometrique). These key words were applied in the databases ADONIS, ERIC, SPORTSDiscus, EBSCOhost, MedLine and PubMed. Moreover, manual searches of relevant journals and reference lists obtained from articles were conducted. The present meta-analysis

Statistical analysis

To examine the effect of the categorical independent variables on the ES, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used.52, 54, 55 In the case of quantitative independent variables (e.g. age, height, duration of the treatment in weeks, number of repetitions per session) a Pearson's (r) correlation test was used to examine the relationships between ESs and variable values.52 Statistical significance was set at p  0.05 for all analyses. The scale used for interpretation was the one proposed by Rhea,56

Results

The analysis revealed that the average ES of the PT group (0.97; n = 24; 24.25 kg) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to the ES of controls (0.11; n = 7; 4.25 kg).

With regards to the subject characteristics, the results indicate a significant correlation coefficient for body mass (r = 0.451) with the magnitude of the ES. However, there was no significant correlation coefficient for age (r = 0.242), height (r = 0.396) or group size (r = 0.05), with the magnitude of the ES (Table 2). Results of the

Discussion

The results of this investigation support numerous previous studies4, 9, 11, 13, 33, 43 that have concluded that PT is an effective training method for the improvement of strength performance (ES = 0.97; i.e., plyometric group). Thus, the reported strength gains of >20 kg resulting from PT could be of practical relevance for trained athletes in sports aiming at achieving optimum strength performance. The present meta-analysis offers robust quantitative evidence for this conclusion and provides

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that PT significantly improves strength performance. The estimated improvements in strength as a result of PT could be considered as practically relevant—for example, an improvement in strength of >20 kg (i.e., ES = 0.97) could be of high importance for trained athletes in sports relying on strength performance. According to our results, when subjects can perform plyometric exercises with adequate technique, the training gains are independent of

Practical implications

  • The effects of PT may vary because of a large number of variables, such us training programme design, subject characteristics (gender, age), training level, the specific sport activity, familiarity with PT, program duration, and training volume or intensity. These variables should be taken into account by strength and conditioning professionals, who must consider the most appropriate PT approach based on the fundamental movement patterns, technique, volume, frequency, intensity, energy system

References (77)

  • J.L. McNitt-Gray

    Kinetics of the lower extremities during drop landings from three heights

    J Biomech

    (1993)
  • W.J. Kraemer et al.

    Effect of resistance training on women's strength/power and occupational performances

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2001)
  • E. Sáez-Sáez de Villarreal et al.

    Determining variables of plyometric training for improving vertical jump height performance: a meta-analysis

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2009)
  • G.J. Wilson et al.

    Weight and plyometric training: effects on eccentric and concentric force production

    Can J Appl Physiol

    (1996)
  • G.J. Wilson et al.

    The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1993)
  • R.U. Newton et al.

    Four weeks of optimal load ballistic resistance training at the end of season attenuates declining jump performance of women volleyball players

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2006)
  • D. Malatesta et al.

    Effects of electromyostimulation training and volleyball practice on jumping ability

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2003)
  • N.A. Maffiuletti et al.

    Effects of combined electro stimulation and plyometric training on vertical jump height

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2002)
  • M. Cardinale et al.

    Electromyography activity of vastus lateralis muscle during whole-body vibrations of different frequencies

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2003)
  • J.B. Blakey et al.

    The combined effects of weight training and plyometric on dynamic leg strength and leg power

    J Appl Sports Sci Res

    (1987)
  • J.D. Buckley et al.

    Effects of bovine colostrums on anaerobic exercise performance and plasma insulin like growth factor I

    J Sports Sci

    (2003)
  • D. Clutch et al.

    The effects of depth jumps and weight training on leg strength and vertical jumps

    Res Q Exerc Sport

    (1983)
  • I.G. Fatouros et al.

    Evaluation of plyometric exercise training, weight training, and their combination on vertical jumping performance and leg strength

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2000)
  • E. Sáez-Sáez de Villarreal et al.

    Low and moderate plyometric training frequency produce greater jumping and sprinting gains compared with high frequency

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2008)
  • W.J. Anderst et al.

    Effects of plyometric and explosive resistance training on lower body power

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1994)
  • E. Asmussen et al.

    Storage of elastic energy in skeletal muscle in man

    Acta Physiol Scand

    (1974)
  • T. Bauer et al.

    Comparison of training modalities for power development in the lower extremity

    J Appl Sport Sci Res

    (1990)
  • M.F. Bobbert

    Drop jumping as a training method for jumping ability

    Sports Med

    (1990)
  • M.J. Bobbert et al.

    Biomechanical analysis of drop and countermovement jumps

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (1986)
  • C. Bosco et al.

    Store and recoil of elastic energy in slow and fast types of human skeletal muscles

    Acta Physiol Scand

    (1982)
  • G.A. Cavagna et al.

    Positive work done by a previously stretched muscle

    J Appl Physiol

    (1968)
  • C. Bosco et al.

    Potentiation of the mechanical behaviour of the human skeletal muscle through pre-stretching

    Acta Physiol Scand

    (1979)
  • C. Bosco et al.

    Prestretch potentiation of human skeletal muscle during ballistic movement

    Acta Physiol Scand

    (1981)
  • P.V. Komi et al.

    Utilisation of stored elastic energy in leg extensor muscle by men and women

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1978)
  • K. Adams et al.

    The effects of six weeks of squat, plyometric and squat-plyometric training on power production

    J Appl Sports Sci Res

    (1992)
  • D. Baker

    Improving vertical jump performance through general, special, and specific strength training: a brief review

    J Strength Cond Res

    (1996)
  • J.F. Bedi et al.

    Increase in jumping height associated with maximal effort vertical depth jumps

    Res Q Exerc Sport

    (1987)
  • M.F. Bobbert et al.

    Drop jumping I. The influence of jumping technique on the biomechanics of jumping

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1987)
  • W.R. Holcomb et al.

    The effectiveness of a modified plyometric program on power and vertical jump

    J Strength Cond Res

    (1996)
  • N.E. Fowler et al.

    The effectiveness of a pendulum swing for the development on leg strength and counter-movement jump performance

    J Sports Sci

    (1995)
  • C. Delecluse et al.

    Influence of high-resistance and high-velocity training on sprint performance

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1995)
  • S. Duke et al.

    Plyometric: optimising athletic performance through the development of power as assessed by vertical leap ability: an observational study

    Chiropr Sports Med

    (1992)
  • H.T. Ford et al.

    Effects of three combinations of plyometric and weight training programs on selected physical fitness test items

    Percept Motor Skills

    (1983)
  • A.D. Lyttle et al.

    Enhancing performance: maximal power versus combined weights and plyometrics training

    J Strength Cond Res

    (1996)
  • J.F. Vossen et al.

    Comparison of dynamic push-up training and plyometric push-up training on upper body power and strength

    J Strength Cond Res

    (2000)
  • J.A. Potteiger et al.

    Muscle power and fibber characteristics following 8 weeks of plyometric training

    J Strength Cond Res

    (1999)
  • T.E. Hewett et al.

    Plyometric training in female athletes

    Am J Sports Med

    (1996)
  • J.F. Kramer et al.

    Changes in rowing ergometer, weight lighting, vertical jump and isokinetic performance in response to standard and standard plus plyometric training programs

    Int J Sports Med

    (1993)
  • View full text